World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 47 3385 3117 1632 1479 228 9593

Raymond De Vries publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Raymond De Vries between 1981 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Raymond De Vries published across 45 years, from 1981 to 2025, averaging 6.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2017. 14 of the 273 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2017. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 3 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 20 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 3 publications
1981 2025

273 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Raymond De Vries: publications per year, 1981 to 2025
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 1
1999 0
2000 0
2001 1
2002 3
2003 3
2004 4
2005 5
2006 6
2007 5
2008 12
2009 17
2010 10
2011 9
2012 10
2013 14
2014 10
2015 19
2016 14
2017 20
2018 15
2019 20
2020 18
2021 17
2022 13
2023 12
2024 11
2025 3
Total 273
Download as CSV

Raymond De Vries publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raymond De Vries sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 224–233 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 228 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213 228
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Raymond De Vries D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raymond De Vries sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251 47
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Raymond De Vries is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their work spans multiple areas within the field of Medicine, with particular focus on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Economics and Econometrics.

The scientist's research covers a variety of main topics including:

  • Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Ethics in Medical Practice
  • Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Patient Dignity and Privacy
  • Eosinophilic Esophagitis

De Vries has published extensively, with some recent papers as examples:

  • "Sources of information used by women during pregnancy and the perceived quality," 2022, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
  • "Physicians' Perceptions of Proton Pump Inhibitor Risks and Recommendations to Discontinue: A National Survey," 2020, The American Journal of Gastroenterology
  • "Perinatal factors related to pregnancy and childbirth satisfaction: a prospective cohort study," 2020, Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology
  • "Women's characteristics and care outcomes of caseload midwifery care in the Netherlands: a retrospective cohort study," 2020, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
  • "The paradoxes of communication and collaboration in maternity care: A video-reflexivity study with professionals and parents," 2020, Women and Birth

They have contributed to scholarly journals with multiple publications appearing in notable venues such as:

  • Gastroenterology
  • The American Journal of Gastroenterology
  • Women and Birth
  • JCO Oncology Practice
  • BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Frequent coauthors collaborating with De Vries include:

  • Marianne Nieuwenhuijze
  • Kerry A. Ryan
  • Sameer D. Saini
  • Chris Krenz
  • Jacob E. Kurlander

The volume and areas of publications reflect a concentrated engagement in issues related to maternal and child health, ethics in medical contexts, and communication in healthcare settings.

Best Publications

  • Scientists behaving badly

    Brian C. Martinson;Melissa S. Anderson;Raymond de Vries

  • The perverse effects of competition on scientists' work and relationships.

    Melissa S. Anderson;Emily A. Ronning;Raymond De Vries;Brian C. Martinson

  • Normal Misbehavior: Scientists Talk about the Ethics of Research.

    Raymond De Vries;Melissa S. Anderson;Brian C. Martinson

  • The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Methods in Health Research

    Ivy Lynn Bourgeault;Robert Dingwall;Raymond De Vries

  • What do mentoring and training in the responsible conduct of research have to do with scientists' misbehavior? Findings from a National Survey of NIH-funded scientists.

    Melissa S. Anderson;Aaron S. Horn;Kelly R. Risbey;Emily A. Ronning

  • Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide of Patients With Psychiatric Disorders in the Netherlands 2011 to 2014

    Scott Y. H. Kim;Raymond G. De Vries;Raymond G. De Vries;John R. Peteet

  • Bureaucracies of Mass Deception: Institutional Review Boards and the Ethics of Ethnographic Research

    Charles L. Bosk;Raymond G. De Vries

  • Scientists' perceptions of organizational justice and self-reported misbehaviors.

    Brian C. Martinson;Melissa S. Anderson;A. Lauren Crain;Raymond De Vries

  • Extending the Mertonian Norms: Scientists' Subscription to Norms of Research

    Melissa S. Anderson;Emily A. Ronning;Raymond De Vries;Brian C. Martinson

  • Normative dissonance in science: results from a national survey of u.s. Scientists.

    Melissa S Anderson;Brian C Martinson;Raymond De Vries

  • Understanding the social organisation of maternity care systems: midwifery as a touchstone

    Cecilia Benoit;Sirpa Wrede;Ivy Bourgeault;Jane Sandall

  • Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium: Accelerating Evidence-Based Practice of Genomic Medicine

    Robert C. Green;Robert C. Green;Katrina A.B. Goddard;Gail P. Jarvik;Laura M. Amendola

  • How Can We Help? From “Sociology in” to “Sociology of” Bioethics

    Raymond De Vries

  • The Importance of Organizational Justice in Ensuring Research Integrity

    Brian C. Martinson;A. Lauren Crain;Raymond De Vries;Melissa S. Anderson

  • 'Nobody tosses a dwarf!' The relation between the empirical and the normative reexamined.

    Carlo Leget;Pascal Borry;Raymond De Vries

  • Assessing the Quality of Democratic Deliberation: A Case Study of Public Deliberation on the Ethics of Surrogate Consent for Research

    Raymond De Vries;Aimee Stanczyk;Ian F. Wall;Rebecca Uhlmann

  • Respect for cultural diversity in bioethics is an ethical imperative

    Subrata Chattopadhyay;Raymond De Vries

  • The social and cultural shaping of medical evidence: case studies from pharmaceutical research and obstetric science

    Raymond De Vries;Trudo Lemmens

  • Decentred comparative research: Context sensitive analysis of maternal health care.

    Sirpa Wrede;Cecilia Benoit;Ivy Lynn Bourgeault;Edwin R. van Teijlingen

  • On speaking terms: a Delphi study on shared decision-making in maternity care

    Marianne J Nieuwenhuijze;Irene Korstjens;Ank de Jonge;Raymond de Vries

Frequent Co-Authors

Scott Y. H. Kim
Scott Y. H. Kim National Institutes of Health
Karl Kieburtz
Karl Kieburtz University of Rochester Medical Center
Paul S. Appelbaum
Paul S. Appelbaum Columbia University
Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher
Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
J. Scott Roberts
J. Scott Roberts University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Sharon L.R. Kardia
Sharon L.R. Kardia University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Edwin van Teijlingen
Edwin van Teijlingen Bournemouth University
David S. Knopman
David S. Knopman Mayo Clinic
Arul M. Chinnaiyan
Arul M. Chinnaiyan University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Reshma Jagsi
Reshma Jagsi University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities opens up diverse opportunities in areas like counseling, therapy, psychology, and social work. Online degree programs provide flexible paths for students aiming to build rewarding careers while balancing other commitments.

Those interested in becoming licensed counselors can look into cacrep-accredited programs online, which help meet professional standards required in many states. For anyone drawn to family dynamics and relationship counseling, earning a marriage and family therapy certification online is a strong pathway to clinical practice.

If you are fascinated by human behavior, consider pursuing an online degree in psychology to open doors in counseling, human resources, or research. Individuals eager to make a social impact can also choose from various msw programs with high acceptance rate, helping students enter the social work profession efficiently.

Whether your goal is professional licensure, supporting communities, or advancing to graduate study, these online programs provide accessible, affordable, and reputable options for your future.

Best Scientists Citing Raymond De Vries

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles