World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
33
Citations
7446
World Ranking
9405
National Ranking
3973

Tim Otto publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tim Otto sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 50 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Tim Otto D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tim Otto sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tim Otto is affiliated with Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science, contributing to topics that intersect urban and environmental health.

The main fields of study associated with their work include:

  • Environmental Science

Within this broader field, subfields of study include:

  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Speech and Hearing
  • Environmental Engineering
  • Social Psychology

Tim Otto's research topics address practical and interdisciplinary concerns such as:

  • Urban Green Space and Health
  • Noise Effects and Management
  • Urban Heat Island Mitigation
  • Color perception and design

The scientist has published papers focusing on the relationship between humans and their built environments, including studies on biophilia and memory representation. Recent publications are:

  • "Artificial Intelligence Evaluates How Humans Connect to the Built Environment: A Pilot Study of Two Experiments in Biophilia," 2024, published in Sustainability
  • "Memory Representation within the Parahippocampal Region," 2021, published by UNC Libraries
  • "AI evaluates how humans connect to the built environment: two experiments in biophilia," 2023, published in Preprints.org

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Tim Otto include:

  • Tobias M. Ramm
  • Mathias Werwie
  • Peter A. Gloor
  • Nikos Angelos Salingaros
  • Brian J. Young

Their work appears across several publication venues, reflecting an interdisciplinary approach spanning environmental and social sciences:

  • Sustainability
  • UNC Libraries
  • Preprints.org

Best Publications

  • Two functional components of the hippocampal memory system

    Howard Eichenbaum;Tim Otto;Neal J. Cohen

  • The hippocampus—what does it do?

    Howard Eichenbaum;Tim Otto;Neal J. Cohen

  • Complementary roles of the orbital prefrontal cortex and the perirhinal-entorhinal cortices in an odor-guided delayed-nonmatching-to-sample task

    Tim Otto;Howard Eichenbaum

  • Memory Representation within the Parahippocampal Region

    Brian J. Young;Tim Otto;Gregory D. Fox;Howard Eichenbaum

  • Learning-related patterns of CA1 spike trains parallel stimulation parameters optimal for inducing hippocampal long-term potentiation.

    Tim Otto;Howard Eichenbaum;Sidney I. Wiener;Cynthia G. Wible

  • Npas4 Regulates a Transcriptional Program in CA3 Required for Contextual Memory Formation

    Kartik Ramamoorthi;Robin Fropf;Gabriel M. Belfort;Helen L. Fitzmaurice

  • Neuronal activity in the hippocampus during delayed non-match to sample performance in rats: evidence for hippocampal processing in recognition memory.

    Tim Otto;Howard Eichenbaum

  • Learning and memory

    Daniel L. Alkon;David G. Amaral;Mark F. Bear;Joel Black

  • Erratum: The hippocampal memory system and its functional components: Further explication and clarification (Behavioral and Brain Sciences (1994) 17:3 (500))

    H. Eichenbaum;T. Otto;Neal J Cohen

  • Both pre- and posttraining excitotoxic lesions of the basolateral amygdala abolish the expression of olfactory and contextual fear conditioning.

    Graham Cousens;Tim Otto

  • Entorhinal-perirhinal Lesions Impair Performance of Rats on Two Versions of Place Learning in the Morris Water Maze

    Alan H. Nagahara;Tim Otto;Michela Gallagher

  • Hippocampus and olfactory discrimination learning: effects of entorhinal cortex lesions on olfactory learning and memory in a successive-cue, go-no-go task.

    Tim Otto;Tim Otto;Frank Schottler;Ursula Staubli;Howard Eichenbaum

  • Differential contributions of dorsal vs. ventral hippocampus to auditory trace fear conditioning

    Taejib Yoon;Tim Otto

  • Cognitive decline associated with normal aging in rats: a neuropsychological approach

    D R Zyzak;T Otto;H Eichenbaum;M Gallagher

  • Behavioral and neuropsychological foundations of olfactory fear conditioning.

    Timothy Otto;Graham Cousens;Christopher Herzog

  • Dorsal versus ventral hippocampal contributions to trace and contextual conditioning: differential effects of regionally selective NMDA receptor antagonism on acquisition and expression

    Jennifer Czerniawski;Fredrick Ree;Chester Chia;Timothy Otto

  • Dissociating space and trace in dorsal and ventral hippocampus.

    Jennifer Czerniawski;Taejib Yoon;Tim Otto

  • The Importance of Having Arc: Expression of the Immediate-Early Gene Arc Is Required for Hippocampus-Dependent Fear Conditioning and Blocked by NMDA Receptor Antagonism

    Jennifer Czerniawski;Fredrick Ree;Chester Chia;Kartik Ramamoorthi

  • Excitotoxic lesions of the hippocampus disrupt runway but not consummatory contrast.

    Charles F Flaherty;Cynthia Coppotelli;David Hsu;Timothy Otto

  • Analysis of aversively conditioned learning and memory in rats recovered from pyrithiamine-induced thiamine deficiency.

    Robert G. Mair;Timothy A. Otto;Russell L. Knoth;Sharon A. Rabchenuk

Frequent Co-Authors

Howard Eichenbaum
Howard Eichenbaum Boston University
Neal J. Cohen
Neal J. Cohen University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Gary Lynch
Gary Lynch University of California, Irvine
Ursula Staubli
Ursula Staubli New York University
Cynthia G. Wible
Cynthia G. Wible Harvard University
Rachael L. Neve
Rachael L. Neve Harvard University
Michela Gallagher
Michela Gallagher Johns Hopkins University
Larry R. Squire
Larry R. Squire University of California, San Diego
Charles F. Flaherty
Charles F. Flaherty Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Louis D. Matzel
Louis D. Matzel Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Tim Otto

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles