World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
32
Citations
3555
World Ranking
8124
National Ranking
2691

Samantha M. Wisely publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Samantha M. Wisely sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 135 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Samantha M. Wisely D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Samantha M. Wisely sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Samantha M. Wisely is affiliated with the University of Florida in the United States and has produced a significant body of research primarily in the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Medicine. Their scholarly work covers a range of subfields including Infectious Diseases, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Agronomy and Crop Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Parasitology.

Their research topics primarily focus on viral infections and vectors, vector-borne animal diseases, animal disease management and epidemiology, vector-borne infectious diseases, research on Trypanosoma species and related implications, wildlife ecology and conservation, and studies on leishmaniasis.

Recent publications include the following papers:

  • New developments in the field of genomic technologies and their relevance to conservation management, 2021, Conservation Genetics
  • An ethical analysis of cloning for genetic rescue: Case study of the black-footed ferret, 2021, Biological Conservation
  • Imported Dengue Case Numbers and Local Climatic Patterns Are Associated with Dengue Virus Transmission in Florida, USA, 2022, Insects
  • Identification of the parasite, Trypanosoma cruzi, in multiple tissues of epidemiological significance in the Virginia opossum (Didelphis virginiana): Implications for environmental and vertical transmission routes, 2022, PLoS neglected tropical diseases
  • Ticks and Tick-Borne Pathogens in Recreational Greenspaces in North Central Florida, USA, 2023, Microorganisms

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Samantha M. Wisely include Juan M. Campos Krauer, Nathan D. Burkett-Cadena, Kuttichantran Subramaniam, Kristen Wilson, and Zoe S. White.

These co-authors have contributed extensively to their joint research efforts, with collaborations occurring dozens of times over the course of their careers.

Their work is frequently published in venues such as EDIS, Viruses, Journal of Medical Entomology, Pathogens, and bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), where they have multiple publications that reflect their active involvement in research dissemination.

Best Publications

  • Permanent genetic resources added to molecular ecology resources database 1 May 2009-31 July 2009

    Glenn R. Almany;Maurício P. De Arruda;Wolfgang Arthofer

  • Phylogeography of the North American red fox: vicariance in Pleistocene forest refugia

    Keith B. Aubry;Mark J. Statham;Benjamin N. Sacks;John D. Perrine

  • Genetic Diversity and Fitness in Black-Footed Ferrets Before and During a Bottleneck

    S M Wisely;S W Buskirk;M A Fleming;D B McDonald

  • Land-cover change in the Paraguayan Chaco: 2000–2011

    Marcellus M. Caldas;Douglas Goodin;Steven Sherwood;Juan M. Campos Krauer

  • Quantifying drivers of wild pig movement across multiple spatial and temporal scales

    Shannon L. Kay;Justin W. Fischer;Andrew J. Monaghan;James C. Beasley

  • Effects of wind energy development on nesting ecology of Greater Prairie-Chickens in fragmented grasslands

    Lance B. Mcnew;Lyla M. Hunt;Andrew J. Gregory;Samantha M. Wisely

  • Space use by female Greater Prairie‐Chickens in response to wind energy development

    V. L. Winder;L. B. McNew;A. J. Gregory;L. M. Hunt

  • A technique for sampling ancient DNA that minimizes damage to museum specimens.

    Samantha M. Wisely;Jesús E. Maldonado;Robert C. Fleischer

  • Genetic Diversity and Structure of the Fisher (Martes pennanti) in a Peninsular and Peripheral Metapopulation

    Samantha M. Wisely;Steven W. Buskirk;Gregory A. Russell;Keith B. Aubry

  • Assessment of Social Attraction Techniques Used to Restore a Common Murre Colony in Central California

    Michael W. Parker;Stephen W. Kress;Richard T. Golightly;Harry R. Carter

  • The origin of recently established red fox populations in the United States: translocations or natural range expansions?

    Mark J. Statham;Mark J. Statham;Benjamin N. Sacks;Keith B. Aubry;John D. Perrine

  • Genotypic and phenotypic consequences of reintroduction history in the black-footed ferret ( Mustela nigripes )

    Samantha M. Wisely;Rachel M. Santymire;Rachel M. Santymire;Travis M. Livieri;Sara A. Mueting

  • Effects of wind energy development on survival of female greater prairie-chickens

    Virginia L. Winder;Lance B. McNew;Andrew J. Gregory;Lyla M. Hunt

  • Demography of greater prairie‐chickens: Regional variation in vital rates, sensitivity values, and population dynamics

    Lance B. McNew;Andrew J. Gregory;Samantha M. Wisely;Brett K. Sandercock

  • New developments in the field of genomic technologies and their relevance to conservation management

    Gernot Segelbacher;Mirte Bosse;Pamela Burger;Peter Galbusera

  • Assessing the utility of metabarcoding for diet analyses of the omnivorous wild pig (Sus scrofa).

    Michael S. Robeson Ii;Michael S. Robeson Ii;Kamil Khanipov;George Golovko;Samantha M. Wisely

  • North American montane red foxes: expansion, fragmentation, and the origin of the Sacramento Valley red fox

    Benjamin N. Sacks;Benjamin N. Sacks;Mark J. Statham;Mark J. Statham;John D. Perrine;Samantha M. Wisely

  • Inconsistent effects of landscape heterogeneity and land-use on animal diversity in an agricultural mosaic: a multi-scale and multi-taxon investigation

    Chevonne Reynolds;Chevonne Reynolds;Robert J. Fletcher;Celine M. Carneiro;Nicole Jennings

  • Field data implicating Culicoides stellifer and Culicoides venustus (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) as vectors of epizootic hemorrhagic disease virus.

    Bethany L. McGregor;Kristin E. Sloyer;Katherine A. Sayler;Olivia Goodfriend

  • Invasion ecology of wild pigs ( Sus scrofa ) in Florida, USA: the role of humans in the expansion and colonization of an invasive wild ungulate

    Felipe A. Hernández;Brandon M. Parker;Cortney L. Pylant;Timothy J. Smyser

  • Evaluation of the genetic management of the endangered black‐footed ferret (Mustela nigripes)

    Samantha M. Wisely;David B. McDonald;Steven W. Buskirk

  • Inferring Geographic Isolation of Wolverines in California Using Historical DNA

    Michael K. Schwartz;Keith B. Aubry;Kevin S. Mckelvey;Kristine L. Pilgrim

  • Heteroduplex molecules cause sexing errors in a standard molecular protocol for avian sexing

    Ashley E. Casey;Kenneth L. Jones;Brett K. Sandercock;Samantha M. Wisely

  • Ranavirus phylogenomics: Signatures of recombination and inversions among bullfrog ranaculture isolates

    Sieara C. Claytor;Kuttichantran Subramaniam;Nelmarie Landrau-Giovannetti;V. Gregory Chinchar

Frequent Co-Authors

Brett K. Sandercock
Brett K. Sandercock Kansas State University
John A. Lednicky
John A. Lednicky University of Florida
Ara Monadjem
Ara Monadjem University of Pretoria
Keith B. Aubry
Keith B. Aubry US Forest Service
Benjamin N. Sacks
Benjamin N. Sacks University of California, Davis
James C. Beasley
James C. Beasley University of Georgia
Steven W. Buskirk
Steven W. Buskirk University of Wyoming
Kurt C. VerCauteren
Kurt C. VerCauteren United States Department of Agriculture
John C. Kilgo
John C. Kilgo US Forest Service
Gregory E. Glass
Gregory E. Glass University of Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring the fields of Ecology and Evolution in the USA can open doors to a broad array of online degree options and diverse career pathways. Students interested in data analysis and modeling in ecology may find online degree mathematics programs especially relevant. These programs provide strong analytical skills that are highly valued in research and conservation.

Creativity and communication are also important in scientific fields. For those who enjoy visual storytelling and want to help share scientific discoveries, online graphic design programs can be a strategic complement to traditional ecology coursework.

Interdisciplinary backgrounds are increasingly sought after as environmental issues intersect with other fields. If you’re budget-conscious, consider the many cheap online interdisciplinary studies degree options that let you blend ecology with policy, communication, or business.

Those drawn to the historical aspect of natural sciences may pursue further study in history and research. Potential earnings can vary, so it’s worth learning how much do historians make before selecting a specialization or advanced degree.

Best Scientists Citing Samantha M. Wisely

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles