World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
41
Citations
4816
World Ranking
5148
National Ranking
370

Jane Farmer publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane Farmer sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 206 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Jane Farmer D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane Farmer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jane Farmer is affiliated with Swinburne University of Technology in Australia. Their research spans multiple fields with primary focus on social sciences and health professions. Within these main fields, their publications frequently address general health professions and sociology and political science as subfields, as well as topics related to management of technology and innovation and artificial intelligence.

Their work extensively covers several main research areas. These include mental health and patient involvement, health disparities and outcomes, entrepreneurship studies and influences, community health and development, disaster management and resilience, global health workforce issues, and homelessness and social issues.

Jane Farmer has contributed to a variety of academic publications. Notable recent papers include:

  • What Is Rural Adversity, How Does It Affect Wellbeing and What Are the Implications for Action? (2020, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health)
  • How to systematically analyze co-production to inform future policies? Introducing 5Ws of co-production (2022, Public Administration Review)
  • Using micro-geography to understand the realisation of wellbeing: A qualitative GIS study of three social enterprises (2020, Health & Place)
  • Social media for social good? A thematic, spatial and visual analysis of humanitarian action on Instagram (2020, Information Communication & Society)
  • Are They Really a New Species? Exploring the Emergence of Social Entrepreneurs Through Giddens's Structuration Theory (2021, Business & Society)

Frequent coauthors with whom Jane Farmer has collaborated include:

  • Anthony McCosker
  • Peter Kamstra
  • Tracy De Cotta
  • Sue Kilpatrick
  • Debra Morgan

Key venues for publication where Jane Farmer's work appears regularly are:

  • OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)
  • AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Information Communication & Society
  • Journal of Rural Studies

Best Publications

  • Community participation in rural health: a scoping review

    Amanda Kenny;Nerida Hyett;John Sawtell;Virginia Dickson-Swift

  • Measuring oral health literacy: a scoping review of existing tools

    Virginia Dickson-Swift;Amanda Kenny;Jane Farmer;Mark Gussy

  • Processes of community-led social enterprise development: learning from the rural context

    Sarah-Anne Munoz;Artur Steiner;Jane Farmer

  • A scoping review of the association between rural medical education and rural practice location

    Jane Farmer;Amanda Kenny;Carol McKinstry;Richard D Huysmans

  • Sustaining the rural primary healthcare workforce: survey of healthcare professionals in the Scottish Highlands.

    Helen M Richards;Jane Farmer;Sivasubramaniam Selvaraj

  • Rural/urban differences in accounts of patients’ initial decisions to consult primary care

    Jane Farmer;Lisa Iversen;Neil C. Campbell;Clare Guest

  • Dr John has gone: assessing health professionals' contribution to remote rural community sustainability in the UK.

    Jane Farmer;William Lauder;Helen Richards;Siobhan Sharkey

  • Community participation for rural health: a review of challenges.

    Amanda Kenny;Jane Farmer;Virginia Dickson-Swift;Nerida Hyett

  • Social capital, rural nursing and rural nursing theory.

    William Lauder;Sally Reel;Jane Farmer;Harvey Griggs

  • Geographic distribution of primary care physicians in Japan and Britain.

    Masatoshi Matsumoto;Kazuo Inoue;Jane Farmer;Haruhiko Inada

  • Are rural health professionals also social entrepreneurs

    Jane Farmer;Sue Kilpatrick

  • Social enterprise and wellbeing in community life

    Jane Farmer;Tracy De Cotta;Katharine McKinnon;Jo Barraket

  • The social enterprise as a space of well-being: an exploratory case study

    Sarah-Anne Munoz;Jane Farmer;Rachel Winterton;Jo Barraket

  • Models of intrapartum care and women's trade-offs in remote and rural Scotland: a mixed methods study

    E. Pitchforth;V. Watson;J. Tucker;Mandy P. Ryan

  • Rural deprivation: reflecting reality.

    Jane Farmer;Anne Baird;Lisa Iversen

  • Workload pressures in rural general practice: a qualitative investigation.

    Lisa Iversen;Jane Farmer;Philip Christopher Hannaford

  • Territorial tensions: misaligned management and community perspectives on health services for older people in remote rural areas.

    Jane Farmer;Lorna Philip;Gerry King;John Farrington

  • Applying social innovation theory to examine how community co-designed health services develop: using a case study approach and mixed methods.

    Jane Farmer;Karen Carlisle;Virginia Dickson-Swift;Simon Teasdale

  • What older people want: evidence from a study of remote Scottish communities.

    Geraldine King;Jane Farmer

  • Community Co-Production : Social Enterprise in Remote and Rural Communities

    Jane Farmer;Carol Hill;Sarah-Anne Munoz

  • Citizen participation in health services co-production: a roadmap for navigating participation types and outcomes

    Jane Farmer;Judy Taylor;Ellen Stewart;Amanda Kenny

Frequent Co-Authors

Edwin van Teijlingen
Edwin van Teijlingen Bournemouth University
Fiona Harris
Fiona Harris University of the West of Scotland
Sarah Jack
Sarah Jack Stockholm School of Economics
Debra Morgan
Debra Morgan University of Saskatchewan
Luis Salvador-Carulla
Luis Salvador-Carulla Australian National University
Simon Teasdale
Simon Teasdale Queen's University Belfast
John M. MacDonald
John M. MacDonald University of Pennsylvania
Christine Bigby
Christine Bigby La Trobe University
Mandy Ryan
Mandy Ryan University of Aberdeen
Georgina Luscombe
Georgina Luscombe University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degree options can open up flexible career pathways for students interested in Social Sciences and Humanities. One popular choice is accelerated msw programs online, which allow you to fast-track your Master’s in Social Work and enter the workforce sooner. These programs are ideal for those interested in making a meaningful impact through social services.

For those passionate about understanding human behavior, the opportunity to earn an accelerated bachelor's degree psychology online can jumpstart a range of careers in counseling, research, and human resources. These programs are designed to be both efficient and rigorous, letting you finish your degree in less time.

Affordability is another concern for many students. Fortunately, there are options like the cheapest cacrep-accredited programs online, which provide high-quality, recognized counseling degrees at a lower cost. If you are interested in specializing, online marriage and family therapy masters programs offer convenient routes to careers in therapy and counseling.

By choosing the right online degree, students can align their education with their career goals in a flexible and affordable manner.

Best Scientists Citing Jane Farmer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles