World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
38
Citations
7092
World Ranking
2313
National Ranking
30

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
37
Citations
7009
World Ranking
8290
National Ranking
162

Cornelis Roos publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cornelis Roos sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 82 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 108 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Cornelis Roos D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cornelis Roos sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 137 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

Cornelis Roos is affiliated with Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands. Their research spans several areas within mathematics and computer science, with a focus on optimization and combinatorial mathematics.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Mathematics
  • Computer Science

Within these fields, their work concentrates on various subfields such as:

  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Numerical Analysis
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Applied Mathematics

Cornelis Roos's research topics cover several advanced areas, including:

  • Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research
  • Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics
  • Risk and Portfolio Optimization
  • Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
  • Matrix Theory and Algorithms
  • Statistical and numerical algorithms
  • Mathematics and Applications

The scientist has contributed to scholarly literature with recent papers such as:

  • A Universal and Structured Way to Derive Dual Optimization Problem Formulations, 2020, INFORMS Journal on Optimization
  • Using Nemirovski's Mirror-Prox method as basic procedure in Chubanov's method for solving homogeneous feasibility problems, 2022, Optimization methods & software

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Cornelis Roos include:

  • Marleen Balvert
  • Bram L. Gorissen
  • Dick den Hertog
  • Yanqin Bai
  • Wei Zhang

In terms of publication venues, the researcher has published in:

  • INFORMS Journal on Optimization
  • Optimization methods & software

Best Publications

  • Theory and algorithms for linear optimization : an interior point approach

    C. Roos;T. Terlaky;J.-Ph. Vial

  • On implementing a primal-dual interior-point method for conic quadratic optimization

    Erling D. Andersen;Cornelis Roos;Tamás Terlaky

  • Self-Regularity: A New Paradigm for Primal-Dual Interior-Point Algorithms

    Jiming Peng;Cornelis Roos;Tamás Terlaky

  • A Comparative Study of Kernel Functions for Primal-Dual Interior-Point Algorithms in Linear Optimization

    Y. Q. Bai;M. El Ghami;C. Roos

  • Interior Point Methods for Linear Optimization

    Cornelis Roos;Tamás Terlaky;J. P Vial

  • Self-regular functions and new search directions for linear and semidefinite optimization

    Jiming Peng;Cornelis Roos;Tamás Terlaky

  • Robust Solutions of Uncertain Quadratic and Conic-Quadratic Problems

    A. Ben-Tal;A. Nemirovski;C. Roos

  • On Copositive Programming and Standard Quadratic Optimization Problems

    Immanuel M. Bomze;Mirjam Dür;Etienne De Klerk;Cornelis Roos

  • On maximization of quadratic form over intersection of ellipsoids with common center

    Arkadi Nemirovski;Cornelis Roos;Tamás Terlaky

  • Sensitivity analysis in linear programming: just be careful!

    B. Jansen;J.J. de Jong;C. Roos;T. Terlaky

  • A Full-Newton Step O ( n ) Infeasible Interior-Point Algorithm for Linear Optimization

    C. Roos

  • A New Efficient Large-Update Primal-Dual Interior-Point Method Based on a Finite Barrier

    Y. Q. Bai;M. El Ghami;C. Roos

  • A polynomial method of approximate centers for linear programming

    C. Roos;J.-Ph. Vial

  • On the Convergence of the Central Path in Semidefinite Optimization

    M. Halická;E. de Klerk;C. Roos

  • Cramer and Cayley-Hamilton in the max algebra

    G.J. Olsder;C. Roos

  • A new lower bound for the minimum distance of a cyclic code

    C. Roos

  • Initialization in semidefinite programming via a self-dual, skew-symmetric embedding

    E. de Klerk;C. Roos;T. Terlaky

  • A survey of search directions in interior point methods for linear programming

    D. den Hertog;C. Roos

  • Full Nesterov–Todd step infeasible interior-point method for symmetric optimization

    Guoyong Gu;Maryam Zangiabadi;Cornelis Roos

  • Copositive realxation for genera quadratic programming

    A.J. Quist;E. De klerk;C. Roos;T. Terlaky

Frequent Co-Authors

Tamás Terlaky
Tamás Terlaky Lehigh University
Dick den Hertog
Dick den Hertog University of Amsterdam
Arkadi Nemirovski
Arkadi Nemirovski Georgia Institute of Technology
Jean-Philippe Vial
Jean-Philippe Vial University of Geneva
Aharon Ben-Tal
Aharon Ben-Tal Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Immanuel M. Bomze
Immanuel M. Bomze University of Vienna

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Mathematics in the USA opens doors to diverse career paths and further educational opportunities, including various online programs designed for flexibility and accessibility. For those considering business-oriented roles, exploring options like what MBA programs can I get into can help identify programs with manageable admissions requirements.

If speed and convenience are priorities, many students benefit from researching the easiest and fastest online MBA programs, which can accelerate the transition into leadership positions without compromising learning quality.

For professionals seeking to advance their expertise further, affordable options like the most affordable online DBA programs provide doctoral-level education in business administration, ideal for those aiming at academic or executive careers.

Additionally, those interested in finance-related roles should consider the online masters in finance, which complements mathematical skills with financial acumen for various lucrative opportunities.

Exploring these related online degrees helps Mathematics graduates tailor their career pathways effectively while balancing affordability, speed, and program suitability.

Best Scientists Citing Cornelis Roos

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles