World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 30 7610 7073 3698 3371 69 11928

Amy L. Reschly publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Amy L. Reschly between 2006 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Amy L. Reschly published across 19 years, from 2006 to 2024, averaging 3.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2012. 6 of the 75 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2012. 2006: 2 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 1 publication 2017: 1 publication 2018: 2 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 1 publication
2006 2024

75 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Amy L. Reschly: publications per year, 2006 to 2024
Year Publications
2006 2
2007 8
2008 4
2009 5
2010 5
2011 2
2012 9
2013 3
2014 5
2015 1
2016 1
2017 1
2018 2
2019 6
2020 9
2021 0
2022 6
2023 5
2024 1
Total 75
Download as CSV

Amy L. Reschly publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amy L. Reschly sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 64–73 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 69 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161 69
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Amy L. Reschly D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amy L. Reschly sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 30 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177 30
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Amy L. Reschly is affiliated with the University of Georgia in the United States. Their research predominantly spans the social sciences, with a strong focus on psychology. The main subfields of their work include education, safety research, social psychology, clinical psychology, and developmental and educational psychology.

The scientist's work addresses several core topics such as early childhood education and development, parental involvement in education, youth development and social support, higher education research studies, grit, self-efficacy, and motivation, bullying, victimization, and aggression, as well as child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development.

Amy L. Reschly has contributed multiple papers to academic literature, including:

  • "Predicting Postsecondary Enrollment With Secondary Student Engagement Data" (2020) published in the Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
  • "Bullying Behavior and School Bonding for Predicting Student Engagement Among Chilean Adolescents" (2022) published in the Journal of School Violence
  • "The role of high school student engagement in postsecondary enrollment" (2022) published in Psychology in the Schools
  • "A Preliminary Examination of Student Engagement Before and During COVID-19 in the U.S." (2023) published in Child Indicators Research
  • "Cross-Cultural Validation of the Student Engagement Instrument for Chilean Students" (2022) published in the Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment

The main venues for their publications consist of the Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, PsycTESTS Dataset, Journal of School Violence, Psychology in the Schools, and Child Indicators Research.

Frequent collaborators in their work include James J. Appleton, Jorge J. Varela, Roberto Melipillán, Kathleen Fraysier, and Ana Maria Squicciarini Navarro, reflecting a network of partnerships across related research areas. The number of collaborations ranges from 2 to 5 joint works with these coauthors.

Best Publications

  • Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the Student Engagement Instrument

    James J. Appleton;Sandra L. Christenson;Dongjin Kim;Amy L. Reschly

  • Handbook of Research on Student Engagement.

    Sandra L. Christenson;Amy L. Reschly;Cathy Wylie

  • Jingle, Jangle, and Conceptual Haziness: Evolution and Future Directions of the Engagement Construct

    Amy L. Reschly;Sandra L. Christenson

  • Engagement as flourishing: The contribution of positive emotions and coping to adolescents' engagement at school and with learning

    Amy L. Reschly;E. Scott Huebner;James J. Appleton;Susan Antaramian

  • Prediction of Dropout Among Students With Mild Disabilities A Case for the Inclusion of Student Engagement Variables

    Amy L. Reschly;Sandra L. Christenson

  • Curriculum-based measurement oral reading as an indicator of reading achievement: a meta-analysis of the correlational evidence.

    Amy L. Reschly;Todd W. Busch;Joseph Betts;Stanley L. Deno

  • Best practices in fostering student engagement

    Sandra L. Christenson;A. L. Reschly;J. J. Appleton;S. Berman

  • Handbook of School-Family Partnerships.

    Sandra L. Christenson;Amy L. Reschly

  • A study of the factorial invariance of the Student Engagement Instrument (SEI): Results from middle and high school students

    Joseph E. Betts;James J. Appleton;Amy L. Reschly;Sandra L. Christenson

  • Reexamining Gifted Underachievement and Dropout Through the Lens of Student Engagement

    Rebecca N. Landis;Amy L. Reschly

  • The Handbook of Research on StudentEngagement

    Sandra L. Christenson;A. L. Reschly;C. A. Wylie

  • Measuring student engagement among elementary students: pilot of the Student Engagement Instrument--Elementary Version.

    Chandra P. Carter;Amy L. Reschly;Matthew D. Lovelace;James J. Appleton

  • DEVELOPING A SCHOOL-WIDE PROGRESS-MONITORING SYSTEM

    Stanley L. Deno;Amy L. Reschly;Erica S. Lembke;Deanne Magnusson

  • Examination of the Predictive Validity of Preschool Early Literacy Skills

    Kristen Missall;Amy Reschly;Joseph Betts;Scott R McConnell

  • Moving From “Context Matters” to Engaged Partnerships With Families

    Amy L. Reschly;Sandra L. Christenson

  • Reading and School Completion: Critical Connections and Matthew Effects

    Amy L. Reschly

  • The Incremental Validity of Positive Emotions in Predicting School Functioning.

    Ashley D. Lewis;E. Scott Huebner;Amy L. Reschly;Robert F. Valois

  • Concurrent and Predictive Validity of the Student Engagement Instrument.

    Matthew D. Lovelace;Amy L. Reschly;James J. Appleton;Mary E. Lutz

  • Exploring the Student Engagement Instrument and Career Perceptions with College Students

    Tabitha Grier-Reed;James Appleton;Michael Rodriguez;Zoila Ganuza

  • Interventions for Student Engagement: Overview and State of the Field

    Jennifer A. Fredricks;Amy L. Reschly;Sandra L. Christenson

  • Jingle, Jangle, 1 and Conceptual Haziness 2 : Evolution and Future Directions of the Engagement Construct

    Amy L. Reschly;Sandra L. Christenson

Frequent Co-Authors

Sandra L. Christenson
Sandra L. Christenson University of Minnesota
E. Scott Huebner
E. Scott Huebner University of South Carolina
Jennifer A. Fredricks
Jennifer A. Fredricks Connecticut College
Stanley L. Deno
Stanley L. Deno University of Minnesota
Jeffrey D. Long
Jeffrey D. Long University of Iowa
Gerald Tindal
Gerald Tindal University of Oregon
Scott R. McConnell
Scott R. McConnell University of Minnesota
James E. Ysseldyke
James E. Ysseldyke University of Minnesota
Robert F. Valois
Robert F. Valois University of South Carolina
Martha L. Thurlow
Martha L. Thurlow University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online learning has created new opportunities for students interested in Social Sciences and Humanities. Many universities now offer online master's degree programs designed for those who want to deepen their expertise or switch careers quickly and conveniently.

If you want to finish your undergraduate studies at a faster pace, there are also accelerated bachelor degree programs available online. These programs can help working adults and transfer students complete their degree requirements more efficiently.

For individuals passionate about social work or behavior analysis, there are specialized degrees available. The msw (Master of Social Work) remains a strong gateway into clinical practice, advocacy, and community leadership roles. Meanwhile, students looking to work with individuals with behavioral needs can benefit from bcba programs that prepare graduates for board certification in behavior analysis.

Exploring these online pathways can provide flexibility, affordability, and the credentials needed for a meaningful impact in the realm of Social Sciences and Humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Amy L. Reschly

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles