World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
40
Citations
6235
World Ranking
2068
National Ranking
135

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
40
Citations
6299
World Ranking
7340
National Ranking
459

Jacek Gondzio publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jacek Gondzio sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 153 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Jacek Gondzio D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jacek Gondzio sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jacek Gondzio is affiliated with the University of Edinburgh in the United Kingdom. Their research focuses on optimization methods and related computational techniques, spanning several fields and subfields of study.

The main fields of study relevant to Gondzio's work include:

  • Computer Science
  • Mathematics
  • Engineering

Within these broad domains, the subfields of study where Gondzio has contributed are:

  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Numerical Analysis
  • Computational Mechanics
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

Their research covers several key topics, including:

  • Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research
  • Matrix Theory and Algorithms
  • Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
  • Optimization and Variational Analysis
  • Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis
  • Topology Optimization in Engineering
  • Organ Donation and Transplantation

Jacek Gondzio has authored multiple papers, with recent publications illustrating diverse applications and methodological advances. Selected recent papers include:

  • "Truss geometry and topology optimization with global stability constraints," 2020, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
  • "Improved instance generation for kidney exchange programmes," 2022, Computers & Operations Research
  • "A new preconditioning approach for an interior point-proximal method of multipliers for linear and convex quadratic programming," 2021, Numerical Linear Algebra with Applications
  • "Sparse Approximations with Interior Point Methods," 2022, SIAM Review
  • "A Relaxed Interior Point Method for Low-Rank Semidefinite Programming Problems with Applications to Matrix Completion," 2021, Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna)

Jacek Gondzio frequently collaborates with several co-authors, with whom they have multiple joint publications. Notable frequent co-authors include:

  • Spyridon Pougkakiotis
  • Stefano Cipolla
  • Filippo Zanetti
  • Jörg Kalcsics
  • Maxence Delorme

Their work has appeared in a number of publication venues, reflecting a strong presence in journals and archives related to optimization and applied mathematics. Frequent venues comprise:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Computational Optimization and Applications
  • Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
  • Computers & Operations Research
  • EURO Journal on Computational Optimization

Best Publications

  • Interior point methods 25 years later

    Jacek Gondzio

  • Implementation of Interior Point Methods for Large Scale Linear Programming

    E.D. Andersen;J. Gondzio;C. Meszaros;X. Xu

  • Multiple centrality corrections in a primal-dual method for linear programming

    Jacek Gondzio

  • Regularized symmetric indefinite systems in interior point methods for linear and quadratic optimization

    Anna Altman;Jacek Gondzio

  • Preconditioning Indefinite Systems in Interior Point Methods for Optimization

    Luca Bergamaschi;Jacek Gondzio;Giovanni Zilli

  • Solving nonlinear multicommodity flow problems by the analytic center cutting plane method

    J.-L. Goffin;J. Gondzio;R. Sarkissian;J.-P. Vial

  • HOPDM (version 2.12) — A fast LP solver based on a primal-dual interior point method

    Jacek Gondzio

  • High-Performance Computing for Asset-Liability Management

    Jacek Gondzio;Roy Kouwenberg

  • Base Station Location Optimization for Minimal Energy Consumption in Wireless Networks

    Pablo Gonzalez-Brevis;Jacek Gondzio;Yijia Fan;H. Vincent Poor

  • Presolve Analysis of Linear Programs Prior to Applying an Interior Point Method

    Jacek Gondzio

  • Warm start of the primal-dual method applied in the cutting-plane scheme

    Jacek Gondzio

  • Implementation of Interior-Point Methods for Large Scale Linear Programs

    Erling D. Anderson;Jacek Gondzio;Csaba Mészáros;Xiaojie Xu

  • Parallel Interior Point Solver for Structured Linear Programs

    Jacek Gondzio;Robert Sarkissian

  • Matrix-free interior point method

    Jacek Gondzio

  • Parallel interior-point solver for structured quadratic programs: Application to financial planning problems

    Jacek Gondzio;Andreas Grothey

  • Inexact Coordinate Descent: Complexity and Preconditioning

    Rachael Tappenden;Peter Richtárik;Jacek Gondzio

  • Modelling and optimisation in European Kidney Exchange Programmes

    Péter Biró;Joris van de Klundert;David F. Manlove;William Pettersson

  • Exploiting structure in parallel implementation of interior point methods for optimization

    Jacek Gondzio;Andreas Grothey

  • Further development of multiple centrality correctors for interior point methods

    Marco Colombo;Jacek Gondzio

  • The Robust Vehicle Routing Problem with Time Windows: Compact Formulation and Branch-Price-and-Cut Method

    Pedro Augusto Munari;Alfredo Moreno;Jonathan De La Vega;Douglas José Alem

  • New developments in the primal-dual column generation technique

    Jacek Gondzio;Pablo González-Brevis;Pedro Augusto Munari

  • A second-order method for strongly convex $$ll _1$$ℓ1-regularization problems

    Kimon Fountoulakis;Jacek Gondzio

  • Matrix-free interior point method for compressed sensing problems

    Kimon Fountoulakis;Jacek Gondzio;Pavel Zhlobich

Frequent Co-Authors

Jean-Philippe Vial
Jean-Philippe Vial University of Geneva
David F. Manlove
David F. Manlove University of Glasgow
Peter Richtárik
Peter Richtárik King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Andrzej Ruszczyński
Andrzej Ruszczyński Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Reinaldo Morabito
Reinaldo Morabito Federal University of São Carlos
H. Vincent Poor
H. Vincent Poor Princeton University
John Thompson
John Thompson University of Edinburgh
Ioannis Krikidis
Ioannis Krikidis University of Cyprus
Tamás Terlaky
Tamás Terlaky Lehigh University
Bernard Mulgrew
Bernard Mulgrew University of Edinburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students studying Mathematics in the USA, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities. Many opt for business-focused programs, which complement analytical skills with management expertise. Those interested in combining math with business leadership might consider some of the easiest MBA programs available online, enabling smooth transitions into managerial roles.

Cost is a significant factor when choosing further education. Fortunately, there are highly regarded options such as the cheapest online DBA programs. These offer doctoral-level education with a focus on business administration without the financial burden of traditional programs.

For those leaning towards finance, mathematical foundations play a vital role. Pursuing one of the cheapest Masters in Finance programs online can create pathways into financial analysis, risk management, and investment banking.

Time efficiency is also important. Students can accelerate their studies through the shortest online MBA programs, gaining essential business skills in less time while maintaining strong mathematical proficiencies.

Best Scientists Citing Jacek Gondzio

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles