World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Desirée Schmuck

Desirée Schmuck

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 33 7116 6611 28 28 80 4527

Desirée Schmuck publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Desirée Schmuck between 2013 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Desirée Schmuck published across 13 years, from 2013 to 2025, averaging 6.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2021. 14 of the 83 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2013 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2021. 2013: 1 publication 2014: 1 publication 2015: 3 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 8 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 7 publications
2013 2025

83 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Desirée Schmuck: publications per year, 2013 to 2025
Year Publications
2013 1
2014 1
2015 3
2016 1
2017 8
2018 4
2019 7
2020 10
2021 18
2022 8
2023 8
2024 7
2025 7
Total 83
Download as CSV

Desirée Schmuck publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Desirée Schmuck sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 74–83 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 80 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225 80
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Desirée Schmuck D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Desirée Schmuck sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188 33
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • Misleading Consumers with Green Advertising? An Affect–Reason–Involvement Account of Greenwashing Effects in Environmental Advertising

    Desirée Schmuck;Jörg Matthes;Brigitte Naderer

  • Consumers' green involvement and the persuasive effects of emotional versus functional ads

    Jörg Matthes;Anke Wonneberger;Desirée Schmuck

  • The Effects of Anti-Immigrant Right-Wing Populist Ads on Implicit and Explicit Attitudes A Moderated Mediation Model

    Jörg Matthes;Desirée Schmuck

  • What drives interaction in political actors’ Facebook posts? Profile and content predictors of user engagement and political actors’ reactions

    Raffael Heiss;Desiree Schmuck;Jörg Matthes

  • “Too much to handle”: Impact of mobile social networking sites on information overload, depressive symptoms, and well-being

    Jörg Matthes;Kathrin Karsay;Kathrin Karsay;Desirée Schmuck;Anja Stevic

  • “Looking Up and Feeling Down”. The influence of mobile social networking site use on upward social comparison, self-esteem, and well-being of adult smartphone users

    Desirée Schmuck;Kathrin Karsay;Jörg Matthes;Anja Stevic

  • It’s us against them: a comparative experiment on the effects of populist messages communicated via social media

    Michael Hameleers;Desirée Schmuck

  • Effects of Economic and Symbolic Threat Appeals in Right-Wing Populist Advertising on Anti-Immigrant Attitudes: The Impact of Textual and Visual Appeals

    Desirée Schmuck;Jörg Matthes

  • The Mobilizing Power of Influencers for Pro-Environmental Behavior Intentions and Political Participation

    Unknown

  • How Anti-immigrant Right-wing Populist Advertisements Affect Young Voters: Symbolic Threats, Economic Threats and the Moderating Role of Education

    Desirée Schmuck;Jörg Matthes

  • The Effects of Environmental Brand Attributes and Nature Imagery in Green Advertising

    Desirée Schmuck;Jörg Matthes;Brigitte Naderer;Maren Beaufort

  • “Muslims are not Terrorists”: Islamic State Coverage, Journalistic Differentiation Between Terrorism and Islam, Fear Reactions, and Attitudes Toward Muslims

    Christian von Sikorski;Desirée Schmuck;Jörg Matthes;Alice Binder

  • Does Digital Detox Work? Exploring the Role of Digital Detox Applications for Problematic Smartphone Use and Well-Being of Young Adults Using Multigroup Analysis

    Desirée Schmuck

  • Longitudinal Effects of Excessive Smartphone Use on Stress and Loneliness: The Moderating Role of Self-Disclosure

    Kathrin Karsay;Desirée Schmuck;Jörg Matthes;Anja Stevic

  • Closer to the people: A comparative content analysis of populist communication on social networking sites in pre- and post-Election periods

    Desirée Schmuck;Michael Hameleers

  • Fighting over smartphones? Parents' excessive smartphone use, lack of control over children's use, and conflict

    Jörg Matthes;Marina F. Thomas;Anja Stevic;Desirée Schmuck

  • Negative Stereotypical Portrayals of Muslims in Right‐Wing Populist Campaigns: Perceived Discrimination, Social Identity Threats, and Hostility Among Young Muslim Adults

    Desirée Schmuck;Jörg Matthes;Frank Hendrik Paul

  • Start Spreading the News: A Comparative Experiment on the Effects of Populist Communication on Political Engagement in Sixteen European Countries:

    Michael Hameleers;Linda Bos;Nayla Fawzi;Carsten Reinemann

Frequent Co-Authors

Jörg Matthes
Jörg Matthes University of Vienna
Michael Hameleers
Michael Hameleers University of Amsterdam
Hajo G. Boomgaarden
Hajo G. Boomgaarden University of Vienna
Carsten Reinemann
Carsten Reinemann Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Jesper Strömbäck
Jesper Strömbäck University of Gothenburg
Frank Esser
Frank Esser University of Zurich
Toril Aalberg
Toril Aalberg Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Claes H. de Vreese
Claes H. de Vreese University of Amsterdam
Jane Suiter
Jane Suiter Dublin City University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Desirée Schmuck

Recently Published Articles