World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Political Science 26 1509 1380 78 74 113 4484

Carsten Reinemann publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Carsten Reinemann between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Carsten Reinemann published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 5.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2019. 4 of the 156 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2019. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 14 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 3 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 20 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 1 publication
1998 2025

156 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Carsten Reinemann: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 1
2000 3
2001 2
2002 0
2003 14
2004 2
2005 4
2006 4
2007 11
2008 5
2009 1
2010 3
2011 6
2012 3
2013 11
2014 11
2015 6
2016 8
2017 10
2018 8
2019 20
2020 4
2021 3
2022 7
2023 4
2024 3
2025 1
Total 156
Download as CSV

Carsten Reinemann publications per year - data summary

  • Carsten Reinemann, a Political Science scholar from Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, has 156 publications recorded across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1998 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2019, with 20 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1998, 1999, 2009 and 2025, with 1 publication each.
  • 1 of the 28 years in the span carries no publications at all (2002).
  • The rate of publication averages 5.6 papers per year over the whole span, or 5.8 per year counting only the 27 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 18 publications, 12% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1998-2007: 42 publications (4.2 per year); 2008-2017: 64 publications (6.4 per year); 2018-2025: 50 publications (6.3 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Carsten Reinemann publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carsten Reinemann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
20 40 60 80
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 333+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 97. Most scientists, 97, have 333+ publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–115 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36–40 publications 333+

This scientist: 113 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 10
41–45 11
46–50 25
51–55 27
56–60 44
61–65 52
66–70 62
71–75 62
76–80 79
81–85 71
86–90 82
91–95 65
96–100 85
101–105 76
106–110 66
111–115 78 113
116–120 67
121–125 73
126–130 73
131–135 64
136–140 45
141–145 53
146–150 44
151–155 45
156–160 33
161–165 32
166–170 28
171–175 31
176–180 29
181–185 27
186–190 36
191–195 27
196–200 24
201–205 16
206–210 16
211–215 19
216–220 16
221–225 17
226–230 18
231–235 23
236–240 17
241–245 13
246–250 17
251–255 9
256–260 13
261–265 8
266–270 12
271–275 8
276–280 10
281–285 13
286–290 13
291–295 5
296–300 6
301–305 11
306–310 9
311–315 6
316–320 4
321–325 4
326–330 2
331–332 5
333+ 97
Download as CSV

Carsten Reinemann publication distribution in Political Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 2,033 Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 61 ranges running from 36–40 to 333+ publications.
  • Carsten Reinemann, a Political Science scholar from Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, records 113 publications - the 42nd percentile of the discipline.
  • 42% of ranked Political Science scientists score the same or lower than Carsten Reinemann, and about 58% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 121–125 publications range, and Carsten Reinemann ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 333+ publications, holding 97 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 44% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 111–115 publications), so the distribution leans towards the lower end of the scale.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 333 publications or more, 97 scientists in all (5% of the field).

Carsten Reinemann D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carsten Reinemann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 43 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 62+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 100. Most scientists, 100, have 62+ D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 26 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 26 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 76
21 79
22 84
23 68
24 88
25 82
26 76 26
27 75
28 99
29 96
30 96
31 81
32 86
33 81
34 84
35 72
36 58
37 53
38 48
39 40
40 40
41 32
42 26
43 25
44 33
45 33
46 17
47 21
48 22
49 18
50 19
51 19
52 15
53 14
54 10
55 13
56 9
57 11
58 12
59 10
60 5
61 7
62+ 100
Download as CSV

Carsten Reinemann D-index placement in Political Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 2,033 Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 43 ranges running from 20 to 62+ D-Index.
  • Carsten Reinemann, a Political Science scholar from Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, records 26 D-Index - the 27th percentile of the discipline.
  • 27% of ranked Political Science scientists score the same or lower than Carsten Reinemann, and about 73% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 32 D-Index range, and Carsten Reinemann ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 62+ D-Index, holding 100 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 45% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 30 D-Index), so the distribution leans towards the lower end of the scale.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more, 100 scientists in all (5% of the field).

Best Publications

  • Political communication in a high-choice media environment: a challenge for democracy?

    Peter van Aelst;Jesper Strömbäck;Toril Aalberg;Frank Esser

  • Hard and soft news: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings

    Unknown

  • Populism as an Expression of Political Communication Content and Style: A New Perspective.

    Claes H. de Vreese;Frank Esser;Toril Aalberg;Carsten Reinemann

  • Spin doctors in the United States, Great Britain, and Germany metacommunication about media manipulation

    Frank Esser;Carsten Reinemann;David P Fan

  • Political Information Opportunities in Europe A Longitudinal and Comparative Study of Thirteen Television Systems

    Frank Esser;Claes H. de Vreese;Jesper Strömbäck;Peter van Aelst

  • Spin Doctoring in British and German Election Campaigns: How the Press is Being Confronted with a New Quality of Political PR

    Frank Esser;Carsten Reinemann;David Fan

  • It's the Debates, Stupid! How the Introduction of Televised Debates Changed the Portrayal of Chancellor Candidates in the German Press, 1949—2005

    Unknown

  • Unifying or Polarizing? Short-Term Effects and Postdebate Consequences of Different Rhetorical Strategies in Televised Debates

    Unknown

  • Reliability and Validity of Real-Time Response Measurement: a Comparison of Two Studies of a Televised Debate in Germany

    Jürgen Maier;Marcus Maurer;Carsten Reinemann;Thorsten Faas

  • Do the Candidates Matter?

    Unknown

  • Start Spreading the News: A Comparative Experiment on the Effects of Populist Communication on Political Engagement in Sixteen European Countries:

    Michael Hameleers;Linda Bos;Nayla Fawzi;Carsten Reinemann

  • Journalists as targets of hate speech. How German journalists perceive the consequences for themselves and how they cope with it

    Magdalena Obermaier;Michaela Hofbauer;Carsten Reinemann

  • Measuring and Explaining the Diversity of Voices and Viewpoints in the News

    Andrea Masini;Peter Van Aelst;Thomas Zerback;Carsten Reinemann

  • Der digitale Wandel der Wissensordnung. Theorierahmen für die Analyse von Wahrheit, Wissen und Rationalität in der öffentlichen Kommunikation

    Christoph Neuberger;Anne Bartsch;Carsten Reinemann;Romy Fröhlich

  • Routine Reliance Revisited: Exploring Media Importance for German Political Journalists

    Unknown

  • Perceiving threat and feeling responsible. How severity of hate speech, number of bystanders, and prior reactions of others affect bystanders’ intention to counterargue against hate speech on Facebook

    Larissa Leonhard;Christina Rueß;Magdalena Obermaier;Carsten Reinemann

  • Spin Doctors in the United States, Great Britain, and Germany

    Frank Esser;Carsten Reinemann;David Fan

Frequent Co-Authors

Frank Esser
Frank Esser University of Zurich
Toril Aalberg
Toril Aalberg Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Claes H. de Vreese
Claes H. de Vreese University of Amsterdam
Jesper Strömbäck
Jesper Strömbäck University of Gothenburg
Peter Van Aelst
Peter Van Aelst University of Antwerp
Tamir Sheafer
Tamir Sheafer Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Hajo G. Boomgaarden
Hajo G. Boomgaarden University of Vienna
Michael Hameleers
Michael Hameleers University of Amsterdam
Jörg Matthes
Jörg Matthes University of Vienna
Desirée Schmuck
Desirée Schmuck University of Vienna

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Carsten Reinemann

Recently Published Articles