World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jennifer G. Murphy

Jennifer G. Murphy

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
57
Citations
7733
World Ranking
3548
National Ranking
145

Jennifer G. Murphy publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jennifer G. Murphy sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 169 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Jennifer G. Murphy D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jennifer G. Murphy sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jennifer G. Murphy is a researcher affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada specializing in Earth and Planetary Sciences as well as Environmental Science. Their research spans multiple subfields including Atmospheric Science, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Global and Planetary Change, Environmental Engineering, and Oceanography.

The scientist's work primarily addresses topics related to atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, with a focus on areas such as Air Quality and Health Impacts, Atmospheric Ozone and Climate, Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, Atmospheric aerosols and clouds, Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting, and the impact of COVID-19 on air quality.

Recent publications by Jennifer G. Murphy include the following:

  • The complex chemical effects of COVID-19 shutdowns on air quality, 2020, Nature Chemistry
  • Laboratory Investigation of Renoxification from the Photolysis of Inorganic Particulate Nitrate, 2021, Environmental Science & Technology
  • Validation of IASI Satellite Ammonia Observations at the Pixel Scale Using In Situ Vertical Profiles, 2021, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Exploring the Global Importance of Atmospheric Ammonia Oxidation, 2021, ACS Earth and Space Chemistry
  • Kinetics of the oxidation of ammonia and amines with hydroxyl radicals in the aqueous phase, 2021, Environmental Science Processes & Impacts

Jennifer G. Murphy has collaborated frequently with researchers including Ye Tao, Kerri A. Pratt, J. Stutz, Markus Ammann, and A. Gannet Hallar.

The scientist has published regularly in several academic venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Faraday Discussions
  • Environmental Science & Technology
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • ACS Earth and Space Chemistry
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society

Best Publications

  • Field inter-comparison of eleven atmospheric ammonia measurement techniques

    K. von Bobrutzki;C. F. Braban;D. Famulari;S. K. Jones

  • Understanding ozone‐meteorology correlations: a role for dry deposition

    Sarah C. Kavassalis;Jennifer G. Murphy

  • Overview paper: New insights into aerosol and climate in the Arctic

    Jonathan P. D. Abbatt;W. Richard Leaitch;Amir A. Aliabadi;Allan K. Bertram

  • Isoprene emissions in Africa inferred from OMI observations of formaldehyde columns

    Eloise Ann Marais;Daniel J. Jacob;T Kurosu;T Kurosu;Kelly V. Chance

  • The complex chemical effects of COVID-19 shutdowns on air quality.

    Jesse H. Kroll;Colette L. Heald;Christopher D. Cappa;Delphine K. Farmer

  • The weekend effect within and downwind of Sacramento – Part 1: Observations of ozone, nitrogen oxides, and VOC reactivity

    J. G. Murphy;J. G. Murphy;D. A. Day;D. A. Day;P. A. Cleary;P. A. Cleary;P. J. Wooldridge

  • Improved characterization of gas-particle partitioning for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in the atmosphere using annular diffusion denuder samplers.

    Lutz Ahrens;Tom Harner;Mahiba Shoeib;Douglas A. Lane

  • Understanding the role of the ground surface in HONO vertical structure: High resolution vertical profiles during NACHTT‐11

    Trevor C. VandenBoer;Trevor C. VandenBoer;Steven S. Brown;Jennifer G. Murphy;William C. Keene

  • Nocturnal loss and daytime source of nitrous acid through reactive uptake and displacement

    Trevor C. VandenBoer;Trevor C. VandenBoer;Cora J. Young;Cora J. Young;Cora J. Young;Ranajit K. Talukdar;Ranajit K. Talukdar;Milos Z. Markovic;Milos Z. Markovic

  • Laboratory Investigation of Renoxification from the Photolysis of Inorganic Particulate Nitrate.

    Qianwen Shi;Ye Tao;Jordan E Krechmer;Colette L Heald

  • Characterizing a Quantum Cascade Tunable Infrared Laser Differential Absorption Spectrometer (QC-TILDAS) for measurements of atmospheric ammonia

    R. A. Ellis;J. G. Murphy;E. Pattey;R. van Haarlem

  • Influence of Oil and Gas Emissions on Summertime Ozone in the Colorado Northern Front Range

    Erin E. McDuffie;Erin E. McDuffie;Erin E. McDuffie;Peter M. Edwards;Jessica B. Gilman;Brian M. Lerner;Brian M. Lerner

  • An Odd Oxygen Framework for Wintertime Ammonium Nitrate Aerosol Pollution in Urban Areas: NOx and VOC Control as Mitigation Strategies

    C. C. Womack;C. C. Womack;E. E. McDuffie;E. E. McDuffie;E. E. McDuffie;P. M. Edwards;R. Bares

  • Contribution of Arctic Seabird-Colony Ammonia to Atmospheric Particles and Cloud-Albedo Radiative Effect

    B. Croft;G. R. Wentworth;R. V. Martin;R. V. Martin;W. R. Leaitch

  • Size distribution of alkyl amines in continental particulate matter and their online detection in the gas and particle phase

    T. C. VandenBoer;A. Petroff;M. Z. Markovic;J. G. Murphy

  • Long term changes in nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds in Toronto and the challenges facing local ozone control

    Jeffrey A. Geddes;Jennifer G. Murphy;Daniel K. Wang

  • Total Peroxy Nitrates (ΣPNs) in the atmosphere: the Thermal Dissociation-Laser Induced Fluorescence (TD-LIF) technique and comparisons to speciated PAN measurements

    P. J. Wooldridge;A. E. Perring;T. H. Bertram;F. M. Flocke

  • Ice nucleating particles in the marine boundary layer in the Canadian Arctic during summer 2014

    Victoria E. Irish;Sarah J. Hanna;Megan D. Willis;Swarup China

  • Chemical and aerosol characterisation of the troposphere over West Africa during the monsoon period as part of AMMA

    C. E. Reeves;P. Formenti;Charbel Afif;Charbel Afif;Gérard Ancellet

  • Organic Peroxides and Sulfur Dioxide in Aerosol: Source of Particulate Sulfate.

    Shunyao Wang;Shouming Zhou;Ye Tao;William G. Tsui

  • The influence of gas-particle partitioning and surface-atmosphere exchange on ammonia during BAQS-Met

    R. A. Ellis;J. G. Murphy;M. Z. Markovic;T. C. VandenBoer

  • An investigation of ammonia and inorganic particulate matter in California during the CalNex campaign

    Luke Daniel Schiferl;Colette L. Heald;John B. Nowak;John B. Nowak;John S. Holloway;John S. Holloway

  • Characterization and optimization of an online system for the simultaneous measurement of atmospheric water-soluble constituents in the gas and particle phases.

    Milos Z. Markovic;Trevor C. VandenBoer;Jennifer G. Murphy

  • New insights into aerosol and climate in the Arctic

    Jonathan P. D. Abbatt;W. Richard Leaitch;Amir A. Aliabadi;Alan K. Bertram

Frequent Co-Authors

Douglas A. Day
Douglas A. Day University of Colorado Boulder
Steven S. Brown
Steven S. Brown National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Claire E. Reeves
Claire E. Reeves University of East Anglia
Ronald C. Cohen
Ronald C. Cohen University of California, Berkeley
John B. Nowak
John B. Nowak Langley Research Center
Randall V. Martin
Randall V. Martin Washington University in St. Louis
William P. Dubé
William P. Dubé Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences
Jeffrey R. Pierce
Jeffrey R. Pierce Colorado State University
Patrick R. Veres
Patrick R. Veres National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Ann M. Middlebrook
Ann M. Middlebrook National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to a variety of interdisciplinary career paths. For those interested in spatial analysis and technology, pursuing one of the best GIS graduate programs can provide advanced skills in Geographic Information Systems, essential for environmental mapping and resource management.

For leadership roles in public sector and environmental policy, a focused degree such as a MPA one year program offers a streamlined path to gaining management expertise in government and nonprofit organizations dealing with environmental regulations.

Environmental studies often intersect with social systems and human behavior, making an online sociology degree another complementary option. Some of the best online bachelors in sociology programs provide valuable insights into societal impacts and environmental justice.

Finally, professionals seeking advanced educational leadership roles or research opportunities may choose an EdD without dissertation to accelerate their academic credentials while focusing on practical outcomes over traditional research.

Best Scientists Citing Jennifer G. Murphy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles