World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 37 9030 8434 531 519 103 9971

Michelle R. Tuckey publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michelle R. Tuckey between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michelle R. Tuckey published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 4.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2014. 8 of the 117 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2014. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 2 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 2 publications
2001 2025

117 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michelle R. Tuckey: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 2
2003 3
2004 0
2005 0
2006 1
2007 2
2008 1
2009 2
2010 3
2011 5
2012 7
2013 2
2014 13
2015 6
2016 7
2017 12
2018 5
2019 10
2020 4
2021 9
2022 6
2023 8
2024 6
2025 2
Total 117
Download as CSV

Michelle R. Tuckey publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michelle R. Tuckey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 103 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 103
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Michelle R. Tuckey D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michelle R. Tuckey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 37
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Michelle R. Tuckey is affiliated with the University of South Australia in Australia. Their research spans multiple disciplines within health professions, social sciences, and business, management, and accounting, with a focus on topics relevant to workplace dynamics and wellbeing.

The main fields of study include:

  • Health Professions
  • Social Sciences
  • Business, Management and Accounting

Within these broader areas, the subfields of study are:

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • General Health Professions
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Social Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology

Their work covers several key research topics, such as:

  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Workplace Violence and Bullying
  • Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Occupational Health and Safety Research
  • Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Healthcare professionals' stress and burnout

Recent publications include:

  • Linking objective and subjective job demands and resources in the JD-R model: A multilevel design, 2022, Work & Stress
  • Comparing effects of toxic leadership and team social support on job insecurity, role ambiguity, work engagement, and job performance: A multilevel mediational perspective, 2023, Asia Pacific Management Review
  • The role of psychological detachment in burnout and depression: A longitudinal study of Malaysian workers, 2020, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology
  • Problem solving and affect as mechanisms linking daily mindfulness to task performance and job satisfaction, 2020, Stress and Health
  • Workplace bullying as an organisational issue: Aligning climate and leadership, 2021, Work & Stress

Frequent co-authors in their research include:

  • Yiqiong Li
  • Maureen F. Dollard
  • Sarven S. McLinton
  • May Young Loh
  • Annabelle M. Neall

The scientist has contributed to the following venues multiple times:

  • Work & Stress
  • Journal of Occupational Health Psychology
  • Asia Pacific Management Review
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Scandinavian Journal of Psychology

In addition to journal articles, they have authored book publications, including a title released by Springer Nature:

  • Dignity and Inclusion at Work, 2021

Best Publications

  • Rethinking Maternal Sensitivity: Mothers’ Comments on Infants’ Mental Processes Predict Security of Attachment at 12 Months

    Elizabeth Meins;Charles Fernyhough;Emma Fradley;Michelle Tuckey

  • Maternal Mind–Mindedness and Attachment Security as Predictors of Theory of Mind Understanding

    Elizabeth Meins;Charles Fernyhough;Rachel Wainwright;Mani Das Gupta

  • Pathways to understanding mind: construct validity and predictive validity of maternal mind-mindedness.

    Elizabeth Meins;Charles Fernyhough;Rachel Wainwright;David Clark-Carter

  • Psychosocial safety climate as a lead indicator of workplace bullying and harassment, job resources, psychological health and employee engagement.

    Rebecca Law;Maureen F. Dollard;Michelle R. Tuckey;Christian Dormann

  • Empowering leaders optimize working conditions for engagement: a multilevel study.

    Michelle R. Tuckey;Arnold B. Bakker;Maureen F. Dollard

  • Job demands, work‐family conflict, and emotional exhaustion in police officers: A longitudinal test of competing theories

    Garry B. Hall;Maureen F. Dollard;Michelle R. Tuckey;Anthony H. Winefield

  • The influence of motives and goal orientation on feedback seeking.

    Michelle Tuckey;Neil Brewer;Paul Williamson

  • Psychosocial Safety Climate, Workplace Bullying, and Symptoms of Posttraumatic Stress

    Stephanie A. Bond;Michelle R. Tuckey;Maureen F. Dollard

  • Mindfulness interventions in the workplace: A critique of the current state of the literature.

    Stephanie D. Jamieson;Michelle R. Tuckey

  • National surveillance of psychosocial risk factors in the workplace: An international overview

    Maureen F. Dollard;Natalie J. Skinner;Michelle R. Tuckey;Tessa S. Bailey

  • Supervisory coaching and performance feedback as mediators of the relationships between leadership styles, work engagement, and turnover intention

    Michelle Chin Chin Lee;Mohd. Awang Idris;Michelle Tuckey

  • The influence of schemas, stimulus ambiguity, and interview schedule on eyewitness memory over time.

    Michelle R Tuckey;Neil Douglas Brewer

  • Psychosocial safety climate moderates the job demand–resource interaction in predicting workgroup distress

    Maureen F. Dollard;Michelle R. Tuckey;Christian Dormann

  • Workplace bullying: The role of psychosocial work environment factors.

    Michelle R. Tuckey;Maureen F. Dollard;Patrick J. Hosking;Anthony H. Winefield

  • A methodological review of research on the antecedents and consequences of workplace harassment

    Annabelle M. Neall;Michelle R. Tuckey

  • Group critical incident stress debriefing with emergency services personnel: a randomized controlled trial.

    Michelle R. Tuckey;Jill E. Scott

  • Hindrances are not threats: advancing the multidimensionality of work stress.

    Michelle R. Tuckey;Ben. J. Searle;Carolyn M. Boyd;Anthony H. Winefield

  • Emotions in uniform: How nurses regulate emotion at work via emotional boundaries

    Renae Maree Hayward;Michelle Rae Tuckey

  • Workplace bullying erodes job and personal resources: between- and within-person perspectives.

    Michelle R. Tuckey;Annabelle M. Neall

  • Psychosocial Safety Climate as a Management Tool for Employee Engagement and Performance: A Multilevel Analysis

    Mohd Awang Idris;Maureen F. Dollard;Michelle R. Tuckey

Frequent Co-Authors

Maureen F. Dollard
Maureen F. Dollard University of South Australia
Neil Brewer
Neil Brewer Flinders University
Anthony H. Winefield
Anthony H. Winefield University of South Australia
Paula Brough
Paula Brough Griffith University
Helen R. Winefield
Helen R. Winefield University of Adelaide
Akihito Shimazu
Akihito Shimazu Keio University
Robert J. Vandenberg
Robert J. Vandenberg University of Georgia
Arnold B. Bakker
Arnold B. Bakker Erasmus University Rotterdam
Janet Bryan
Janet Bryan University of South Australia
Sabine Sonnentag
Sabine Sonnentag University of Mannheim

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens up a range of online degree options and career paths, especially in counseling and mental health services. Many prospective students consider affordability as a major factor when choosing a program. For those seeking value, some of the affordable counseling programs in Indiana offer rigorous coursework at reduced costs.

Cities like Los Angeles also provide options for those wanting to study while managing expenses. The most affordable counseling degree programs in Los Angeles offer flexible online formats and diverse specializations in counseling and psychology.

Other states, such as Michigan, are also home to the cheapest counseling degrees in Michigan, supporting students interested in careers like school counseling, marriage and family therapy, or clinical psychology.

Similarly, students have access to the most affordable counseling degree programs in Minnesota, which can be a practical step toward professional licensure and meaningful, impactful work in mental health services.

Best Scientists Citing Michelle R. Tuckey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles