World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
34
Citations
4726
World Ranking
7598
National Ranking
2555

David A. Moeller publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David A. Moeller sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 72 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

David A. Moeller D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David A. Moeller sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

David A. Moeller is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with a focus on understanding ecological and evolutionary processes in plant species and their environments.

Their work extensively covers subfields such as Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecological Modeling, Genetics, and Ecology. These disciplines frame Moeller's contributions to topics including Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, Plant and Animal Studies, Species Distribution and Climate Change, Genetic Diversity and Population Structure, Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation, Evolution and Genetic Dynamics, and Seed Germination and Physiology.

Research output includes multiple publications in well-recognized venues, highlighting the depth and range of their investigations. Frequent publication outlets include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), American Journal of Botany, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), New Phytologist, and Evolution.

Selected recent papers authored or coauthored by Moeller include the following:

  • "Pleiotropy facilitates local adaptation to distant optima in common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia)" (2020), published in PLoS Genetics
  • "Deep learning detects invasive plant species across complex landscapes using Worldview-2 and Planetscope satellite imagery" (2022), published in Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
  • "Predicting range expansion of invasive species: Pitfalls and best practices for obtaining biologically realistic projections" (2020), published in Diversity and Distributions
  • "Microbes, mutualism, and range margins: testing the fitness consequences of soil microbial communities across and beyond a native plant's range" (2020), published in New Phytologist
  • "Improving predictions of range expansion for invasive species using joint species distribution models and surrogate co-occurring species" (2021), published in Journal of Biogeography

Frequent collaborators working alongside Moeller include Ryan D. Briscoe Runquist, Thomas A. Lake, John W. Benning, Amanda J. Gorton, and Lauren L. Sullivan. This indicates ongoing research partnerships contributing to diverse ecological and biological questions.

Best Publications

  • Plant mating systems in a changing world.

    Christopher G. Eckert;Susan Kalisz;Monica A. Geber;Risa Sargent

  • Facilitative interactions among plants via shared pollinators

    David A. Moeller

  • Correlated evolution of mating system and floral display traits in flowering plants and its implications for the distribution of mating system variation.

    Carol Goodwillie;Risa D. Sargent;Christopher G. Eckert;Elizabeth Elle

  • Ecological context of the evolution of self-pollination in Clarkia xantiana: population size, plant communities, and reproductive assurance.

    David A. Moeller;Monica A. Geber

  • ANALYSIS OF INBREEDING DEPRESSION IN MIXED-MATING PLANTS PROVIDES EVIDENCE FOR SELECTIVE INTERFERENCE AND STABLE MIXED MATING

    Alice A. Winn;Elizabeth Elle;Susan Kalisz;Pierre-Olivier Cheptou

  • GEOGRAPHIC STRUCTURE OF POLLINATOR COMMUNITIES, REPRODUCTIVE ASSURANCE, AND THE EVOLUTION OF SELF‐POLLINATION

    David A. Moeller

  • Pollinator community structure and sources of spatial variation in plant–pollinator interactions in Clarkia xantiana ssp. xantiana

    David A. Moeller

  • Reduced pollinator service and elevated pollen limitation at the geographic range limit of an annual plant

    David A. Moeller;Monica A. Geber;Vincent M. Eckhart;Peter Tiffin

  • Molecular evolution of plant immune system genes

    Peter Tiffin;David A. Moeller

  • The Geography of Demography: Long-Term Demographic Studies and Species Distribution Models Reveal a Species Border Limited by Adaptation

    V. M. Eckhart;M. A. Geber;W. F. Morris;E. S. Fabio

  • Global biogeography of mating system variation in seed plants.

    David A. Moeller;Ryan D. Briscoe Runquist;Annika M. Moe;Monica A. Geber

  • Correlations among Fertility Components Can Maintain Mixed Mating in Plants

    Mark O. Johnston;Emmanuelle Porcher;Pierre-Olivier Cheptou;Christopher G. Eckert

  • Context Dependence of Local Adaptation to Abiotic and Biotic Environments: A Quantitative and Qualitative Synthesis

    Ryan D. Briscoe Runquist;Amanda J. Gorton;Jeremy B. Yoder;Jeremy B. Yoder;Nicholas J. Deacon

  • Seed predation increases from the Arctic to the Equator and from high to low elevations

    A. L. Hargreaves;A. L. Hargreaves;Esteban Suárez;Klaus Mehltreter;Isla Myers-Smith

  • Rapid evolution of reproductive isolation between incipient outcrossing and selfing Clarkia species.

    Ryan D. Briscoe Runquist;Eric Chu;Justin L. Iverson;Jason C. Kopp

  • Genetic relationships among Native American maize accessions of the Great Plains assessed by RAPDs

    David Moeller;B. A. Schaal

  • Little plant, big city: a test of adaptation to urban environments in common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia)

    Amanda J. Gorton;David A. Moeller;Peter Tiffin

  • Population structure and its effects on patterns of nucleotide polymorphism in teosinte (Zea mays ssp. parviglumis)

    David A. Moeller;Maud I. Tenaillon;Peter Tiffin

  • Species distribution models throughout the invasion history of Palmer amaranth predict regions at risk of future invasion and reveal challenges with modeling rapidly shifting geographic ranges.

    Ryan D. Briscoe Runquist;Thomas Lake;Peter Tiffin;David A. Moeller

  • The ‘Hutchinsonian niche’ as an assemblage of demographic niches: implications for species geographic ranges

    Samuel Pironon;Samuel Pironon;Jesús Villellas;Jesús Villellas;Wilfried Thuiller;Vincent M. Eckhart

  • TEMPO AND MODE OF MATING SYSTEM EVOLUTION BETWEEN INCIPIENT CLARKIA SPECIES

    James B. Pettengill;David A. Moeller

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Tiffin
Peter Tiffin University of Minnesota
Monica A. Geber
Monica A. Geber Cornell University
Elizabeth Elle
Elizabeth Elle Simon Fraser University
Christopher G. Eckert
Christopher G. Eckert Queen's University
Susan Kalisz
Susan Kalisz University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Pierre-Olivier Cheptou
Pierre-Olivier Cheptou Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Richard H. Ree
Richard H. Ree Field Museum of Natural History
Jedediah F. Brodie
Jedediah F. Brodie University of Montana
Isla H. Myers-Smith
Isla H. Myers-Smith University of Edinburgh
John K. Kelly
John K. Kelly University of Kansas

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution in the USA opens doors to multiple interdisciplinary careers through online degrees and specialized bridge programs. Many students interested in environmental sciences often consider pivoting to healthcare or related fields, thanks to flexible online options. For instance, the SLP bridge pathway for communication sciences graduates provides a streamlined route for those with a background in communication sciences to transition into speech-language pathology.

Those interested in fast-tracked healthcare roles may look into accelerated nursing programs for non nurses. These programs are ideal for career changers with a bachelor’s degree in another field, enabling them to become registered nurses in a shorter time frame.

Graduates aiming for high-growth roles like nurse practitioners should consider not just program duration, but also potential earnings. Resources such as dnp psychiatric nurse practitioner salary and how long does it take to be a nurse practitioner provide valuable insights into state-by-state opportunities and career timelines.

Ultimately, related online degrees offer flexible pathways to rewarding science-based careers, expanding professional options for graduates with diverse interests.

Best Scientists Citing David A. Moeller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles