World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Kristen M. Shockley

Kristen M. Shockley

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 32 10720 10036 5604 5116 69 9527

Kristen M. Shockley publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kristen M. Shockley between 2007 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kristen M. Shockley published across 19 years, from 2007 to 2025, averaging 4.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2021. 10 of the 87 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2021. 2007: 1 publication 2008: 3 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 5 publications
2007 2025

87 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kristen M. Shockley: publications per year, 2007 to 2025
Year Publications
2007 1
2008 3
2009 2
2010 3
2011 3
2012 4
2013 4
2014 4
2015 6
2016 5
2017 7
2018 8
2019 4
2020 6
2021 10
2022 4
2023 3
2024 5
2025 5
Total 87
Download as CSV

Kristen M. Shockley publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kristen M. Shockley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 61–70 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 69 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299 69
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Kristen M. Shockley D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kristen M. Shockley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 32
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Kristen M. Shockley is affiliated with the University of Georgia in the United States. Their research spans several fields including social sciences, psychology, and business, management, and accounting. Within these domains, their work particularly focuses on subfields such as sociology and political science, organizational behavior and human resource management, general health professions, gender studies, and social psychology.

The main topics addressed in Shockley's publications center on work-family balance challenges, job satisfaction and organizational behavior, gender diversity and inequality, employment and welfare studies, digital mental health interventions, workplace health and well-being, and behavioral health and interventions.

Recent scholarly contributions include:

  • Pandemics: Implications for research and practice in industrial and organizational psychology (2021), published in Industrial and Organizational Psychology
  • Work-family strategies during COVID-19: Examining gender dynamics among dual-earner couples with young children (2020), published in Journal of Applied Psychology
  • The fatiguing effects of camera use in virtual meetings: A within-person field experiment (2021), published in Journal of Applied Psychology
  • Remote worker communication during COVID-19: The role of quantity, quality, and supervisor expectation-setting (2021), published in Journal of Applied Psychology
  • Formal and Informal Supports for Managing Work and Family (2020), published in Current Directions in Psychological Science

Shockley's frequent collaborators include Allison S. Gabriel, Hope Dodd, Nitya Chawla, Christopher C. Rosen, and Joanna Tochman Campbell. These coauthors have repeatedly contributed to various research projects, reflecting ongoing partnerships in their scholarly work.

Their publications are most commonly found in several academic journals and proceedings, with notable frequency in:

  • Journal of Applied Psychology
  • Industrial and Organizational Psychology
  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Journal of Career Development
  • Journal of Vocational Behavior

Shockley has also contributed to book publications, including a volume titled Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management published in 2022, which has been cited in related academic literature.

Best Publications

  • How Effective Is Telecommuting? Assessing the Status of Our Scientific Findings

    Tammy D. Allen;Timothy D. Golden;Kristen M. Shockley

  • Work–Family Conflict and Flexible Work Arrangements: Deconstructing Flexibility

    Tammy D. Allen;Ryan C. Johnson;Kaitlin M. Kiburz;Kristen M. Shockley

  • When flexibility helps: Another look at the availability of flexible work arrangements and work–family conflict

    Kristen M. Shockley;Tammy D. Allen

  • A meta-analysis of work-family conflict and social support.

    Kimberly A. French;Soner Dumani;Tammy D. Allen;Kristen M. Shockley

  • Reconsidering Work—Family Interactions and Satisfaction: A Meta-Analysis

    Kristen M. Shockley;Neha Singla

  • Development of a new scale to measure subjective career success: A mixed-methods study

    Kristen M. Shockley;Heather Ureksoy;Ozgun Burcu Rodopman;Laura F. Poteat

  • Disentangling the relationship between gender and work-family conflict: An integration of theoretical perspectives using meta-analytic methods.

    Kristen M. Shockley;Winny Shen;Michael M. DeNunzio;Maryana L. Arvan

  • The fatiguing effects of camera use in virtual meetings: A within-person field experiment.

    Kristen M. Shockley;Allison S. Gabriel;Daron Robertson;Christopher C. Rosen

  • Meta-analysis of work–family conflict mean differences: Does national context matter?

    Tammy D. Allen;Kimberly A. French;Soner Dumani;Kristen M. Shockley

  • Investigating the missing link in flexible work arrangement utilization: An individual difference perspective

    Kristen M. Shockley;Tammy D. Allen

  • A Meta-Analytic Investigation of the Relationship Between State Affect, Discrete Emotions, and Job Performance

    Kristen M. Shockley;Dan Ispas;Michael E. Rossi;Edward L. Levine

  • Motives for flexible work arrangement use.

    Kristen M. Shockley;Tammy D. Allen

  • Achieving Work-Family Balance: An Action Regulation Model

    Andreas Hirschi;Kristen M. Shockley;Hannes Zacher

  • Episodic work-family conflict, cardiovascular indicators, and social support: an experience sampling approach.

    Kristen M. Shockley;Tammy D. Allen

  • Mentor-Protégé Commitment Fit and Relationship Satisfaction in Academic Mentoring

    Laura F. Poteat;Kristen M. Shockley;Tammy D. Allen

  • Deciding Between Work and Family: An Episodic Approach

    Kristen M. Shockley;Tammy D. Allen

  • Remote worker communication during COVID-19: The role of quantity, quality, and supervisor expectation-setting.

    Kristen M Shockley;Tammy D Allen;Hope Dodd;Aashna M Waiwood

  • Reconsidering work-family interactions and satisfaction: A meta-analysis: (518422013-318)

    Kristen M. Shockley;Neha Singla

Frequent Co-Authors

Tammy D. Allen
Tammy D. Allen University of South Florida
Hannes Zacher
Hannes Zacher Leipzig University
Andreas Hirschi
Andreas Hirschi University of Bern
Eden B. King
Eden B. King Rice University
Frederick L. Oswald
Frederick L. Oswald Rice University
Guido Hertel
Guido Hertel University of Münster
Craig J. Bryan
Craig J. Bryan The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
Lillian T. Eby
Lillian T. Eby University of Georgia
Russell E. Johnson
Russell E. Johnson Michigan State University
Talya N. Bauer
Talya N. Bauer Portland State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens up a range of online degrees and career opportunities, especially within educational and counseling fields. Prospective students often consider careers such as school counselor, where state-specific licensure and education requirements play a crucial role.

Each US state sets its own certification standards. For those interested in working in the Midwest, it’s essential to understand the Michigan school counselor education requirements or the requirements to be a school counselor in Minnesota. Similarly, if you’re considering opportunities farther south, review the requirements to be a school counselor in Mississippi. In the central US, you’ll need to understand the Missouri school counselor certification requirements.

Many universities offer flexible online psychology degrees, making it easier to meet these state-specific requirements. It’s important to carefully research the academic path necessary in your intended state to ensure your degree aligns with local certification standards and accelerates your career journey.

Best Scientists Citing Kristen M. Shockley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles