World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Desirée Schmuck

Desirée Schmuck

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
33
Citations
4527
World Ranking
7116
National Ranking
28

Desirée Schmuck publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Desirée Schmuck sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 80 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Desirée Schmuck D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Desirée Schmuck sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Misleading Consumers with Green Advertising? An Affect–Reason–Involvement Account of Greenwashing Effects in Environmental Advertising

    Desirée Schmuck;Jörg Matthes;Brigitte Naderer

  • Consumers' green involvement and the persuasive effects of emotional versus functional ads

    Jörg Matthes;Anke Wonneberger;Desirée Schmuck

  • The Effects of Anti-Immigrant Right-Wing Populist Ads on Implicit and Explicit Attitudes A Moderated Mediation Model

    Jörg Matthes;Desirée Schmuck

  • What drives interaction in political actors’ Facebook posts? Profile and content predictors of user engagement and political actors’ reactions

    Raffael Heiss;Desiree Schmuck;Jörg Matthes

  • “Too much to handle”: Impact of mobile social networking sites on information overload, depressive symptoms, and well-being

    Jörg Matthes;Kathrin Karsay;Kathrin Karsay;Desirée Schmuck;Anja Stevic

  • “Looking Up and Feeling Down”. The influence of mobile social networking site use on upward social comparison, self-esteem, and well-being of adult smartphone users

    Desirée Schmuck;Kathrin Karsay;Jörg Matthes;Anja Stevic

  • It’s us against them: a comparative experiment on the effects of populist messages communicated via social media

    Michael Hameleers;Desirée Schmuck

  • Effects of Economic and Symbolic Threat Appeals in Right-Wing Populist Advertising on Anti-Immigrant Attitudes: The Impact of Textual and Visual Appeals

    Desirée Schmuck;Jörg Matthes

  • The effects of populism as a social identity frame on persuasion and mobilisation: Evidence from a 15-country experiment

    Linda Bos;Christian Schemer;Nicoleta Corbu;Michael Hameleers

  • The Mobilizing Power of Influencers for Pro-Environmental Behavior Intentions and Political Participation

    Unknown

  • How Anti-immigrant Right-wing Populist Advertisements Affect Young Voters: Symbolic Threats, Economic Threats and the Moderating Role of Education

    Desirée Schmuck;Jörg Matthes

  • The Effects of Environmental Brand Attributes and Nature Imagery in Green Advertising

    Desirée Schmuck;Jörg Matthes;Brigitte Naderer;Maren Beaufort

  • “Muslims are not Terrorists”: Islamic State Coverage, Journalistic Differentiation Between Terrorism and Islam, Fear Reactions, and Attitudes Toward Muslims

    Christian von Sikorski;Desirée Schmuck;Jörg Matthes;Alice Binder

  • Does Digital Detox Work? Exploring the Role of Digital Detox Applications for Problematic Smartphone Use and Well-Being of Young Adults Using Multigroup Analysis

    Desirée Schmuck

  • Politics – Simply Explained? How Influencers Affect Youth’s Perceived Simplification of Politics, Political Cynicism, and Political Interest

    Unknown

  • Longitudinal Effects of Excessive Smartphone Use on Stress and Loneliness: The Moderating Role of Self-Disclosure

    Kathrin Karsay;Desirée Schmuck;Jörg Matthes;Anja Stevic

  • Closer to the people: A comparative content analysis of populist communication on social networking sites in pre- and post-Election periods

    Desirée Schmuck;Michael Hameleers

  • Fighting over smartphones? Parents' excessive smartphone use, lack of control over children's use, and conflict

    Jörg Matthes;Marina F. Thomas;Anja Stevic;Desirée Schmuck

  • Negative Stereotypical Portrayals of Muslims in Right‐Wing Populist Campaigns: Perceived Discrimination, Social Identity Threats, and Hostility Among Young Muslim Adults

    Desirée Schmuck;Jörg Matthes;Frank Hendrik Paul

  • Start Spreading the News: A Comparative Experiment on the Effects of Populist Communication on Political Engagement in Sixteen European Countries:

    Michael Hameleers;Linda Bos;Nayla Fawzi;Carsten Reinemann

Frequent Co-Authors

Jörg Matthes
Jörg Matthes University of Vienna
Michael Hameleers
Michael Hameleers University of Amsterdam
Hajo G. Boomgaarden
Hajo G. Boomgaarden University of Vienna
Carsten Reinemann
Carsten Reinemann Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Jesper Strömbäck
Jesper Strömbäck University of Gothenburg
Frank Esser
Frank Esser University of Zurich
Toril Aalberg
Toril Aalberg Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Claes H. de Vreese
Claes H. de Vreese University of Amsterdam
Jane Suiter
Jane Suiter Dublin City University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Desirée Schmuck