World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
56
Citations
12997
World Ranking
4482
National Ranking
2030

John G. Keilp publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John G. Keilp sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 168 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

John G. Keilp D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John G. Keilp sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

John G. Keilp is affiliated with Columbia University in the United States and conducts research primarily in the fields of Psychology, Medicine, and Neuroscience. Their work encompasses significant contributions to Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Pharmacology, Biological Psychiatry, and Psychiatry and Mental Health.

The research topics covered by John G. Keilp include:

  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Treatment of Major Depression
  • Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies

John G. Keilp has contributed to several recent papers, including:

  • Detecting suicidal thoughts: The power of ecological momentary assessment, 2020, Depression and Anxiety
  • Assessment of Relationship of Ketamine Dose With Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy of Glx and GABA Responses in Adults With Major Depression, 2020, JAMA Network Open
  • A qualitative systematic review of neurocognition in suicide ideators and attempters: Implications for cognitive-based psychotherapeutic interventions, 2021, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • Relationship of stress-reactive cortisol to suicidal intent of prior attempts in major depression, 2023, Psychiatry Research
  • Delay discounting in suicidal behavior: Myopic preference or inconsistent valuation?, 2021, Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science

The scientist frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Psychiatry Research
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Hanga Galfalvy
  • J. John Mann
  • Bárbara Stanley
  • Ainsley K. Burke
  • Michael F. Grunebaum

Best Publications

  • Prefrontal dopamine D1 receptors and working memory in schizophrenia.

    Anissa Abi-Dargham;Osama Mawlawi;Ilise Lombardo;Roberto Gil

  • The cognitive effects of electroconvulsive therapy in community settings.

    Harold A Sackeim;Joan Prudic;Rice Fuller;John Keilp;John Keilp

  • Impaired attention, genetics, and the pathophysiology of schizophrenia.

    Unknown

  • A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of repeated IV antibiotic therapy for Lyme encephalopathy

    Brian A. Fallon;John G. Keilp;Kathy M. Corbera;Eva Petkova

  • Structural abnormalities of subicular dendrites in subjects with schizophrenia and mood disorders: preliminary findings.

    Gorazd Rosoklija;Glen Toomayan;Steven P. Ellis;John Keilp

  • Neuropsychological dysfunction in depressed suicide attempters.

    John G. Keilp;Harold A. Sackeim;Beth S. Brodsky;Maria A. Oquendo

  • Ketamine for Rapid Reduction of Suicidal Thoughts in Major Depression: A Midazolam-Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial

    Michael F. Grunebaum;Hanga C. Galfalvy;Tse-Hwei Choo;John G. Keilp

  • Positron emission tomography of regional brain metabolic responses to a serotonergic challenge and lethality of suicide attempts in major depression.

    Maria A. Oquendo;Giovanni P. A. Placidi;Kevin M. Malone;Carl Campbell

  • Neuropsychological function and suicidal behavior: attention control, memory and executive dysfunction in suicide attempt

    J. G. Keilp;M. Gorlyn;M. Russell;M. A. Oquendo

  • Catechol-O-Methyltransferase (COMT) Genotypes and Working Memory: Associations with Differing Cognitive Operations

    Gerard E. Bruder;John G. Keilp;John G. Keilp;Haiyan Xu;Marina Shikhman

  • Attention Deficit in Depressed Suicide Attempters

    John G. Keilp;Marianne Gorlyn;Maria A. Oquendo;Ainsley K. Burke

  • A brain imaging (single photon emission computerized tomography) study of semantic and affective processing in psychopaths

    Joanne Intrator;Joanne Intrator;Robert Hare;Peter Stritzke;Kirsten Brichtswein

  • Neuroanatomic correlates of psychopathologic components of major depressive disorder.

    Matthew S. Milak;Ramin V. Parsey;John Keilp;Maria A. Oquendo

  • A controlled study of the antidepressant efficacy and side effects of (-)-deprenyl. A selective monoamine oxidase inhibitor.

    J. John Mann;Shelley Fox Aarons;Philip J. Wilner;John G. Keilp

  • Severity and Variability of Depression Symptoms Predicting Suicide Attempt in High-Risk Individuals.

    Nadine M. Melhem;Giovanna Porta;Maria A. Oquendo;Jamie Zelazny

  • The effects of vagus nerve stimulation on cognitive performance in patients with treatment-resistant depression.

    H A Sackeim;J G Keilp;A J Rush;M S George

  • Correlates of trait impulsiveness in performance measures and neuropsychological tests

    John G. Keilp;Harold A. Sackeim;J. John Mann

  • Blunted serotonergic responsivity in depressed inpatients.

    J. John Mann;P. Anne McBride;Kevin M. Malone;Michael DeMeo

  • Response inhibition predicts poor antidepressant treatment response in very old depressed patients.

    Joel R. Sneed;Steven P. Roose;John G. Keilp;K Ranga Rama Krishnan

  • Ketamine versus midazolam in bipolar depression with suicidal thoughts: A pilot midazolam‐controlled randomized clinical trial

    Michael F. Grunebaum;Steven P. Ellis;John G. Keilp;Vivek K. Moitra

  • Aggressiveness, not impulsiveness or hostility, distinguishes suicide attempters with major depression

    John G. Keilp;Marianne Gorlyn;Maria A. Oquendo;Beth Brodsky

  • Selective cognitive deficits in obsessive‐compulsive disorder compared to panic disorder with agoraphobia

    Maura Boldrini;L. Del Pace;G. P A Placidi;J. Keilp

Frequent Co-Authors

Maria A. Oquendo
Maria A. Oquendo University of Pennsylvania
Barbara Stanley
Barbara Stanley Columbia University
J. John Mann
J. John Mann Columbia University
Hanga Galfalvy
Hanga Galfalvy Columbia University
Brian A. Fallon
Brian A. Fallon Columbia University
Thomas B. Cooper
Thomas B. Cooper Columbia University
Gerard E. Bruder
Gerard E. Bruder Columbia University
Joel R. Sneed
Joel R. Sneed Queens College, CUNY
David A. Brent
David A. Brent University of Pittsburgh
Beth S. Brodsky
Beth S. Brodsky Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience opens doors to a variety of professional pathways in mental health and counseling. For those interested in guiding students, the university of the cumberlands school counseling program is one popular option, providing specialized online training to future school counselors.

Many students aiming for flexible education choose an online counseling degree. These programs cover core foundations of psychology and mental health, and are designed for those who want to help individuals and communities through therapeutic practice.

If you’re interested in working with families or couples, consider a pathway through marriage and family therapy master's programs. These online programs emphasize support for diverse relationships and practical skills for hands-on therapy.

For a broader approach to mental health, an affordable online masters in clinical psychology can help you build essential diagnostic and treatment skills, preparing you for roles in various mental health settings. Exploring these online degree options allows neuroscience students and professionals to expand their career choices and reach underserved communities through accessible, flexible education.

Best Scientists Citing John G. Keilp

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles