World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
68
Citations
19061
World Ranking
437
National Ranking
204

Materials Science

D-Index
70
Citations
19896
World Ranking
4384
National Ranking
1171

William P. King publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William P. King sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 406 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

William P. King D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William P. King sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Overview

William P. King is affiliated with the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Engineering, with significant contributions in Mechanical Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, and Automotive Engineering.

Their work covers a range of main topics including:

  • Heat Transfer and Optimization
  • Phase Change Materials Research
  • Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
  • Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
  • Thermal properties of materials
  • Biosensors and Analytical Detection
  • Advanced Thermoelectric Materials and Devices

Their recent scholarly papers include:

  • Rapid isothermal amplification and portable detection system for SARS-CoV-2, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Phase change material-based thermal energy storage, 2021, Cell Reports Physical Science
  • High power and energy density dynamic phase change materials using pressure-enhanced close contact melting, 2022, Nature Energy
  • High power density thermal energy storage using additively manufactured heat exchangers and phase change material, 2020, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer
  • Ultra-power-dense heat exchanger development through genetic algorithm design and additive manufacturing, 2021, Joule

The primary venues where they frequently publish include:

  • International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Applied Physics Letters
  • Additive Manufacturing

William P. King regularly collaborates with the following co-authors:

  • Nenad Miljkovic
  • Sameh Tawfick
  • Rashid Bashir
  • Davis J. McGregor
  • Robert A. Stavins

Best Publications

  • Nanoscale thermal transport. II. 2003–2012

    David G. Cahill;Paul V. Braun;Gang Chen;David R. Clarke

  • Nanoscale Tunable Reduction of Graphene Oxide for Graphene Electronics

    Zhongqing Wei;Debin Wang;Suenne Kim;Soo Young Kim;Soo Young Kim

  • High-power lithium ion microbatteries from interdigitated three-dimensional bicontinuous nanoporous electrodes

    James H. Pikul;Hui Gang Zhang;Jiung Cho;Paul V. Braun

  • Nanoscale Joule heating, Peltier cooling and current crowding at graphene–metal contacts

    Kyle L. Grosse;Myung Ho Bae;Feifei Lian;Eric Pop

  • Rapid isothermal amplification and portable detection system for SARS-CoV-2.

    Anurup Ganguli;Ariana Mostafa;Jacob Berger;Mehmet Y. Aydin

  • Performance analysis of near-field thermophotovoltaic devices considering absorption distribution

    K. Park;S. Basu;W. P. King;Z. M. Zhang

  • 3D printing of shape-conformable thermoelectric materials using all-inorganic Bi2Te3-based inks

    Fredrick Kim;Beomjin Kwon;Youngho Eom;Ji Eun Lee

  • Myoblast alignment and differentiation on cell culture substrates with microscale topography and model chemistries.

    Joseph L. Charest;Andrés J. García;William P. King

  • Friction characteristics of microtextured surfaces under mixed and hydrodynamic lubrication

    Ashwin Ramesh;Wasim Akram;Surya P. Mishra;Andrew H. Cannon

  • Electrical, Thermal, and Mechanical Characterization of Silicon Microcantilever Heaters

    Jungchul Lee;T. Beechem;T.L. Wright;B.A. Nelson

  • Combined microscale mechanical topography and chemical patterns on polymer cell culture substrates

    Joseph L. Charest;Marcus T. Eliason;Andrés J. García;William P. King

  • High power rechargeable batteries

    Paul V. Braun;Jiung Cho;James H. Pikul;William P. King

  • Impact of polymer film thickness and cavity size on polymer flow during embossing: toward process design rules for nanoimprint lithography

    Harry D. Rowland;Amy C. Sun;P. Randy Schunk;William Paul King

  • Atomic force microscope cantilevers for combined thermomechanical data writing and reading

    William Paul King;Thomas W. Kenny;Kenneth E. Goodson;Graham Cross

  • Holographic patterning of high-performance on-chip 3D lithium-ion microbatteries

    Hailong Ning;James H. Pikul;Runyu Zhang;Xuejiao Li

  • Using nanoscale thermocapillary flows to create arrays of purely semiconducting single-walled carbon nanotubes

    Sung Hun Jin;Simon N. Dunham;Jizhou Song;Xu Xie

  • High-speed, sub-15 nm feature size thermochemical nanolithography.

    Robert Szoszkiewicz;Takashi Okada;Simon C. Jones;Tai De Li

  • Nanoscale deposition of solid inks via thermal dip pen nanolithography

    P. E. Sheehan;L. J. Whitman;William Paul King;Brent A. Nelson

  • High power and energy density dynamic phase change materials using pressure-enhanced close contact melting

    Unknown

  • Water droplet impact on elastic superhydrophobic surfaces.

    Patricia B. Weisensee;Junjiao Tian;Nenad Miljkovic;Nenad Miljkovic;William P. King

  • Hot embossing for micropatterned cell substrates.

    Joseph L. Charest;Lindsay E. Bryant;Andres J. Garcia;William P. King

  • Impact of polymer film thickness and cavity size on polymer flow during embossing : towards process design rules for nanoimprint lithography.

    Peter Randall Schunk;William P. King;Amy Cha-Tien Sun;Harry D. Rowland

Frequent Co-Authors

Elisa Riedo
Elisa Riedo New York University
Paul V. Braun
Paul V. Braun University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Nenad Miljkovic
Nenad Miljkovic University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Rashid Bashir
Rashid Bashir University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Paul E. Sheehan
Paul E. Sheehan Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
Kenneth E. Goodson
Kenneth E. Goodson Stanford University
Seth R. Marder
Seth R. Marder University of Colorado Boulder
Samuel Graham
Samuel Graham Georgia Institute of Technology
Lane W. Martin
Lane W. Martin Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Eric Pop
Eric Pop Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in pursuing Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, exploring related online degrees can enhance career prospects. Many students consider complementary fields like Speech-Language Pathology, which offers flexible online programs. When planning your education path, understanding how many slp grad schools should i apply to can help you strategically select programs that fit your goals and maximize acceptance chances.

Choosing the right program is crucial, especially if you aim for an easier admission process. Researching the easiest slp programs to get into can provide valuable insights, helping you balance competitiveness and program quality. Additionally, cost is a significant factor; reviewing details about speech pathology degree online cost enables better financial planning to avoid unexpected expenses.

Veterans seeking to transition into engineering-related careers can find tailored opportunities through online speech pathology bachelor degree for veterans programs. These often offer benefits like flexible schedules and financial support, making them a practical choice for those with military experience.

Evaluating these related pathways not only diversifies your skill set but also opens doors to interdisciplinary roles that combine engineering principles with human-centered technology solutions, expanding future career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing William P. King

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles