World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
93
Citations
39003
World Ranking
2074
National Ranking
1129

Robert L. Moritz publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert L. Moritz sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 347 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Robert L. Moritz D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert L. Moritz sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 93 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert L. Moritz is affiliated with the Institute for Systems Biology in the United States. Their research spans several main fields, including Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, Chemistry, and Medicine.

The scientist's work focuses extensively on subfields such as Molecular Biology, Spectroscopy, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Immunology, and Infectious Diseases. Key topics in their research include Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications, Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies, Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications, RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms, Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies, Malaria Research and Control, and Machine Learning in Bioinformatics.

Robert L. Moritz has published numerous papers in prominent venues. Recent publications include:

  • Standardized annotation of translated open reading frames, 2022, Nature Biotechnology
  • Advances and Utility of the Human Plasma Proteome, 2021, Journal of Proteome Research
  • A high-stringency blueprint of the human proteome, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Molecular damage in aging, 2021, Nature Aging
  • Recent Progress in Lyme Disease and Remaining Challenges, 2021, Frontiers in Medicine

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Robert L. Moritz include:

  • Michael R. Hoopmann
  • Eric W. Deutsch
  • Ulrike Kusebauch
  • Mukul K. Midha
  • Zhi Sun

Their work has appeared repeatedly in high-impact publication venues. The most frequent include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Proteome Research
  • Scientific Data
  • Nature Communications
  • Nature

Best Publications

  • A cross-platform toolkit for mass spectrometry and proteomics

    Matthew C Chambers;Brendan Maclean;Robert Burke;Dario Amodei

  • Identification of DIABLO, a Mammalian Protein that Promotes Apoptosis by Binding to and Antagonizing IAP Proteins

    Anne M Verhagen;Paul G Ekert;Paul G Ekert;Miha Pakusch;John Silke

  • Exosomes: proteomic insights and diagnostic potential

    Richard J Simpson;Justin We Lim;Robert L Moritz;Suresh Mathivanan

  • The ProteomeXchange consortium in 2017: supporting the cultural change in proteomics public data deposition

    Eric W. Deutsch;Attila Csordas;Zhi Sun;Andrew Jarnuczak

  • The conserved SOCS box motif in suppressors of cytokine signaling binds to elongins B and C and may couple bound proteins to proteasomal degradation

    Jian Guo Zhang;Alison Farley;Sandra E. Nicholson;Tracy A. Willson

  • Overview of the HUPO Plasma Proteome Project: results from the pilot phase with 35 collaborating laboratories and multiple analytical groups, generating a core dataset of 3020 proteins and a publicly-available database.

    Gilbert S. Omenn;David J. States;Marcin Adamski;Thomas W. Blackwell

  • HtrA2 promotes cell death through its serine protease activity and its ability to antagonize inhibitor of apoptosis proteins.

    Anne M Verhagen;John Silke;Paul G Ekert;Paul G Ekert;Miha Pakusch

  • Proteomics Analysis of A33 Immunoaffinity-purified Exosomes Released from the Human Colon Tumor Cell Line LIM1215 Reveals a Tissue-specific Protein Signature

    Suresh Mathivanan;Justin W. E. Lim;Bow J. Tauro;Hong Ji

  • PRMT5-mediated methylation of histone H4R3 recruits DNMT3A, coupling histone and DNA methylation in gene silencing.

    Quan Zhao;Quan Zhao;Gerhard Rank;Yuen T Tan;Haitao Li

  • iProphet: Multi-level Integrative Analysis of Shotgun Proteomic Data Improves Peptide and Protein Identification Rates and Error Estimates

    David Shteynberg;Eric W. Deutsch;Henry H N Lam;Jimmy K. Eng

  • Targeted Peptide Measurements in Biology and Medicine: Best Practices for Mass Spectrometry-based Assay Development Using a Fit-for-Purpose Approach

    Steven A. Carr;Susan E. Abbatiello;Bradley L. Ackermann;Christoph Borchers

  • Multi-laboratory assessment of reproducibility, qualitative and quantitative performance of SWATH-mass spectrometry

    Ben C. Collins;Christie L. Hunter;Yansheng Liu;Birgit Schilling

  • A High-Confidence Human Plasma Proteome Reference Set with Estimated Concentrations in PeptideAtlas

    Terry Farrah;Eric W. Deutsch;Gilbert S. Omenn;Gilbert S. Omenn;David S. Campbell

  • Biosynthesis of vascular endothelial growth factor-D involves proteolytic processing which generates non-covalent homodimers.

    Steven A. Stacker;Kaye Stenvers;Carol Caesar;Angela Vitali

  • A repository of assays to quantify 10,000 human proteins by SWATH-MS.

    George Rosenberger;George Rosenberger;Ching Chiek Gene Koh;Ching Chiek Gene Koh;Tiannan Guo;Hannes L. Röst;Hannes L. Röst

  • A wellness study of 108 individuals using personal, dense, dynamic data clouds.

    Nathan D Price;Andrew T Magis;John C Earls;Gustavo Glusman

  • A HUPO test sample study reveals common problems in mass spectrometry–based proteomics

    Alexander W. Bell;Eric W. Deutsch;Catherine E. Au;Robert E. Kearney

  • Trans-Proteomic Pipeline, a standardized data processing pipeline for large-scale reproducible proteomics informatics.

    Eric W. Deutsch;Luis Mendoza;David Shteynberg;Joseph Slagel

  • THE DISULFIDE BOND STRUCTURE OF PLASMODIUM APICAL MEMBRANE ANTIGEN-1

    Anthony N. Hodder;Pauline E. Crewther;Mary L.S.M. Matthew;Gavin E. Reid

  • A complete mass-spectrometric map of the yeast proteome applied to quantitative trait analysis

    Paola Picotti;Mathieu Clément-Ziza;Hugo Y K Lam;David S Campbell

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard J. Simpson
Richard J. Simpson La Trobe University
Eric W. Deutsch
Eric W. Deutsch University of Washington
Gilbert S. Omenn
Gilbert S. Omenn University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Gavin E. Reid
Gavin E. Reid University of Melbourne
Hong Ji
Hong Ji University of California, Davis
Edouard C. Nice
Edouard C. Nice Monash University
Antony W. Burgess
Antony W. Burgess Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research
Mark S. Baker
Mark S. Baker Macquarie University
Stefan H. I. Kappe
Stefan H. I. Kappe University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Robert L. Moritz

Trending Scientists