World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
38
Citations
4771
World Ranking
6709
National Ranking
2262

Benjamin N. Sacks publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Benjamin N. Sacks sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 142 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Benjamin N. Sacks D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Benjamin N. Sacks sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Benjamin N. Sacks is affiliated with the University of California, Davis in the United States. Their research spans the fields of Environmental Science and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a strong focus on Ecology, Genetics, and Ecological Modeling as key subfields.

Their recent publications reflect an emphasis on wildlife ecology, genetic diversity, and population structure. Notable papers include:

  • "Natural and human-driven selection of a single non-coding body size variant in ancient and modern canids," 2022, published in Current Biology
  • "Guttate psoriasis secondary to COVID-19," 2020, published in BMJ Case Reports
  • "Ancient divergence of Indian and Tibetan wolves revealed by recombination-aware phylogenomics," 2021, published in Molecular Ecology
  • "Next-generation phylogeography resolves post-glacial colonization patterns in a widespread carnivore, the red fox ( Vulpes vulpes ), in Europe," 2021, published in Molecular Ecology
  • "Pleistocene origins, western ghost lineages, and the emerging phylogeographic history of the red wolf and coyote," 2021, published in Molecular Ecology

Their research topics cover a broad array of areas within wildlife ecology and genetics, including:

  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
  • Rangeland and Wildlife Management

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Benjamin N. Sacks include:

  • Mark J. Statham
  • Stevi L. Vanderzwan
  • Cate B. Quinn
  • Sophie Preckler-Quisquater
  • Lauren M. Hennelly

Their publications are most commonly found in the following venues:

  • Molecular Ecology
  • Journal of Heredity
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Conservation Genetics Resources
  • Conservation Genetics

Best Publications

  • Population structure of California coyotes corresponds to habitat‐specific breaks and illuminates species history

    Benjamin N. Sacks;Sarah K. Brown;Holly B. Ernest

  • Permanent Genetic Resources added to Molecular Ecology Resources Database 1 October 2009–30 November 2009

    Junghwa An;Arnaud Bechet;Åsa Berggren;Sarah K. Brown

  • Anticoagulant Rodenticides on our Public and Community Lands: Spatial Distribution of Exposure and Poisoning of a Rare Forest Carnivore

    Mourad W Gabriel;Leslie W. Woods;Robert Poppenga;Rick A. Sweitzer

  • Phylogeography of the North American red fox: vicariance in Pleistocene forest refugia

    Keith B. Aubry;Mark J. Statham;Benjamin N. Sacks;John D. Perrine

  • Territoriality and breeding status of coyotes relative to sheep predation.

    Benjamin N. Sacks;Michael M. Jaeger;Jennifer C. C. Neale;Dale R. McCullough

  • Resource utilization and interspecific relations of sympatric bobcats and coyotes

    Jennifer C. C. Neale;Jennifer C. C. Neale;Benjamin N. Sacks

  • Range-wide multilocus phylogeography of the red fox reveals ancient continental divergence, minimal genomic exchange and distinct demographic histories

    Mark J. Statham;James Murdoch;Jan Janecka;Keith B. Aubry

  • Food habits and space use of gray foxes in relation to sympatric coyotes and bobcats

    Jennifer C. C. Neale;Benjamin N. Sacks

  • The effectiveness of selective removal of breeding coyotes in reducing sheep predation

    Karen M. Blejwas;Benjamin N. Sacks;Michael M. Jaeger;Dale R. Mccullough

  • Relative Vulnerability of Coyotes to Removal Methods on a Northern California Ranch

    Benjamin N. Sacks;Karen M. Blejwas;Michael M. Jaeger

  • Y Chromosome Analysis of Dingoes and Southeast Asian Village Dogs Suggests a Neolithic Continental Expansion from Southeast Asia Followed by Multiple Austronesian Dispersals

    Benjamin N. Sacks;Sarah K. Brown;Danielle Stephens;Niels C. Pedersen

  • Coyote movements and social structure along a cryptic population genetic subdivision

    Benjamin N. Sacks;Brian R. Mitchell;Christen L. Williams;Holly B. Ernest

  • Coyotes Demonstrate How Habitat Specialization by Individuals of a Generalist Species Can Diversify Populations in a Heterogeneous Ecoregion

    Benjamin N. Sacks;Benjamin N. Sacks;Danika L. Bannasch;Bruno B. Chomel;Holly B. Ernest

  • On the origin of a domesticated species: Identifying the parent population of Russian silver foxes (Vulpes vulpes).

    Mark J. Statham;Lyudmila N. Trut;Benjamin Sacks;Anastasiya V. Kharlamova

  • A restricted hybrid zone between native and introduced red fox (Vulpes vulpes) populations suggests reproductive barriers and competitive exclusion.

    Benjamin N. Sacks;Benjamin N. Sacks;Marcelle Moore;Mark J. Statham;Heiko U. Wittmer;Heiko U. Wittmer

  • Genetic evidence for the persistence of the critically endangered Sierra Nevada red fox in California

    John D. Perrine;John P. Pollinger;Benjamin N. Sacks;Reginald H. Barrett

  • The origin of recently established red fox populations in the United States: translocations or natural range expansions?

    Mark J. Statham;Mark J. Statham;Benjamin N. Sacks;Keith B. Aubry;John D. Perrine

  • Ancient DNA evidence for genetic continuity in arctic dogs

    Sarah K. Brown;Christyann M. Darwent;Benjamin N. Sacks

  • Developmental validation of DogFiler, a novel multiplex for canine DNA profiling in forensic casework ☆

    Elizabeth Wictum;Teri Kun;Christina Lindquist;Julia Malvick

  • Phylogenetic distinctiveness of Middle Eastern and Southeast Asian village dog Y chromosomes illuminates dog origins.

    Sarah K. Brown;Niels C. Pedersen;Sardar Jafarishorijeh;Danika L. Bannasch

Frequent Co-Authors

Keith B. Aubry
Keith B. Aubry US Forest Service
Heiko U. Wittmer
Heiko U. Wittmer Victoria University of Wellington
Bruno B Chomel
Bruno B Chomel University of California, Davis
Janet E Foley
Janet E Foley University of California, Davis
Niels C Pedersen
Niels C Pedersen University of California, Davis
Samantha M. Wisely
Samantha M. Wisely University of Florida
Reginald H. Barrett
Reginald H. Barrett University of California, Berkeley
Ettore Randi
Ettore Randi Aalborg University
Rickie W. Kasten
Rickie W. Kasten University of California, Davis
Thomas H. McGovern
Thomas H. McGovern Hunter College

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in broadening their expertise beyond Ecology and Evolution, a variety of online graduate programs can expand your career options. Today’s flexible learning opportunities include specialized degrees that complement and enhance scientific backgrounds.

Those considering roles in education, research, or applied science may find the master psychologie à distance a valuable choice, offering accelerated pathways to deepen your understanding of behavior and cognition. Similarly, expanding into public health or support services is possible with online clinical mental health counseling programs, equipping graduates with counseling skills relevant to societal and ecological well-being.

If you’re intrigued by the intersection of biology and law, a forensic psychology degree opens doors to environmental forensics and conservation enforcement careers. Alternatively, those wishing to work with youth or pursue environmental education can consider a masters in child psychology online to better support children’s interaction with natural environments.

By pairing an Ecology and Evolution background with these online degrees, graduates can access flexible, interdisciplinary career pathways in research, education, counseling, policy, and more.

Best Scientists Citing Benjamin N. Sacks

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles