World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jaan Valsiner

Jaan Valsiner

Award Badge
Psychology
Denmark
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 70 2263 2063 8 8 509 20313

Jaan Valsiner publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jaan Valsiner between 1965 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jaan Valsiner published across 61 years, from 1965 to 2025, averaging 11 papers a year. Output peaked at 93 publications in 2017. 26 of the 671 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1965 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 93. Peak 93 publications in 2017. 1965: 1 publication 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 5 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 11 publications 1987: 7 publications 1988: 8 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 11 publications 1992: 9 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 10 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 19 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 11 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 20 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 28 publications 2013: 48 publications 2014: 42 publications 2015: 42 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 93 publications 2018: 40 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 31 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 21 publications 2025: 5 publications
1965 2025

671 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jaan Valsiner: publications per year, 1965 to 2025
Year Publications
1965 1
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 2
1979 1
1980 0
1981 0
1982 2
1983 1
1984 5
1985 4
1986 11
1987 7
1988 8
1989 4
1990 2
1991 11
1992 9
1993 1
1994 10
1995 5
1996 19
1997 8
1998 11
1999 6
2000 7
2001 8
2002 9
2003 5
2004 8
2005 14
2006 10
2007 20
2008 10
2009 9
2010 7
2011 18
2012 28
2013 48
2014 42
2015 42
2016 18
2017 93
2018 40
2019 11
2020 15
2021 31
2022 14
2023 10
2024 21
2025 5
Total 671
Download as CSV

Jaan Valsiner publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jaan Valsiner sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 501–510 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 509 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23 509
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jaan Valsiner D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jaan Valsiner sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 70–71 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215 70
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in Denmark Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Psychology in Denmark Leader Award

Overview

Jaan Valsiner is affiliated with Aalborg University in Denmark and has a significant body of research primarily within psychology and related social sciences. Their work spans several specific domains, including social psychology, clinical psychology, general psychology, health professions, and sociology and political science.

The main fields of study for this researcher include:

  • Psychology
  • Social Sciences
  • Health Professions

Within these fields, the subfields of focus comprise:

  • Social Psychology
  • General Health Professions
  • General Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

The research topics commonly addressed in their work include:

  • Social Representations and Identity
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Community Health and Development
  • Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
  • Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Recent notable papers by Jaan Valsiner are:

  • Where Occidental Science Went Wrong: Failing to See Systemic Unity in Diversity, 2020, Psychology and Developing Societies
  • The Inter-modal Pre-Construction Method (IMPreC): Exploring Hyper-Generalization, 2021, Human Arenas
  • From Clay Feet to New Psychology: Starting the Move, 2020, Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science

Other relevant papers by Valsiner include:

  • Spiral and Helical Models for Psychology: Leaving Linearity Behind, 2021, Human Arenas (note: co-authored with Marc Antoine Campill)

Frequent publication venues for this researcher are:

  • Human Arenas
  • Psychology and Developing Societies
  • Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science
  • Possibility Studies & Society
  • Review of General Psychology

Jaan Valsiner has published books primarily through Springer International Publishing, with titles including:

  • General Human Psychology, 2021
  • Sensuality in Human Living, 2020
  • Courageous Methods in Cultural Psychology, 2022
  • Dynamic Semiosis, 2024
  • Experimental Psychology, 2022

Additional book publications include:

  • Hyper-Generalization by the Human Mind, 2021, Psychosozial-Verlag eBooks
  • Hyper-generalization by the human mind: The role of sign hierarchies in meaning-making processes, 2020, King's College London

The researcher has collaborated frequently with the following colleagues:

  • Luca Tateo
  • Giuseppina Marsico
  • Marc Antoine Campill
  • Davood G. Gozli
  • Teppei Tsuchimoto

Best Publications

  • Understanding Vygotsky. A quest for synthesis

    René van der Veer;Jaan Valsiner

  • The Social Mind: Construction of the Idea

    Jaan Valsiner;René van der Veer

  • Culture and the Development of Children's Action: A Theory of Human Development

    Jaan Valsiner

  • The Development of Political Attitudes in Children

    Robert D. Hess;Judith V. Torney;Jaan Valsiner

  • The Vygotsky Reader

    R. van der Veer;J. Valsiner

  • Culture in Minds and Societies: Foundations of Cultural Psychology

    Jaan Valsiner

  • An Invitation to Cultural Psychology

    Jaan Valsiner

  • The Guided Mind: A Sociogenetic Approach to Personality

    Jaan Valsiner

  • The Oxford Handbook of Culture and Psychology.

    Jaan Valsiner

  • Changing Methodologies: A Co-constructivist Study of Goal Orientations in Social Interactions

    Angela Uchoa Branco;Jaan Valsiner

  • The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology

    Jaan Valsiner;Alberto Rosa

  • Forms of Dialogical Relations and Semiotic Autoregulation within the Self

    Jaan Valsiner

  • Between the General and the Unique: Overcoming the Nomothetic versus Idiographic Opposition

    Sergio Salvatore;Jaan Valsiner

  • Process Structure of Semiotic Mediation in Human Development

    Jaan Valsiner

  • From Methodology to Methods in Human Psychology

    Jaan Valsiner

  • Human Development in the Life Course: Melodies of Living

    Tania Zittoun;Jaan Valsiner;Dankert Vedeler;João Salgado

  • Dynamic process methodology in the social and developmental sciences

    Jaan Valsiner;Peter C.M. Molenaar;Maria C.D.P. Lyra;Nandita Chaudhary

  • The Individual subject and scientific psychology

    Jaan Valsiner

  • The Cambridge handbook of social representations.

    Gordon Sammut;Eleni Andreouli;George Gaskell;Jaan Valsiner

  • Culture and the development of children's action : a cultural-historical theory of developmental psychology

    Jaan Valsiner

  • Culture and human development : an introduction

    Jaan Valsiner

  • Human Development in the Life Course

    Tania Zittoun;Jaan Valsiner;Dankert Vedeler;João Salgado

Frequent Co-Authors

Miguel M. Gonçalves
Miguel M. Gonçalves University of Minho
Tania Zittoun
Tania Zittoun University of Neuchâtel
René van der Veer
René van der Veer Leiden University
George Gaskell
George Gaskell London School of Economics and Political Science
Tommy Gärling
Tommy Gärling University of Gothenburg
Alex Gillespie
Alex Gillespie London School of Economics and Political Science
Jonathan Tudge
Jonathan Tudge University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Vlad Petre Glaveanu
Vlad Petre Glaveanu University of Bergen
Michael J. Shanahan
Michael J. Shanahan University of Zurich
Alan Fogel
Alan Fogel University of Utah

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology online opens up versatile degree and career options. One rapidly growing field is what is forensic psychology, which applies psychological principles within the legal and criminal justice systems.

When choosing a program, understanding which accreditation is best for psychology is crucial. Accredited programs ensure quality education, recognition by employers, and eligibility for licensure.

Students must also select the right undergraduate path. Deciding between a ba vs bs psychology degree depends on your career goals—BAs suit broad interests, while BS degrees offer a greater science focus.

For those aiming for advanced practice, fast track online psyd programs let you complete your doctorate faster and enter the workforce sooner. These accelerated pathways can be a great option for motivated students.

Best Scientists Citing Jaan Valsiner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles