| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | Current World Ranking | National Ranking | Current National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences and Humanities | 42 | 4794 | 4438 | 338 | 324 | 142 | 6665 |
The chart shows the history of publications by John Wakerman between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John Wakerman published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 5.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2017. 16 of the 160 publications appeared in the last two years.
160 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1995 | 1 |
| 1996 | 0 |
| 1997 | 0 |
| 1998 | 1 |
| 1999 | 3 |
| 2000 | 2 |
| 2001 | 3 |
| 2002 | 2 |
| 2003 | 2 |
| 2004 | 4 |
| 2005 | 5 |
| 2006 | 3 |
| 2007 | 6 |
| 2008 | 10 |
| 2009 | 8 |
| 2010 | 8 |
| 2011 | 6 |
| 2012 | 10 |
| 2013 | 4 |
| 2014 | 6 |
| 2015 | 11 |
| 2016 | 6 |
| 2017 | 13 |
| 2018 | 5 |
| 2019 | 6 |
| 2020 | 3 |
| 2021 | 4 |
| 2022 | 7 |
| 2023 | 5 |
| 2024 | 12 |
| 2025 | 4 |
| Total | 160 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Wakerman sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 142 publications — 37th percentile
37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 44–53 | 28 | |
| 54–63 | 61 | |
| 64–73 | 161 | |
| 74–83 | 225 | |
| 84–93 | 301 | |
| 94–103 | 390 | |
| 104–113 | 406 | |
| 114–123 | 474 | |
| 124–133 | 453 | |
| 134–143 | 434 | 142 |
| 144–153 | 407 | |
| 154–163 | 411 | |
| 164–173 | 391 | |
| 174–183 | 313 | |
| 184–193 | 319 | |
| 194–203 | 304 | |
| 204–213 | 285 | |
| 214–223 | 246 | |
| 224–233 | 213 | |
| 234–243 | 170 | |
| 244–253 | 167 | |
| 254–263 | 162 | |
| 264–273 | 138 | |
| 274–283 | 138 | |
| 284–293 | 113 | |
| 294–303 | 106 | |
| 304–313 | 95 | |
| 314–323 | 101 | |
| 324–333 | 81 | |
| 334–343 | 69 | |
| 344–353 | 56 | |
| 354–363 | 36 | |
| 364–373 | 42 | |
| 374–383 | 41 | |
| 384–393 | 44 | |
| 394–403 | 27 | |
| 404–413 | 30 | |
| 414–423 | 20 | |
| 424–433 | 29 | |
| 434–443 | 29 | |
| 444–453 | 25 | |
| 454–463 | 19 | |
| 464–473 | 21 | |
| 474–483 | 11 | |
| 484–493 | 17 | |
| 494–503 | 7 | |
| 504–513 | 6 | |
| 514–523 | 12 | |
| 524–533 | 10 | |
| 534–543 | 7 | |
| 544–553 | 6 | |
| 554–563 | 12 | |
| 564–569 | 8 | |
| 570+ | 100 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Wakerman sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 42 D-Index — 42nd percentile
42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30 | 177 | |
| 31 | 210 | |
| 32 | 222 | |
| 33 | 188 | |
| 34 | 181 | |
| 35 | 243 | |
| 36 | 261 | |
| 37 | 272 | |
| 38 | 278 | |
| 39 | 300 | |
| 40 | 297 | |
| 41 | 308 | |
| 42 | 313 | 42 |
| 43 | 300 | |
| 44 | 269 | |
| 45 | 260 | |
| 46 | 228 | |
| 47 | 251 | |
| 48 | 203 | |
| 49 | 186 | |
| 50 | 187 | |
| 51 | 166 | |
| 52 | 138 | |
| 53 | 141 | |
| 54 | 131 | |
| 55 | 137 | |
| 56 | 109 | |
| 57 | 129 | |
| 58 | 95 | |
| 59 | 105 | |
| 60 | 106 | |
| 61 | 86 | |
| 62 | 94 | |
| 63 | 77 | |
| 64 | 79 | |
| 65 | 59 | |
| 66 | 68 | |
| 67 | 51 | |
| 68 | 49 | |
| 69 | 40 | |
| 70 | 43 | |
| 71 | 40 | |
| 72 | 50 | |
| 73 | 46 | |
| 74 | 43 | |
| 75 | 45 | |
| 76 | 45 | |
| 77 | 30 | |
| 78 | 25 | |
| 79 | 31 | |
| 80 | 29 | |
| 81 | 18 | |
| 82 | 21 | |
| 83 | 26 | |
| 84 | 15 | |
| 85 | 15 | |
| 86 | 19 | |
| 87 | 19 | |
| 88 | 12 | |
| 89 | 7 | |
| 90 | 19 | |
| 91 | 20 | |
| 92 | 13 | |
| 93 | 9 | |
| 94 | 13 | |
| 95 | 8 | |
| 96 | 7 | |
| 97 | 6 | |
| 98 | 6 | |
| 99 | 6 | |
| 100+ | 97 |
John Wakerman is affiliated with Charles Darwin University in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on health professions and medicine, with specific contributions in the fields of general health professions, emergency medical services, public health, environmental and occupational health, health, and emergency medicine.
Wakerman's main topics of work include:
Their recent papers cover a range of subjects related to rural and remote health care, workforce retention, telehealth, and pandemic responses. These include:
Their frequent co-authors include:
Wakerman's research is often published in venues that focus on rural health and health services, which include:
Penelope Buykx;John Stirling Humphreys;John Wakerman;Dennis R Pashen
John Wakerman;John Stirling Humphreys;Robert Wells;Pim Kuipers
Lisa Bourke;John Stirling Humphreys;John Wakerman;Judy Taylor;Judy Taylor;Judy Taylor
Deborah Russell;Supriya Mathew;Michelle Fitts;Zania Liddle
John Wakerman;John Humphreys;Deborah J. Russell;Steven Guthridge
Maureen Dollard;Tessa Opie;Suzanne Lenthall;John Wakerman
John Wakerman
Deborah Russell;John Stirling Humphreys;Bernadette Maree Ward;Marita Chisholm
Susan L Thomas;John Wakerman;John Stirling Humphreys
Greg Rickard;Suzanne Lenthall;Maureen Dollard;Tessa Opie
Deborah J Russell;Yuejen Zhao;Steven Guthridge;Mark Ramjan
Geethanjali Piyawadani Ranmuthugala;John Stirling Humphreys;Barbara Solarsh;Lucie Walters
Lisa Bourke;John S Humphreys;John Wakerman;Judy Taylor
John Stirling Humphreys;John Wakerman;Robert Wells;Pim Kuipers
John Wakerman;John S. Humphreys
Jessamy Bath;John Wakerman
Sue Lenthall;John Wakerman;Tess Opie;Maureen Dollard
Anne B Chang;Paul J Torzillo;Naomi C Boyce;Andrew V White
Sue Lenthall;John Wakerman;Tess Opie;Sandra Dunn
Tessa Opie;Maureen Dollard;Sue Lenthall;John Wakerman
Yuejen Zhao;Susan L Thomas;Steven L Guthridge;John Wakerman
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
The Social Sciences and Humanities offer diverse online degree opportunities for students eager to pursue meaningful and impactful careers. Many programs, such as cacrep accredited programs, ensure rigorous training and prepare graduates for licensure and clinical practice in professional counseling.
For those interested in working with families and couples, earning a mft degree (Marriage and Family Therapy) online provides a flexible path to a rewarding field with high demand. Meanwhile, an online psychology degree can open doors to wide-ranging career options across healthcare, education, business, and research.
Additionally, pursuing a Master of Social Work (MSW) is increasingly accessible with msw schools that offer online programs known for their flexibility and support. Each pathway provides unique advantages, making it possible to align your education with your career goals while balancing other life commitments.
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
University of Copenhagen
Erasmus MC
Jain University
University of Malta
University of Giessen
University of Edinburgh
University of Cambridge
Philipp University of Marburg
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology
Imperial College London
Harvard University
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
University of Pennsylvania
National Autonomous University of Mexico
Universiti Putra Malaysia
