World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
44
Citations
12656
World Ranking
1333
National Ranking
19

Sarah Jack publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sarah Jack sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 115 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 180 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

Sarah Jack D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sarah Jack sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 67 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sarah Jack is affiliated with the Stockholm School of Economics in Sweden, where their research primarily focuses on business and social sciences. Their body of work encompasses 59 publications in Business, Management and Accounting, alongside 24 in Social Sciences. Within these fields, their expertise extends to subfields such as Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science, Accounting, and Economics and Econometrics.

The topics that Sarah Jack investigates often relate to Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences, with 42 publications in this area. Other significant areas of their work include Family Business Performance and Succession, Private Equity and Venture Capital, Management and Organizational Studies, as well as Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy. They have also addressed issues surrounding FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance, and the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Sarah Jack's recent publications include:

  • "Advancing Qualitative Entrepreneurship Research: Leveraging Methodological Plurality for Achieving Scholarly Impact," 2020, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice
  • ""Let them not make me a stone"-repositioning entrepreneurship," 2021, Journal of Small Business Management
  • "Understanding entrepreneurial opportunities through metaphors: a narrative approach to theorizing family entrepreneurship," 2020, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development
  • "Entrepreneurial space and the freedom for entrepreneurship: Institutional settings, policy, and action in the space industry," 2021, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal
  • "The synergy of causation and effectuation in the process of entrepreneurial networking: Implications for opportunity development," 2021, International Small Business Journal Researching Entrepreneurship

The venues where they frequently publish include:

  • Entrepreneurship and Regional Development
  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice
  • Small Business Economics
  • Technovation

Among their frequent co-authors are Danny Soetanto, Afua Owusu-Kwarteng, Allan Discua Cruz, Eleanor Hamilton, and Sarah Drakopoulou Dodd.

Best Publications

  • The effects of embeddedness on the entrepreneurial process

    Sarah L. Jack;Alistair R. Anderson

  • The Role, Use and Activation of Strong and Weak Network Ties: A Qualitative Analysis*

    Sarah L. Jack

  • The articulation of social capital in entrepreneurial networks: a glue or a lubricant?

    Alistair R. Anderson;Sarah L. Jack

  • Entrepreneurship education within the enterprise culture: Producing reflective practitioners

    Sarah L. Jack;Alistair R. Anderson

  • Approaches to studying networks: implications and outcomes

    Sarah L. Jack

  • The role of family members in entrepreneurial networks: beyond the boundaries of the family firm.

    Alistair R. Anderson;Sarah L. Jack;Sarah Drakopoulou Dodd

  • Change and the development of entrepreneurial networks over time: a processual perspective

    Sarah Jack;Sarah Drakopoulou Dodd;Alistair R. Anderson

  • Embedded entrepreneurship in the creative re-construction of place

    Edward McKeever;Sarah L. Jack;Alistair R. Anderson

  • Entrepreneurial social capital: conceptualizing social capital in new high-tech firms.

    Alistair R. Anderson;John Park;Sarah L. Jack

  • Network practices and entrepreneurial growth

    Alistair R. Anderson;Sarah Drakopoulou Dodd;Sarah L. Jack

  • An entrepreneurial network evolving: Patterns of change

    Sarah Louise Jack;Susan Moult;Alistair Anderson;Sarah Louise Drakopoulou Dodd

  • Entrepreneurship as connecting: some implications for theorising and practice

    Alistair R. Anderson;Sarah Drakopoulou Dodd;Sarah L. Jack

  • Entrepreneurship and mutuality: social capital in processes and practices

    Edward McKeever;Alistair R. Anderson;Sarah L. Jack

  • Social Capital and Entrepreneurship An Introduction

    Jason Cope;Sarah Jack;Mary B. Rose

  • Business incubators and the networks of technology-based firms

    Danny P. Soetanto;Sarah L. Jack

  • The impact of university-based incubation support on the innovation strategy of academic spin-offs

    Danny Prabowo Soetanto;Sarah Louise Jack

  • Role typologies for enterprising education: the professional artisan?

    Alistair R. Anderson;Sarah L. Jack

  • Social structures and entrepreneurial networks The strength of strong ties

    Sarah L. Jack;Sarah Drakopoulou Dodd;Alistair R. Anderson

  • Understanding entrepreneurial cultures in family businesses: A study of family entrepreneurial teams in Honduras

    Allan Discua Cruz;Eleanor Hamilton;Sarah L. Jack

  • Re-framing the status of narrative in family business research: Towards an understanding of families in business

    Eleanor Elizabeth Hamilton;Allan Fernando Discua Cruz;Sarah Louise Jack

  • Advancing Qualitative Entrepreneurship Research: Leveraging Methodological Plurality for Achieving Scholarly Impact:

    Elco van Burg;Joep Cornelissen;Wouter Stam;Sarah Jack;Sarah Jack

  • The Role of Family Members in Entrepreneurial Networks: Beyond the Boundaries of the Family Firm

    Alistair R Anderson;Sarah L. Jack;Sarah Drakopoulou‐Dodd

Frequent Co-Authors

Alistair R. Anderson
Alistair R. Anderson Lancaster University
Alain Fayolle
Alain Fayolle IDRAC Business School
Jane Farmer
Jane Farmer Swinburne University of Technology
Paul Robson
Paul Robson Royal Holloway University of London
Mark Freel
Mark Freel University of Ottawa
Stefanos Mouzas
Stefanos Mouzas Lancaster University
Joep Cornelissen
Joep Cornelissen Erasmus University Rotterdam
Mattias Nordqvist
Mattias Nordqvist Stockholm School of Economics

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

When exploring options to study Business and Management in the USA, you can find a variety of flexible pathways to boost your career. Online programs now allow students worldwide to gain valuable business skills from accredited institutions without the high costs or the need to relocate.

If you are interested in the intersection of business and construction, a degree in construction management offers specialized leadership and project management training for the growing construction sector. Those seeking senior leadership roles may want to consider an online executive mba, which focuses on advanced managerial strategies tailored for experienced professionals.

Affordability is key for many students. You can look into the least expensive online masters to find quality education at lower costs, helping you reduce debt while building employable skills. Technology-minded students might also benefit from a cheap online masters degree in data science, opening doors to roles in analytics, finance, and market research.

Exploring these online degree options can help you find the best fit for your professional goals and budget.

Best Scientists Citing Sarah Jack

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles