World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
56
Citations
16762
World Ranking
1860
National Ranking
331

George Gaskell publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George Gaskell sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 165 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

George Gaskell D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George Gaskell sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom

Overview

George Gaskell is affiliated with the London School of Economics and Political Science in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the social sciences, with a focus on interdisciplinary subfields including public health, environmental and occupational health, safety research, information systems and management, applied psychology, and transportation.

The main areas of study in Gaskell's work cover academic integrity and plagiarism, academic publishing and open access, human mobility and location-based analysis, ethics in clinical research, innovative human-technology interaction, AI in service interactions, and health and medical research impacts.

Gaskell has coauthored multiple papers with several collaborators. Frequent coauthors include Giuseppe Veltri, Miriam Bidoglia, Amalia de Götzen, Niels Mejlgaard, and Panagiotis Kavouras.

In terms of publication venues, Gaskell has contributed to journals and conference proceedings such as the Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Nature, Behavioural Public Policy, and Food Policy.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Gaskell illustrate the diversity of their research spectrum. These include:

  • "Research integrity: nine ways to move from talk to walk" (2020) published in Nature
  • "Generalization and Personalization of Mobile Sensing-Based Mood Inference Models" (2022) published in the Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
  • "The impact of online platform transparency of information on consumers' choices" (2020) published in Behavioural Public Policy
  • "Less is more: Information overload in the labelling of fish and aquaculture products" (2023) published in Food Policy
  • "Researchers on research integrity: a survey of European and American researchers" (2023) published in F1000Research

George Gaskell has been recognized as a Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences in the United Kingdom, an acknowledgment of their position in the academic community within the social sciences domain.

Best Publications

  • Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound

    Martin Bauer;George Gaskell

  • Classical Content Analysis: a Review

    Martin Bauer;George Gaskell

  • Towards a Paradigm for Research on Social Representations

    Martin W. Bauer;George Gaskell

  • Pesquisa qualitativa com texto, imagem e som: um manual prático

    Martin W. Bauer;George Gaskell

  • Worlds Apart? The Reception of Genetically Modified Foods in Europe and the U.S.

    George Gaskell;Martin W. Bauer;John Durant;Nicholas C. Allum

  • Biotechnology in the public sphere: a European sourcebook.

    J. Durant;M. W. Bauer;G. Gaskell

  • Qualitative researching with text, image and sound : a practical handbook

    Martin W. Bauer;George Gaskell

  • GM foods and the misperception of risk perception.

    George Gaskell;Nick Allum;Wolfgang Wagner;Nicole Kronberger

  • Biotechnology and the European public

    George Gaskell;Nick Allum;Martin Bauer;John Durant

  • A theory of risk colonization: The spiralling regulatory logics of societal and institutional risk

    Henry Rothstein;Michael Huber;George Gaskell

  • Biotechnology: The Making of a Global Controversy

    Martin W. Bauer;George Gaskell

  • Individual and Group Interviewing

    Martin Bauer;George Gaskell

  • Biotechnology 1996-1999 : the years of controversy

    George Gaskell;Martin W. Bauer

  • Europeans and Biotechnology in 2005: patterns and Trends

    G. Gaskell;S. Stares;A. Allansdottir;N. Allum

  • Europeans and Biotechnology in 2002

    George Gaskell;Nick Allum;Sally Stares;Martin W. Bauer

  • Social Representations Theory: A Progressive Research Programme for Social Psychology

    Martin W. Bauer;George Gaskell

  • Imagining nanotechnology: cultural support for technological innovation in Europe and the United States

    George Gaskell;Toby Ten Eyck;Jonathan Jackson;Giuseppe Veltri

  • Qualitative researching with text, image and sound: a practical handbook for social research

    Martin W. Bauer;George Gaskell

  • Europeans and Biotechnology in 2002. Eurobarometer 58.0. A report to the EC Directorate General for Research from the project 'Life Sciences in European Society' QLG7-CT-1999-00286.

    G. Gaskell;N. Allum;S. Stares;Jan M. Gutteling

  • The Cambridge handbook of social representations.

    Gordon Sammut;Eleni Andreouli;George Gaskell;Jaan Valsiner

  • Europeans and Biotechnology in 2010. Winds of change

    G Gaskell;S Stares;A Allansdottir;N Allum

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin W. Bauer
Martin W. Bauer London School of Economics and Political Science
Jonathan Jackson
Jonathan Jackson London School of Economics and Political Science
Jaan Valsiner
Jaan Valsiner Aalborg University
Herbert Gottweis
Herbert Gottweis University of Vienna
Jacqueline E. W. Broerse
Jacqueline E. W. Broerse Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Sonia Livingstone
Sonia Livingstone London School of Economics and Political Science
Julie E. Dockrell
Julie E. Dockrell University College London
Vincent Torre
Vincent Torre International School for Advanced Studies
Ralph L. Rosnow
Ralph L. Rosnow Temple University
James H. Liu
James H. Liu Massey University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring social sciences and humanities in the USA opens doors to a wide range of rewarding careers. Many students now prefer online education for greater flexibility and accessibility. Fields like social work and psychology, for instance, have seen significant growth in fully online degree options.

For those interested in social work, there are cheap msw programs online that offer excellent training without the high cost. If you're aiming for a fast completion, consider enrolling in a social work accelerated program. These programs can prepare you for impactful roles in a fraction of the traditional time.

For students seeking licensure in behavior analysis, accredited programs matter. Explore bcba accredited programs online to find reputable and affordable options. Alternatively, if psychology is your passion, a fast track bachelor degree in psychology can quickly set you up for careers in counseling, research, or human services.

With these options, you can tailor your education to fit your needs and ambitions while preparing for a meaningful career in the social sciences or humanities.

Best Scientists Citing George Gaskell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles