World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
55
Citations
16832
World Ranking
4631
National Ranking
139

Niels D. Prins publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Niels D. Prins sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 213 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Niels D. Prins D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Niels D. Prins sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Niels D. Prins is affiliated with Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a notable concentration in psychiatry and mental health, neurology, and physiology. The scientist's work also extends into economics and econometrics, as well as pulmonary and respiratory medicine.

Their research addresses several key topics, including:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Meta-analysis and systematic reviews

Among their recent papers are:

  • "Serum markers glial fibrillary acidic protein and neurofilament light for prognosis and monitoring in cognitively normal older people: a prospective memory clinic-based cohort study" (2021) published in The Lancet Healthy Longevity
  • "ATN classification and clinical progression in subjective cognitive decline" (2020) published in Neurology
  • "Safety and Efficacy of Semorinemab in Individuals With Prodromal to Mild Alzheimer Disease" (2022) published in JAMA Neurology
  • "Diversity in Alzheimer's disease drug trials: The importance of eligibility criteria" (2021) published in Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • "A phase 2 double-blind placebo-controlled 24-week treatment clinical study of the p38 alpha kinase inhibitor neflamapimod in mild Alzheimer's disease" (2021) published in Alzheimer s Research & Therapy

Frequent collaborators include Wiesje M. van der Flier, Philip Scheltens, Frederik Barkhof, Charlotte E. Teunissen, and Sietske A.M. Sikkes.

They have published extensively in several venues, notably:

  • Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • Alzheimer s Research & Therapy
  • The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer s Disease
  • Alzheimer s & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring
  • Neurology

Best Publications

  • Silent brain infarcts and the risk of dementia and cognitive decline

    Sarah E Vermeer;Niels D Prins;Tom den Heijer;Albert Hofman

  • White matter hyperintensities, cognitive impairment and dementia: an update.

    Niels D. Prins;Philip Scheltens

  • Cerebral small-vessel disease and decline in information processing speed, executive function and memory

    Niels D. Prins;Ewoud J. van Dijk;Tom den Heijer;Sarah E. Vermeer

  • Diagnostic criteria for vascular cognitive disorders: a VASCOG statement.

    Perminder Sachdev;Raj Kalaria;John O'Brien;Ingmar Skoog

  • Progression of Cerebral Small Vessel Disease in Relation to Risk Factors and Cognitive Consequences. Rotterdam Scan Study

    Ewoud J. van Dijk;Niels D. Prins;Henri A. Vrooman;Albert Hofman

  • Cerebral white matter lesions and the risk of dementia.

    Niels D. Prins;Ewoud J. van Dijk;Tom den Heijer;Sarah E. Vermeer

  • Type 2 diabetes and atrophy of medial temporal lobe structures on brain MRI

    T. den Heijer;S. E. Vermeer;E. J. van Dijk;N. D. Prins

  • Progress toward standardized diagnosis of vascular cognitive impairment: Guidelines from the Vascular Impairment of Cognition Classification Consensus Study

    Olivia Skrobot;Sandra Black;Christopher Chen;Charles Decarli

  • C-Reactive Protein and Cerebral Small-Vessel Disease The Rotterdam Scan Study

    E. J. van Dijk;N. D. Prins;S. E. Vermeer;H. A. Vrooman

  • Homocysteine and cognitive function in the elderly: the Rotterdam Scan Study.

    N.D. Prins;T. den Heijer;A. Hofman;P.J. Koudstaal

  • Association between blood pressure, white matter lesions, and atrophy of the medial temporal lobe.

    T. den Heijer;L. J. Launer;N. D. Prins;E. J. van Dijk

  • Retinal vessel diameters and cerebral small vessel disease: the Rotterdam Scan Study.

    M. Kamran Ikram;Frank Jan De Jong;Ewoud J. Van Dijk;Niels D. Prins

  • Plasma Amyloid as Prescreener for the Earliest Alzheimer Pathological Changes

    Inge M. W. Verberk;Rosalinde E. Slot;Sander C. J. Verfaillie;Hans Heijst

  • The Vascular Impairment of Cognition Classification Consensus Study

    Olivia A. Skrobot;John T. O'brien;Sandra E. Black;Christopher Chen

  • Operational Definitions for the NINDS-AIREN Criteria for Vascular Dementia. An Interobserver Study

    Elisabeth C.W. Van Straaten;Philip Scheltens;Dirk L. Knol;Mark A. Van Buchem

  • Impact of molecular imaging on the diagnostic process in a memory clinic

    Rik Ossenkoppele;Niels D. Prins;Yolande A.L. Pijnenburg;Afina W. Lemstra

  • Measuring progression of cerebral white matter lesions on MRI Visual rating and volumetrics

    N. D. Prins;E. C.W. van Straaten;E. J. van Dijk;M. Simoni

  • Serum markers glial fibrillary acidic protein and neurofilament light for prognosis and monitoring in cognitively normal older people: a prospective memory clinic-based cohort study

    Inge M W Verberk;Malika B Laarhuis;Karlijn A van den Bosch;Jarith L Ebenau

  • ATN classification and clinical progression in subjective cognitive decline : The SCIENCe project

    Jarith L. Ebenau;Tessa Timmers;Linda M.P. Wesselman;Inge M.W. Verberk

  • Plasma amyloid beta, apolipoprotein E, lacunar infarcts, and white matter lesions.

    Ewoud J. Van Dijk;Niels D. Prins;Sarah E. Vermeer;Albert Hofman

  • Trajectories of cognitive decline in different types of dementia

    L. L. Smits;A. C. van Harten;Y. A. L. Pijnenburg;E. L. G. E. Koedam

Frequent Co-Authors

Philip Scheltens
Philip Scheltens Amsterdam UMC
Wiesje M. van der Flier
Wiesje M. van der Flier Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Frederik Barkhof
Frederik Barkhof University College London
Peter J. Koudstaal
Peter J. Koudstaal Erasmus University Rotterdam
Rik Ossenkoppele
Rik Ossenkoppele Lund University
Monique M.B. Breteler
Monique M.B. Breteler German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases
Geert Jan Biessels
Geert Jan Biessels Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Neuroscience opens doors to diverse fields, and many students are interested in flexible learning options. Choosing the best majors in college can set you up for lucrative and fulfilling careers, especially in STEM fields like neuroscience, psychology, and biomedical sciences.

For those seeking affordability and convenience, consider enrolling in one of the best online colleges that accept fafsa. These institutions offer accessible degree programs and financial aid, removing barriers to quality education.

If you’re looking for swift entry into the workforce or to complement your neuroscience studies, look into short certificate programs that pay well. Certificates in data analysis, healthcare administration, or lab technology are great ways to build in-demand skills rapidly.

Not all academic paths are equally rigorous. Some students prefer to balance challenge with manageability, and options among the easy online degrees can be a smart way to earn credentials while leaving time for research or other interests.

Best Scientists Citing Niels D. Prins

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles