World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 63 3148 2900 337 319 182 12970

I. C. McManus publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by I. C. McManus between 1976 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. I. C. McManus published across 50 years, from 1976 to 2025, averaging 5.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2022. 11 of the 264 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2022. 1976: 1 publication 1977: 2 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 2 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 2 publications 1982: 6 publications 1983: 7 publications 1984: 7 publications 1985: 6 publications 1986: 6 publications 1987: 7 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 7 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 11 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 11 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 18 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 4 publications
1976 2025

264 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
I. C. McManus: publications per year, 1976 to 2025
Year Publications
1976 1
1977 2
1978 1
1979 2
1980 1
1981 2
1982 6
1983 7
1984 7
1985 6
1986 6
1987 7
1988 4
1989 7
1990 2
1991 3
1992 6
1993 11
1994 4
1995 8
1996 3
1997 3
1998 11
1999 4
2000 2
2001 5
2002 8
2003 5
2004 4
2005 8
2006 5
2007 3
2008 7
2009 3
2010 5
2011 6
2012 4
2013 9
2014 4
2015 6
2016 4
2017 3
2018 7
2019 2
2020 6
2021 10
2022 18
2023 5
2024 7
2025 4
Total 264
Download as CSV

I. C. McManus publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where I. C. McManus sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–190 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 182 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397 182
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

I. C. McManus D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where I. C. McManus sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62–63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248 63
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

I. C. McManus is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a particular focus on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Health, Oncology, and Clinical Psychology.

The scientist's work covers key topics including Medical Education and Admissions, Innovations in Medical Education, COVID-19 and healthcare impacts, Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy, COVID-19 epidemiological studies, Diversity and Career in Medicine, and COVID-19 and Mental Health.

McManus has contributed to several recent papers, notably:

  • Exploring UK medical school differences: the MedDifs study of selection, teaching, student and F1 perceptions, postgraduate outcomes and fitness to practise, 2020, BMC Medicine
  • Ethnic differences in SARS-CoV-2 vaccine hesitancy in United Kingdom healthcare workers: Results from the UK-REACH prospective nationwide cohort study, 2021, The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
  • The United Kingdom Research study into Ethnicity And COVID-19 outcomes in Healthcare workers (UK-REACH): protocol for a prospective longitudinal cohort study of healthcare and ancillary workers in UK healthcare settings, 2021, BMJ Open
  • Risk factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection in a multiethnic cohort of United Kingdom healthcare workers (UK-REACH): A cross-sectional analysis, 2022, PLoS Medicine
  • Healthcare workers' views on mandatory SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in the UK: A cross-sectional, mixed-methods analysis from the UK-REACH study, 2022, EClinicalMedicine

Collaboration has been an important aspect of McManus's research, with frequent co-authors including Katherine Woolf, Laura B Nellums, Anna L. Guyatt, Amit Gupta, and Martin D. Tobin.

The scientist's work has been published repeatedly in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), BMJ Open, BMC Medicine, Laterality Asymmetries of Body Brain and Cognition, and The Lancet Regional Health - Europe.

Best Publications

  • Stress, burnout and doctors' attitudes to work are determined by personality and learning style: a twelve year longitudinal study of UK medical graduates.

    IC McManus;A. A. Keeling;E Paice

  • Effect of sleep deprivation on surgeons' dexterity on laparoscopy simulator

    NJ Taffinder;IC McManus;Y Gul;Rcg Russell

  • The causal links between stress and burnout in a longitudinal study of UK doctors

    IC McManus;BC Winder;D Gordon

  • Cross-comparison of MRCGP & MRCP(UK) in a database linkage study of 2,284 candidates taking both examinations: assessment of validity and differential performance by ethnicity

    Richard Wakeford;MeiLing Denney;Katarzyna Ludka-Stempien;Jane Dacre

  • Validation of virtual reality to teach and assess psychomotor skills in laparoscopic surgery: results from randomised controlled studies using the MIST VR laparoscopic simulator.

    N Taffinder;C Sutton;R J Fishwick;I C McManus

  • Meta-analysis of corpus callosum size in schizophrenia.

    P. W. R. Woodruff;I. C. Mcmanus;A. S. David

  • A levels and intelligence as predictors of medical careers in UK doctors: 20 year prospective study

    I C McManus;Eleni Smithers;Philippa Partridge;A Keeling

  • Clinical experience, performance in final examinations, and learning style in medical students: prospective study.

    I C McManus;P Richards;B C Winder;K A Sproston

  • Pilot study of the roles of personality, references, and personal statements in relation to performance over the five years of a medical degree

    Eamonn Ferguson;David James;Fiona O'Hehir;Andrea Sanders

  • Evaluating the empirical support for the Geschwind-Behan-Galaburda model of cerebral lateralization.

    M.P. Bryden;I.C. Mcmanus;M.B. Bulmanfleming

  • The development of handedness in children

    I. C. McManus;G. Sik;D. R. Cole;A. F. Mellon

  • The genetics of handedness, cerebral dominance, and lateralization.

    I. C. McManus;M. P. Bryden

  • Aesthetic activities and aesthetic attitudes: Influences of education, background and personality on interest and involvement in the arts

    I. C. McManus;A. Furnham

  • Assessment of examiner leniency and stringency ('hawk-dove effect') in the MRCP(UK) clinical examination (PACES) using multi-facet Rasch modelling

    IC McManus;M Thompson;J Mollon

  • The shortened Study Process Questionnaire: an investigation of its structure and longitudinal stability using confirmatory factor analysis.

    Robin A. Fox;I.C. McManus;Belinda C. Winder

  • Intellectual aptitude tests and A levels for selecting UK school leaver entrants for medical school

    I C McManus;David A Powis;Richard Wakeford;Eamonn Ferguson

  • Is insight important? measuring capacity to change performance.

    R B Hays;B C Jolly;L J M Caldon;P McCrorie

  • Intercalated degrees, learning styles, and career preferences: prospective longitudinal study of UK medical students

    I C McManus;P Richards;B C Winder

  • The Aesthetics of Colour

    Unknown

  • Ethnic differences in SARS-CoV-2 vaccine hesitancy in United Kingdom healthcare workers: Results from the UK-REACH prospective nationwide cohort study.

    Katherine Woolf;I Chris McManus;Christopher A Martin;Christopher A Martin;Laura B Nellums

  • Stressful incidents, stress and coping strategies in the pre-registration house officer year

    Elisabeth Paice;Harry Rutter;Mike Wetherell;Belinda Winder

  • The attractions of medicine: the generic motivations of medical school applicants in relation to demography, personality and achievement

    I.C. McManus;Gill Livingston;Cornelius Katona

Frequent Co-Authors

Eamonn Ferguson
Eamonn Ferguson University of Nottingham
Frances Rice
Frances Rice Cardiff University
Lucy Riglin
Lucy Riglin Cardiff University
Katherine Helen Shelton
Katherine Helen Shelton Cardiff University
Norah Frederickson
Norah Frederickson University College London
M.P. Bryden
M.P. Bryden University of Waterloo
Sally Maitlis
Sally Maitlis University of Oxford
Adrian Furnham
Adrian Furnham BI Norwegian Business School
Ara Darzi
Ara Darzi Imperial College London
Martin D. Tobin
Martin D. Tobin University of Leicester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to a variety of online degree options and rewarding career pathways. Many students consider careers in social work, counseling, or mental health services, blending their psychology background with professional roles that help individuals and communities.

Requirements for becoming a social worker vary by state and can impact your career planning. For instance, the Minnesota minimum degree requirement for social workers sets specific educational standards, often asking for at least a bachelor’s in social work or a related field. Similarly, understanding the social worker degree requirements in Mississippi is crucial before applying to jobs there.

Equally, aspiring professionals should review the Missouri minimum degree requirement for social workers and the degree needed to be a social worker in Montana to ensure they meet the proper credentials for licensure and practice in those states.

Exploring online degrees can provide flexibility for working professionals and those balancing personal commitments. Whether you plan to become a licensed social worker or pursue another psychology-related path, checking specific state requirements is an essential early step.

Best Scientists Citing I. C. McManus

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles