World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
61
Citations
17515
World Ranking
3340
National Ranking
212

M.P. Bryden publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M.P. Bryden sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 151 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

M.P. Bryden D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M.P. Bryden sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

M.P. Bryden was affiliated with the University of Waterloo in Canada. Their research primarily focused on diverse aspects of medicine and psychology, with particular attention to public health, environmental and occupational health, applied psychology, clinical psychology, biomedical engineering, and health informatics.

The scientific contributions of Bryden included work on topics such as telemedicine and telehealth implementation, digital mental health interventions, COVID-19 and mental health, anatomy and medical technology, artificial intelligence in healthcare and education, surgical simulation and training, and innovations in medical education.

Among Bryden's recent published papers were the following:

  • "From Pandemic to Progression: An Educational Framework for the Implementation of Virtual Mental Healthcare for Children and Youth as a Response to COVID-19" (2020, Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy)
  • "Diagnostic Imaging and Mechanical Objectivity in Medicine" (2021, Academic Radiology)
  • "University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine" (2020, Academic Medicine)

Frequent collaborators included Bridget T. Doan, Yue Yang, Erin Romanchych, Seena Grewal, and Suneeta Monga. Their joint efforts contributed to the multidisciplinary nature of Bryden's research outputs.

Publications appeared in multiple venues, reflecting the interdisciplinary scope of the work. Key publication venues included:

  • Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy
  • Academic Radiology
  • Academic Medicine

M.P. Bryden's scientific work integrated methods and knowledge from medicine and psychology, exploring the interface of technology and healthcare delivery. Their research addressed practical implementation challenges in telehealth and digital interventions, as well as innovation in medical education and technology.

Best Publications

  • Laterality: Functional Asymmetry in the Intact Brain

    M. P. Bryden

  • Measuring handedness with questionnaires.

    M.P. Bryden

  • Footedness is a better predictor than is handedness of emotional lateralization

    Lorin J. Elias;M.P. Bryden;M.B. Bulman-Fleming

  • Hemispheric differences in processing emotions and faces

    Robert G. Ley;M.P. Bryden

  • Different dimensions of hand preference that relate to skilled and unskilled activities.

    Runa E. Steenhuis;M. P. Bryden

  • Tachistoscopic recognition, handedness, and cerebral dominance☆

    M.P. Bryden

  • Handedness and sex differences in hemispheric asymmetry

    Deborah A. Lake;M.P. Bryden

  • Patterns of cerebral organization.

    M.P. Bryden;H. Hécaen;Maria DeAgostini

  • Familial handedness and left-right differences in auditory and visual perception

    E.B. Zurif;E.B. Zurif;M.P. Bryden;M.P. Bryden

  • Attentional biases and the right-ear effect in dichotic listening

    M.P Bryden;Kevin Munhall;F Allard

  • Evaluating the empirical support for the Geschwind-Behan-Galaburda model of cerebral lateralization.

    M.P. Bryden;I.C. Mcmanus;M.B. Bulmanfleming

  • Visual hemifield differences depend on typeface.

    M.P. Bryden;F. Allard

  • Statistical determination of degree of laterality.

    M.P. Bryden;D.A. Sprott

  • A group test for the assessment of performance between the hands

    S.M. Tapley;M.P. Bryden

  • A dissociation of right and left hemispheric effects for recognizing emotional tone and verbal content.

    Robert G Ley;Robert G Ley;M.P Bryden

  • The genetics of handedness, cerebral dominance, and lateralization.

    I. C. McManus;M. P. Bryden

  • Relations between prenatal testosterone and cerebral lateralization in children.

    Gina M. Grimshaw;M. Philip Bryden;Jo-Anne K. Finegan

  • First-Language Acquisition in Adolescence: Evidence for a Critical Period for Verbal Language Development

    Gina M Grimshaw;Ana Adelstein;M.Philip Bryden;G.E MacKinnon

  • Laterality effects in dichotic listening: Relations with handedness and reading ability in children

    Unknown

  • A left-ear advantage for identifying the emotional quality of tonal sequences.

    M.P. Bryden;Robert G. Ley;J.H. Sugarman

  • Individual Differences in Hemispheric Representation of Language

    Sidney J. Segalowitz;M.P. Bryden

Frequent Co-Authors

I. C. McManus
I. C. McManus University College London
Alfredo Ardila
Alfredo Ardila Sechenov University
Monica Rosselli
Monica Rosselli Florida Atlantic University
Geoffrey Underwood
Geoffrey Underwood University of Nottingham
Maryse Lassonde
Maryse Lassonde University of Montreal
Kenneth Hugdahl
Kenneth Hugdahl University of Bergen
Kevin G. Munhall
Kevin G. Munhall Queen's University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree opens up a range of online learning options and career pathways, especially in the growing field of counseling. Many universities now offer flexible online programs designed for both aspiring counselors and professionals looking to advance their skills.

When considering your path, it is important to select programs that offer strong career outcomes and value. For instance, take a look at the most valuable counseling degrees in Missouri and the most valuable counseling degrees in Pennsylvania to compare options by region. If you’re interested in urban study environments, explore the most valuable counseling degree programs ranking in Philadelphia.

For those on the West Coast, the best value counseling programs in Seattle provide another snapshot of top online and on-campus offerings. Choosing an accredited, highly-ranked online program can help you gain the skills needed for roles in clinical counseling, school psychology, and social work—opening doors to a rewarding future in mental health services.

Best Scientists Citing M.P. Bryden

Recently Published Articles