World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
50
Citations
10997
World Ranking
17514
National Ranking
609

Mary L. Berbee publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary L. Berbee sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 125 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Mary L. Berbee D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary L. Berbee sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mary L. Berbee is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with a significant body of work also in Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology.

Their expertise extends across several subfields of study, including Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Cell Biology, and Molecular Biology. The main topics covered in their research encompass Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions, Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases, Plant Diversity and Evolution, Protist Diversity and Phylogeny, Lichen and Fungal Ecology, Fungal Biology and Applications, and Silymarin and Mushroom Poisoning.

Mary L. Berbee has published in various scientific journals, notably:

  • Mycologia
  • American Journal of Botany
  • Nature Reviews Microbiology
  • PLoS ONE
  • New Phytologist

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Berbee include:

  • Ludovic Le Renard
  • Ruth A. Stockey
  • Christine Strullu-Derrien
  • Garland R. Upchurch
  • Anna Bazzicalupo

Selected recent papers authored or coauthored by Mary L. Berbee include:

  • Genomic and fossil windows into the secret lives of the most ancient fungi, 2020, Nature Reviews Microbiology
  • Phylogenetic analysis of the distribution of deadly amatoxins among the little brown mushrooms of the genus Galerina, 2021, PLoS ONE
  • Character evolution of modern fly-speck fungi and implications for interpreting thyriothecial fossils, 2020, American Journal of Botany
  • A new epiphyllous fly-speck fungus from the Early Cretaceous Potomac Group of Virginia (125-112 Ma): Protographum luttrellii, gen. et sp. nov., 2020, Mycologia
  • Three new species in Russula subsection Xerampelinae supported by genealogical and phenotypic coherence, 2024, Mycologia

The research contributions of Mary L. Berbee span diverse aspects of fungal biology including evolutionary studies, fungal ecology, and plant-fungal interactions. Their work intersects both modern molecular methods and paleontological evidence to deepen understanding of fungal diversity, evolution, and the role of fungi in ecosystems.

Best Publications

  • A phylum-level phylogenetic classification of zygomycete fungi based on genome-scale data

    Joseph W. Spatafora;Ying Chang;Gerald L. Benny;Katy Lazarus

  • Dating the evolutionary radiations of the true fungi

    Mary L. Berbee;John W. Taylor

  • Cochliobolus phylogenetics and the origin of known, highly virulent pathogens, inferred from ITS and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene sequences.

    M. L. Berbee;Mona Pirseyedi;S. Hubbard

  • Dating divergences in the Fungal Tree of Life: review and new analyses.

    John W. Taylor;Mary L. Berbee

  • Fungal Molecular Evolution: Gene Trees and Geologic Time

    Mary L. Berbee;John W. Taylor

  • Primer -- The Fungi

    Jason E. Stajich;Mary L. Berbee;Meredith Blackwell;David S. Hibbett

  • Fungal diversity notes 603–708: taxonomic and phylogenetic notes on genera and species

    Kevin D. Hyde;Chada Norphanphoun;Vanessa P. Abreu;Anna Bazzicalupo

  • Evolution of the fungal self-fertile reproductive life style from self-sterile ancestors

    Yun Sh;Berbee Ml;Yoder Oc;Turgeon Bg

  • Culturing and direct DNA extraction find different fungi from the same ericoid mycorrhizal roots

    Tamara R. Allen;Tony Millar;Shannon M. Berch;Mary L. Berbee

  • Preserving accuracy in GenBank

    Thomas D. Bruns;Meredith Blackwell;Ivan Edwards;Andy F.S. Taylor

  • Dating the molecular clock in fungi – how close are we?

    Mary L. Berbee;John W. Taylor

  • The phylogeny of plant and animal pathogens in the Ascomycota

    Mary L. Berbee

  • Is Penicillium monophyletic? An evaluation of phylogeny in the family Trichocomaceae from 18S, 5.8S and ITS ribosomal DNA sequence data.

    Mary L. Berbee;Atsuko Yoshimura;Junta Sugiyama;John W. Taylor

  • Two ascomycete classes based on fruiting-body characters and ribosomal DNA sequence.

    M L Berbee;J W Taylor

  • Loculoascomycete origins and evolution of filamentous ascomycete morphology based on 18S rRNA gene sequence data.

    M L Berbee

  • Early Diverging Fungi: Diversity and Impact at the Dawn of Terrestrial Life.

    Mary L. Berbee;Timothy Y. James;Christine Strullu-Derrien

  • Phylogenomic Analyses Indicate that Early Fungi Evolved Digesting Cell Walls of Algal Ancestors of Land Plants

    Ying-Ying Chang;Sishuo Wang;Satoshi Sekimoto;Satoshi Sekimoto;Andrea L. Aerts

  • Preserving accuracy in GenBank

    M. I. Bidartondo;Thomas D. Bruns;Meredith Blackwell;Ivan Edwards

  • Convergence in ascospore discharge mechanism among pyrenomycete fungi based on 18S ribosomal RNA gene sequence.

    Mary L. Berbee;John W. Taylor

  • Labyrinthulomycetes phylogeny and its implications for the evolutionary loss of chloroplasts and gain of ectoplasmic gliding.

    Clement K.M. Tsui;Wyth Marshall;Wyth Marshall;Rinka Yokoyama;Daiske Honda

Frequent Co-Authors

John W. Taylor
John W. Taylor University of California, Berkeley
Joseph W. Spatafora
Joseph W. Spatafora Oregon State University
Jason E. Stajich
Jason E. Stajich University of California, Riverside
Ruth A. Stockey
Ruth A. Stockey Oregon State University
Matthew E. Smith
Matthew E. Smith University of Florida
Lynne Sigler
Lynne Sigler University of Alberta
B. Gillian Turgeon
B. Gillian Turgeon Cornell University
Meredith Blackwell
Meredith Blackwell Louisiana State University
Timothy Y. James
Timothy Y. James University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Gregory Bonito
Gregory Bonito Michigan State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry in the USA can open doors to a range of specialized online degrees and career opportunities in health and science fields. Many students look for accelerated dietitian programs to jumpstart careers in nutrition and dietetics, enabling them to gain credentials faster and meet workforce demands sooner.

For those interested in leadership or business within healthcare, an MBA may be the right fit. Prospective students carefully compare healthcare mba cost to balance educational quality and affordability—a critical factor given the rising expense of advanced degrees.

Biochemistry graduates may consider non-traditional roles like medical coding, which offers stable job prospects. Comparing ccs vs cpc salary helps aspiring coders understand earning potential and certification requirements. In addition, learning medical.coding salary ranges provides valuable insight for those evaluating alternative healthcare careers.

With flexible online options and diverse career pathways, students in Biology and Biochemistry can tailor their education for roles in nutrition, healthcare management, or medical coding, ensuring rewarding and impactful futures.

Best Scientists Citing Mary L. Berbee

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles