World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
40
Citations
6369
World Ranking
5384
National Ranking
32

Asher Ben-Arieh publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Asher Ben-Arieh sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 121 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Asher Ben-Arieh D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Asher Ben-Arieh sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Asher Ben-Arieh is affiliated with the Hebrew University of Jerusalem in Israel. Their research primarily spans the fields of Social Sciences and Psychology, with focused subfields including Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Safety Research, Education, and Social Psychology.

The main topics addressed in their work include:

  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Children's Rights and Participation
  • Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Ben-Arieh has contributed to several publication venues, with notable frequent appearances in:

  • International Journal on Child Maltreatment Research Policy and Practice
  • Child Abuse & Neglect
  • Child Indicators Research
  • Child Protection and Practice
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Some of their recent papers include:

  • "Children's participation: A new role for children in the field of child maltreatment," 2020, Child Abuse & Neglect
  • "Adherence to emotion norms is greater in individualist cultures than in collectivist cultures," 2022, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • "Research with Children: Lessons Learned from the International Survey of Children's Wellbeing," 2021, Child Indicators Research
  • "La historia del estudio Children's Worlds," 2020, Sociedad e Infancias
  • "Not What I Expected: Training Social Work Students in Community-Based Child Prevention of Child Maltreatment," 2020, International Journal on Child Maltreatment Research Policy and Practice

Ben-Arieh frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including:

  • Hanita Kosher
  • Sagit Bruck
  • Carmit Katz
  • Daphna Gross-Manos
  • Maya Tamir

Best Publications

  • The Child Indicators Movement: Past, Present, and Future

    Asher Ben-Arieh

  • WHERE ARE THE CHILDREN? CHILDREN'S ROLE IN MEASURING AND MONITORING THEIR WELL-BEING

    Asher Ben-Arieh

  • Multifaceted Concept of Child Well-Being

    Asher Ben-Arieh;Ferran Casas;Ivar Frønes;Jill E. Korbin

  • Handbook of Child Well-Being

    Asher Ben-Arieh;Ferran Casas;Ivar Frønes;Jill E. Korbin

  • Taxonomy for child well-being indicators : A framework for the analysis of the well-being of children

    Asher Ben-Arieh;Ivar Frønes

  • Beyond Welfare: Measuring and Monitoring the State of Children: New Trends and Domains

    Asher Ben-Arieh

  • Does the importance of parent and peer relationships for adolescents' life satisfaction vary across cultures?

    Beate Schwarz;Boris Mayer;Gisela Trommsdorff;Asher Ben-Arieh

  • The Characteristics of Children’s Subjective Well-Being

    Tamar Dinisman;Asher Ben-Arieh

  • From Child Welfare to Children Well-Being: The Child Indicators Perspective

    Asher Ben-Arieh

  • What children think about their rights and their well-being: A cross-national comparison.

    Hanita Kosher;Asher Ben-Arieh

  • Strong Communities for Children: results of a multi-year community-based initiative to protect children from harm

    James R. McDonell;Asher Ben-Arieh;Gary B. Melton

  • Beyond the numbers: How do we monitor the state of our children?

    Asher Ben-Arieh;Robert Goerge

  • Opinion, Dialogue, Review: Time for (More) Time-Use Studies: Studying the Daily Activities of Children

    Asher Ben-Arieh;Anat Ofir

  • The Rationale for Measuring and Monitoring Children’s Well-Being

    Asher Ben-Arieh;Natalie Hevener Kaufman;Arlene Bowers Andrews;Robert M. Goerge

  • Indicators of Children’s Well being: What should be Measured and Why?

    Asher Ben-Arieh;Ivar Frønes

  • Measuring and Monitoring Children's Well-Being across the World

    Arlene Bowers Andrews;Asher Ben-Arieh

  • The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child: Its Relevance for Adolescents

    Martin D. Ruck;Daniel P. Keating;Elizabeth M. Saewyc;Felton Earls

  • The "geography" of child maltreatment in Israel: Findings from a national data set of cases reported to the social services.

    Asher Ben-Arieh;Muhammad M. Haj-Yahia

  • Indicators and Indices of Children's Well‐being: towards a more policy‐oriented perspective

    Asher Ben-Arieh

  • Children's participation: A new role for children in the field of child maltreatment.

    Hanita Kosher;Asher Ben-Arieh

  • From child welfare to child well-being : an international perspective on knowledge in the service of policy making

    Sheila B. Kamerman;Shelley Phipps;Asher Ben-Arieh

  • WHERE ARE THE CHILDREN? CHILDREN'S ROLE IN MEASURING AND MONITORING THEIR

    Asher Ben-Arieh

Frequent Co-Authors

J. Lawrence Aber
J. Lawrence Aber New York University
Muhammad M. Haj-Yahia
Muhammad M. Haj-Yahia Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Ferran Casas
Ferran Casas University of Girona
Gary B. Melton
Gary B. Melton University of Colorado Denver
Jill E. Korbin
Jill E. Korbin Case Western Reserve University
Gail S. Goodman
Gail S. Goodman University of California, Davis
E. Scott Huebner
E. Scott Huebner University of South Carolina
Ariel Knafo
Ariel Knafo Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Gisela Trommsdorff
Gisela Trommsdorff University of Konstanz
Daniel P. Keating
Daniel P. Keating University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities offers flexible options for a wide range of meaningful careers. Many students are drawn to counseling, therapy, psychology, and social work—fields with strong job outlooks and opportunities to make a positive impact.

If you’re interested in a counseling career, consider reviewing the best online cacrep counseling programs to find affordable, accredited options meeting high professional standards. For those passionate about supporting couples and families, there are also mft masters programs that can be completed online, preparing graduates for licensure and practice.

Psychology remains a popular choice, providing a strong foundation for various roles in mental health and related fields. To help you get started, explore affordable online psychology degrees that balance quality with cost-effectiveness. If social work is your calling, you may benefit from reviewing the easiest msw program options, offering accessible pathways into this rewarding profession.

Each of these online pathways can lead to diverse careers where you can address societal challenges, support individuals and communities, and shape positive change.

Best Scientists Citing Asher Ben-Arieh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles