World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Political Science 26 1553 1423 48 46 112 2300

Alessandro Nai publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Alessandro Nai between 2009 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Alessandro Nai published across 17 years, from 2009 to 2025, averaging 8.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2023. 38 of the 142 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2009 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2023. 2009: 4 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 21 publications
2009 2025

142 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Alessandro Nai: publications per year, 2009 to 2025
Year Publications
2009 4
2010 3
2011 0
2012 0
2013 4
2014 2
2015 5
2016 6
2017 4
2018 5
2019 11
2020 10
2021 17
2022 12
2023 21
2024 17
2025 21
Total 142
Download as CSV

Alessandro Nai publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alessandro Nai sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
20 40 60 80
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 333+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 97. Most scientists, 97, have 333+ publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–115 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36–40 publications 333+

This scientist: 112 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 10
41–45 11
46–50 25
51–55 27
56–60 44
61–65 52
66–70 62
71–75 62
76–80 79
81–85 71
86–90 82
91–95 65
96–100 85
101–105 76
106–110 66
111–115 78 112
116–120 67
121–125 73
126–130 73
131–135 64
136–140 45
141–145 53
146–150 44
151–155 45
156–160 33
161–165 32
166–170 28
171–175 31
176–180 29
181–185 27
186–190 36
191–195 27
196–200 24
201–205 16
206–210 16
211–215 19
216–220 16
221–225 17
226–230 18
231–235 23
236–240 17
241–245 13
246–250 17
251–255 9
256–260 13
261–265 8
266–270 12
271–275 8
276–280 10
281–285 13
286–290 13
291–295 5
296–300 6
301–305 11
306–310 9
311–315 6
316–320 4
321–325 4
326–330 2
331–332 5
333+ 97
Download as CSV

Alessandro Nai D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alessandro Nai sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 43 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 62+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 100. Most scientists, 100, have 62+ D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 26 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 26 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 76
21 79
22 84
23 68
24 88
25 82
26 76 26
27 75
28 99
29 96
30 96
31 81
32 86
33 81
34 84
35 72
36 58
37 53
38 48
39 40
40 40
41 32
42 26
43 25
44 33
45 33
46 17
47 21
48 22
49 18
50 19
51 19
52 15
53 14
54 10
55 13
56 9
57 11
58 12
59 10
60 5
61 7
62+ 100
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • Fear and Loathing in Populist Campaigns? Comparing the Communication Style of Populists and Non-populists in Elections Worldwide

    Alessandro Nai

  • Perceived personality and campaign style of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump

    Alessandro Nai;Jürgen Maier

  • Negativity, emotionality and populist rhetoric in election campaigns worldwide, and their effects on media attention and electoral success

    Jacques Gerstlé;Alessandro Nai

  • The personality of populists: provocateurs, charismatic leaders, or drunken dinner guests?

    A. Nai;F. Martinez i Coma

  • Going Negative, Worldwide: Towards a General Understanding of Determinants and Targets of Negative Campaigning

    Alessandro Nai

  • What really matters is which camp goes dirty: Differential effects of negative campaigning on turnout during Swiss federal ballots

    Alessandro Nai

  • The peculiar personality of strongmen: comparing the Big Five and Dark Triad traits of autocrats and non-autocrats

    Alessandro Nai;Emre Toros

  • Is Negative Campaigning a Matter of Taste? Political Attacks, Incivility, and the Moderating Role of Individual Differences:

    Alessandro Nai;Jürgen Maier

  • Donald Trump, Populism, and the Age of Extremes: Comparing the Personality Traits and Campaigning Styles of Trump and Other Leaders Worldwide

    Alessandro Nai;Ferran Martínez i Coma;Jürgen Maier

  • Dark necessities? Candidates’ aversive personality traits and negative campaigning in the 2018 American Midterms

    Alessandro Nai;Jürgen Maier

  • Roaring Candidates in the Spotlight: Campaign Negativity, Emotions, and Media Coverage in 107 National Elections:

    Jürgen Maier;Alessandro Nai

  • Dial ‘F’ for fraud: Explaining citizens suspicions about elections

    Jeffrey A. Karp;Alessandro Nai;Pippa Norris;Pippa Norris

  • Mapping the drivers of negative campaigning: Insights from a candidate survey:

    Jürgen Maier;Alessandro Nai

  • Populist voters like dark politicians

    Alessandro Nai

  • Why “Going Negative?” Strategic and Situational Determinants of Personal Attacks in Swiss Direct Democratic Votes

    Alessandro Nai;Pascal Sciarini

  • Attack politics from Albania to Zimbabwe: A large-scale comparative study on the drivers of negative campaigning:

    Chiara Valli;Alessandro Nai

  • Can anyone be objective about Donald Trump? Assessing the personality of political figures

    Alessandro Nai;Jürgen Maier

  • The Electoral Success of Angels and Demons: Big Five, Dark Triad, and Performance at the Ballot Box

    Alessandro Nai

  • Disagreeable narcissists, extroverted psychopaths, and elections: a new dataset to measure the personality of candidates worldwide

    Alessandro Nai

  • Anxiety, Sophistication, and Resistance to Persuasion: Evidence from a Quasi‐Experimental Survey on Global Climate Change

    Alessandro Nai;Yves Schemeil;Jean-Louis Marie

Frequent Co-Authors

Pippa Norris
Pippa Norris Harvard University
Marco Giugni
Marco Giugni University of Geneva
Pascal Sciarini
Pascal Sciarini University of Geneva
Jeffrey A. Karp
Jeffrey A. Karp Brunel University London
Donatella Della Porta
Donatella Della Porta Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa
Anke Tresch
Anke Tresch University of Lausanne
F. Martinez i Coma
F. Martinez i Coma Griffith University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Alessandro Nai

Recently Published Articles