World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
9900
World Ranking
7768
National Ranking
4170

Eric L. Daleiden publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric L. Daleiden sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 98 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Eric L. Daleiden D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric L. Daleiden sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Eric L. Daleiden is affiliated with the University of South Carolina in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Health Professions, with specific focus in Clinical Psychology and General Health Professions. Other areas of study include Applied Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, and Social Psychology.

Their work addresses several main research topics, including Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development, Health Policy Implementation Science, Family and Disability Support Research, Digital Mental Health Interventions, Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics, Child Welfare and Adoption, and Autism Spectrum Disorder Research.

Eric L. Daleiden has published in multiple venues, with frequent appearances in the following journals:

  • Contemporary Family Therapy
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy
  • Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
  • Implementation Research and Practice
  • Global Health Action

Recent publications include:

  • "Design process and protocol description for a multi-problem mental health intervention within a stepped care approach for adolescents in India" (2020) in Behaviour Research and Therapy
  • "Using relevance mapping methodology to design an adolescent mental health intervention in India" (2020) in Global Health Action
  • "Creating a prepared mental health workforce: comparative illustrations of implementation strategies" (2020) in Evidence-Based Mental Health
  • "Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale: a Psychometric Examination in Chinese Youth" (2021) in Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
  • "Fifteen years of MAP implementation in Minnesota: Tailoring training to evolving provider experience and expertise" (2020) in Journal of Family Social Work

Frequent collaborators include Bruce F. Chorpita, with whom Daleiden has shared multiple publications. Other recurring coauthors are Molly Bobek, Aaron Hogue, Nicole Porter, and Charmaine K. Higa-McMillan.

Best Publications

  • Testing Standard and Modular Designs for Psychotherapy Treating Depression, Anxiety, and Conduct Problems in Youth: A Randomized Effectiveness Trial

    John R Weisz;Bruce F. Chorpita;Lawrence A. Palinkas;Sonia K. Schoenwald

  • Identifying and selecting the common elements of evidence based interventions: a distillation and matching model.

    Bruce F. Chorpita;Eric L. Daleiden;John R. Weisz

  • Mapping evidence-based treatments for children and adolescents: application of the distillation and matching model to 615 treatments from 322 randomized trials.

    Bruce F. Chorpita;Eric L. Daleiden

  • Evidence-Based Treatments for Children and Adolescents: An Updated Review of Indicators of Efficacy and Effectiveness

    Bruce F. Chorpita;Eric L. Daleiden;Chad Ebesutani;John Young

  • Modularity in the design and application of therapeutic interventions

    Bruce F. Chorpita;Eric L. Daleiden;John R. Weisz

  • Biased attention in childhood anxiety disorders : a preliminary study

    Michael W. Vasey;Eric L. Daleiden;Laura L. Williams;Lisa M. Brown

  • Understanding the common elements of evidence-based practice: misconceptions and clinical examples.

    Bruce F. Chorpita;Kimberly D. Becker;Eric L. Daleiden

  • Anxiety and the Processing of Emotionally Threatening Stimuli: Distinctive Patterns of Selective Attention among High‐ and Low‐Test‐Anxious Children

    Michael W. Vasey;Nagat El-Hag;Eric L. Daleiden

  • An information-processing perspective on childhood anxiety.

    Eric L. Daleiden;Michael W. Vasey

  • Long-term outcomes for the Child STEPs randomized effectiveness trial: a comparison of modular and standard treatment designs with usual care.

    Bruce F. Chorpita;John R. Weisz;Eric L. Daleiden;Sonja K. Schoenwald

  • The common elements of engagement in children's mental health services: which elements for which outcomes?

    Kimberly D. Becker;Bethany R. Lee;Eric L. Daleiden;Michael Lindsey

  • The relationship among cognitive schemas, job-related traumatic exposure, and posttraumatic stress disorder in journalists.

    Caroline M. Pyevich;Elana Newman;Eric Daleiden

  • Identifying the Common Elements of Treatment Engagement Interventions in Children’s Mental Health Services

    Michael A. Lindsey;Michael A. Lindsey;Nicole E. Brandt;Kimberly D. Becker;Bethany R. Lee

  • Subgroup Differences in the Modus Operandi of Adolescent Sexual Offenders

    Keith L. Kaufman;Daniel R. Hilliker;Eric L. Daleiden

  • Tripartite dimensions of emotion in a child clinical sample: measurement strategies and implications for clinical utility.

    Bruce F. Chorpita;Eric L. Daleiden

  • Child STEPs in California: A cluster randomized effectiveness trial comparing modular treatment with community implemented treatment for youth with anxiety, depression, conduct problems, or traumatic stress.

    Bruce F Chorpita;Eric L Daleiden;Alayna L Park;Alyssa M Ward

  • Driving with roadmaps and dashboards: using information resources to structure the decision models in service organizations.

    Bruce F. Chorpita;Adam Bernstein;Eric L. Daleiden

  • Dissemination and Implementation of Evidence Based Treatments for Youth: Challenges and Recommendations

    Michael A. Southam-Gerow;Bruce F. Chorpita;Eric L. Daleiden

  • From Data to Wisdom: Quality Improvement Strategies Supporting Large-scale Implementation of Evidence-Based Services

    Eric L. Daleiden;Bruce F. Chorpita

  • Empirically Guided Coordination of Multiple Evidence-Based Treatments: An Illustration of Relevance Mapping in Children's Mental Health Services.

    Bruce F. Chorpita;Adam Bernstein;Eric L. Daleiden

  • Factors Influencing Sexual Offenders' Modus Operandi: An Examination of Victim-Offender Relatedness and Age

    Keith L. Kaufman;Jennifer K. Holmberg;Karen A. Orts;Fara E. McCrady

Frequent Co-Authors

Bruce F. Chorpita
Bruce F. Chorpita University of California, Los Angeles
Kimberly D. Becker
Kimberly D. Becker University of South Carolina
John R. Weisz
John R. Weisz Harvard University
Michael A. Southam-Gerow
Michael A. Southam-Gerow Virginia Commonwealth University
Michael W. Vasey
Michael W. Vasey The Ohio State University
Jason Schiffman
Jason Schiffman University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Mary Jane Rotheram-Borus
Mary Jane Rotheram-Borus University of California, Los Angeles
Jennifer L. Krull
Jennifer L. Krull University of California, Los Angeles
Jeanne Miranda
Jeanne Miranda University of California, Los Angeles
Lawrence A. Palinkas
Lawrence A. Palinkas University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As psychology continues to evolve, students now have more choices than ever for online and hybrid degree options across the United States. Selecting the right program is essential for aligning your studies with your career goals. Whether you aim for clinical practice, research, or roles in business and education, accredited online programs provide flexible pathways to success.

Rankings can help you compare quality and specialization across locations. For those considering Texas, you might look at the best psychology degree rankings in Arlington and the best psychology degree programs ranking in Austin to find respected programs. California remains a leading hub for the field, with many top psychology programs in California offering diverse online and in-person options. Those in the Southeast can explore the top psychology programs in Charleston, which also offer online degree opportunities.

Online psychology degrees can lead to careers in mental health counseling, therapy, education, HR, and beyond. As the landscape continues to adapt, students benefit from flexible study formats while still accessing high-quality faculty and resources.

Best Scientists Citing Eric L. Daleiden

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles