What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Mechanical engineering
- Statistics
- Composite material
His primary areas of investigation include Machining, Structural engineering, Coupling, Finite element method and Vibration.
He interconnects Frequency response, Image resolution, Stability and System dynamics in the investigation of issues within Machining.
His Frequency response research entails a greater understanding of Control theory.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Mechanics, Instability, End milling and Immersion.
His research integrates issues of Single degree of freedom, Substructure, Coincident, Point and Stiffness in his study of Coupling.
His work deals with themes such as Displacement, Tribology, Cutting force, Multibody system and Revolute joint, which intersect with Finite element method.
His most cited work include:
- Predicting High-Speed Machining Dynamics by Substructure Analysis (221 citations)
- Machining Dynamics: Frequency Response to Improved Productivity (196 citations)
- Tool Point Frequency Response Prediction for High-Speed Machining by RCSA (162 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Tony L. Schmitz spends much of his time researching Machining, Frequency response, Structural engineering, Stability and Mechanical engineering.
His studies in Machining integrate themes in fields like Engineering drawing and Chip.
His studies deal with areas such as Acoustics, Modal, Natural frequency, Point and Impact testing as well as Frequency response.
He combines subjects such as Coupling and Boundary value problem with his study of Structural engineering.
His Stability research integrates issues from Time domain, Control theory, Sampling, Bifurcation and Limit.
His Mechanical engineering research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Edge and System dynamics.
He most often published in these fields:
- Machining (25.67%)
- Frequency response (23.75%)
- Structural engineering (19.54%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2018-2021)?
- Time domain (14.18%)
- Frequency response (23.75%)
- Stability (19.54%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His main research concerns Time domain, Frequency response, Stability, Machining and Mechanical engineering.
His Frequency response research incorporates elements of Modal, Natural frequency, Structural engineering, Point and Impact testing.
His Point research includes themes of Acoustics, Coupling, Mode and Bending.
The Stability study combines topics in areas such as Geometry, Metric and Control theory.
His Control theory study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Vibration, Uncertainty analysis and Stability Model.
His Machining research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Stability and Reduction.
Between 2018 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- A neural network approach for chatter prediction in turning (11 citations)
- Machining Chatter Prediction Using a Data Learning Model (10 citations)
- Remaining useful tool life predictions in turning using Bayesian inference (8 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Mechanical engineering
- Statistics
- Electrical engineering
Tony L. Schmitz mainly focuses on Stability, Machining, Composite material, Frequency response and Time domain.
His work carried out in the field of Stability brings together such families of science as Geometry and Control theory.
His Machining research also works with subjects such as
- Stability together with Mechanical engineering,
- Reduced cost which intersects with area such as Material removal and Limit.
His Frequency response research incorporates themes from Structural engineering and Blank.
His Structural engineering study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Connection, Point and Coupling.
His Time domain research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Sampling, Displacement, Modeling and simulation, Chip and Oscillation.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
