World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Edwin van Teijlingen

Edwin van Teijlingen

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 64 1079 941 206 183 595 21806

Edwin van Teijlingen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Edwin van Teijlingen between 1987 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Edwin van Teijlingen published across 39 years, from 1987 to 2025, averaging 17.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 53 publications in 2017. 51 of the 695 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 53. Peak 53 publications in 2017. 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 3 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 2 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 20 publications 2004: 24 publications 2005: 24 publications 2006: 33 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 20 publications 2009: 25 publications 2010: 33 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 23 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 39 publications 2015: 41 publications 2016: 40 publications 2017: 53 publications 2018: 34 publications 2019: 32 publications 2020: 42 publications 2021: 38 publications 2022: 22 publications 2023: 23 publications 2024: 35 publications 2025: 16 publications
1987 2025

695 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Edwin van Teijlingen: publications per year, 1987 to 2025
Year Publications
1987 1
1988 0
1989 0
1990 1
1991 0
1992 1
1993 3
1994 0
1995 1
1996 2
1997 2
1998 3
1999 3
2000 5
2001 4
2002 9
2003 20
2004 24
2005 24
2006 33
2007 13
2008 20
2009 25
2010 33
2011 15
2012 23
2013 15
2014 39
2015 41
2016 40
2017 53
2018 34
2019 32
2020 42
2021 38
2022 22
2023 23
2024 35
2025 16
Total 695
Download as CSV

Edwin van Teijlingen publications per year - data summary

  • Edwin van Teijlingen, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Bournemouth University, has 695 publications recorded across 39 years, from 1987 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1987 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2017, with 53 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1987, 1990, 1992 and 1995, with 1 publication each.
  • 4 of the 39 years in the span carry no publications at all (1988, 1989, 1991 and 1994).
  • The rate of publication averages 17.8 papers per year over the whole span, or 19.9 per year counting only the 35 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 134 publications, 19% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1987-1999: 17 publications (1.3 per year); 2000-2012: 248 publications (19.1 per year); 2013-2025: 430 publications (33.1 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Edwin van Teijlingen publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edwin van Teijlingen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 570+ publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 595 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100 595
Download as CSV

Edwin van Teijlingen publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 44–53 to 570+ publications.
  • Edwin van Teijlingen, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Bournemouth University, records 595 publications - the 99th percentile of the discipline.
  • 99% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Edwin van Teijlingen, and about 1% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 164–173 publications range, and Edwin van Teijlingen ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 114–123 publications, holding 474 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 174–183 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 570 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Edwin van Teijlingen D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edwin van Teijlingen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79 64
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Edwin van Teijlingen D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 71 ranges running from 30 to 100+ D-Index.
  • Edwin van Teijlingen, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Bournemouth University, records 64 D-Index - the 86th percentile of the discipline.
  • 86% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Edwin van Teijlingen, and about 14% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 45 D-Index range, and Edwin van Teijlingen ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 313 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more, 97 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Edwin van Teijlingen is affiliated with Bournemouth University in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a notable focus on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, and Infectious Diseases.

The scientist's recent publications reveal a focus on public health and epidemiological issues. Key papers include:

  • Impact of COVID-19 on clinical trials and clinical research: A systematic review (2020) published in Nepal Journal of Epidemiology
  • The Growing Importance of Mixed-Methods Research in Health (2022) published in Nepal Journal of Epidemiology
  • Caste Exclusion and Health Discrimination in South Asia: A Systematic Review (2021) published in Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health
  • COVID-19 Pandemic: Public Health Implications in Nepal (2020) published in Nepal Journal of Epidemiology
  • Building Strong Primary Health Care to Tackle the Growing Burden of Non-Communicable Diseases in Nepal (2020) published in Global Health Action

Frequent co-authors of Edwin van Teijlingen include:

  • Padam Simkhada
  • Pramod Regmi
  • Brijesh Sathian
  • Indrajit Banerjee
  • Bibha Simkhada

The scientist has contributed extensively to several publication venues, notably:

  • Nepal Journal of Epidemiology
  • Journal of Health Promotion
  • Health Prospect
  • Europasian Journal of Medical Sciences
  • Journal of Manmohan Memorial Institute of Health Sciences

Their research addresses a range of global health topics, including:

  • Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Healthcare Systems and Reforms
  • Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Global Health Care Issues
  • Health Policy Implementation Science

These areas reflect a comprehensive engagement with public health challenges, healthcare systems, and social determinants of health, often with a geographical focus on South Asia.

Best Publications

  • The Importance of Pilot Studies

    Edwin R. van Teijlingen;Vanora Hundley

  • Factors affecting the utilization of antenatal care in developing countries: systematic review of the literature

    Bibha Simkhada;Edwin R. van Teijlingen;Maureen Porter;Padam Simkhada

  • Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques.

    M Ryan;D A Scott;C Reeves;A Bate

  • Women's autonomy in household decision-making: a demographic study in Nepal

    Dev R Acharya;Jacqueline S Bell;Padam Simkhada;Edwin R van Teijlingen

  • The importance of conducting and reporting pilot studies: the example of the Scottish Births Survey.

    Edwin R. Van Teijlingen;Anne‐Marie Rennie;Vanora Hundley;Wendy Graham

  • Guide to the design and application of online questionnaire surveys.

    Pramod R Regmi;Elizabeth Waithaka;Anjana Paudyal;Padam Simkhada

  • Risk, theory, social and medical models: a critical analysis of the concept of risk in maternity care.

    Helen MacKenzie Bryers;Edwin van Teijlingen

  • Maternity satisfaction studies and their limitations: "What is, must still be best"

    Edwin R van Teijlingen;Vanora Hundley;Ann-Marie Rennie;Wendy Graham

  • A systematic review of school-based sexual health interventions to prevent STI/HIV in sub-Saharan Africa

    Virginia A Paul-Ebhohimhen;Amudha Poobalan;Edwin R van Teijlingen

  • Utilisation of postnatal care among rural women in Nepal

    Sulochana Dhakal;Glyn N Chapman;Padam P Simkhada;Edwin R van Teijlingen

  • Primary care staff's views and experiences related to routinely advising patients about physical activity. A questionnaire survey

    Flora Douglas;Nicola Torrance;Edwin R. van Teijlingen;Serena Meloni

  • Systematic reviews of and integrated report on the quantitative, qualitative and economic evidence base for the management of obesity in men.

    Clare Robertson;Daryll Archibald;Alison Avenell;Flora Douglas

  • The Qualitative Researcher's Companion:

    Edwin van Teijlingen

  • The role of mothers-in-law in antenatal care decision-making in Nepal: a qualitative study

    Bibha Simkhada;Maureen A Porter;Edwin R van Teijlingen

  • Factors Influencing Adherence to Antiretroviral Treatment in Nepal: A Mixed-Methods Study

    Sharada P. Wasti;Padam Simkhada;Julian Randall;Jennifer V. Freeman

  • A Critical Analysis of the Medical Model As Used in the Study of Pregnancy and Childbirth

    Edwin Roland Van Teijlingen

  • The Growing Importance of Mixed-Methods Research in Health

    Unknown

  • Impact of COVID-19 on clinical trials and clinical research: A systematic review

    Brijesh Sathian;Brijesh Sathian;Mohammad Asim;Indrajit Banerjee;Ana Beatriz Pizarro

  • “Is it realistic?” the portrayal of pregnancy and childbirth in the media

    Ann Luce;Marilyn Cash;Vanora Hundley;Helen Cheyne

  • More of the same? Conflicting perspectives of obesity causation and intervention amongst overweight people, health professionals and policy makers

    Joe Greener;Flora Douglas;Edwin van Teijlingen

  • Family communication about genetic risk: the little that is known.

    Brenda J Wilson;Karen Forrest;Edwin R van Teijlingen;Lorna McKee

  • Understanding the social organisation of maternity care systems: midwifery as a touchstone

    Cecilia Benoit;Sirpa Wrede;Ivy Bourgeault;Jane Sandall

  • Qualitative Research Practice

    Edwin van Teijlingen

Frequent Co-Authors

Jane Farmer
Jane Farmer Swinburne University of Technology
Ellen Nolte
Ellen Nolte London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Fiona Harris
Fiona Harris University of the West of Scotland
Mandy Ryan
Mandy Ryan University of Aberdeen
Siladitya Bhattacharya
Siladitya Bhattacharya University of Aberdeen
Paul Bissell
Paul Bissell University of Huddersfield
Raymond De Vries
Raymond De Vries University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Luke Vale
Luke Vale Newcastle University
Ivy Lynn Bourgeault
Ivy Lynn Bourgeault University of Ottawa
Blair H. Smith
Blair H. Smith University of Dundee

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the demand grows for flexible education, students pursuing Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA are increasingly considering online degree options. 1 year masters programs allow students to fast-track their education while gaining advanced knowledge in their chosen field, making them a compelling choice for working professionals or those seeking a quick career transition.

For those interested in completing an undergraduate degree faster, accelerated degree programs online offer an efficient pathway to start or elevate a career in areas such as psychology, social work, and related disciplines.

Cost is often a significant factor for students; affordable online degree options can be crucial. Programs like the cheapest online master's in social work help aspiring social workers earn credentials without incurring overwhelming debt. Similarly, those aiming to become board certified behavior analysts should explore bcba masters programs for flexible, budget-conscious opportunities.

Exploring these diverse online degree and certification routes can significantly broaden your career options in the social sciences and humanities, with flexible study formats and affordable paths to professional growth.

Best Scientists Citing Edwin van Teijlingen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles