World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Alfredo Ardila

Alfredo Ardila

Award Badge
Neuroscience
Russia
2022

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 74 1882 1 351 20942
Neuroscience 74 2098 2 357 20735

Alfredo Ardila publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Alfredo Ardila between 1969 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Alfredo Ardila published across 56 years, from 1969 to 2024, averaging 6.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2020. 2 of the 372 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1969 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2020. 1969: 1 publication 1970: 0 publications 1971: 1 publication 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 2 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 3 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 7 publications 1988: 9 publications 1989: 14 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 10 publications 1994: 13 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 11 publications 1999: 20 publications 2000: 20 publications 2001: 12 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 16 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 28 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 1 publication 2024: 1 publication
1969 2024

372 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Alfredo Ardila: publications per year, 1969 to 2024
Year Publications
1969 1
1970 0
1971 1
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 2
1978 1
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 1
1984 3
1985 3
1986 5
1987 7
1988 9
1989 14
1990 6
1991 6
1992 6
1993 10
1994 13
1995 3
1996 6
1997 8
1998 11
1999 20
2000 20
2001 12
2002 6
2003 5
2004 4
2005 3
2006 5
2007 16
2008 7
2009 8
2010 9
2011 8
2012 4
2013 5
2014 10
2015 8
2016 14
2017 18
2018 14
2019 17
2020 28
2021 12
2022 1
2023 1
2024 1
Total 372
Download as CSV

Alfredo Ardila publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alfredo Ardila sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 351–360 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 351 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69 351
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Alfredo Ardila D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alfredo Ardila sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 74–75 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169 74
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2022 - Research.com Neuroscience in Russia Leader Award

Overview

Alfredo Ardila was affiliated with Sechenov University in the Russian Federation. Their research spanned multiple fields, focusing particularly on psychology, neuroscience, and medicine. Within these broad areas, their primary subfields included cognitive neuroscience, developmental and educational psychology, epidemiology, clinical psychology, and linguistics and language.

The main topics covered in their work involved neurobiology of language and bilingualism, reading and literacy development, language development and disorders, cerebrovascular and carotid artery diseases, COVID-19 and mental health, spatial neglect and hemispheric dysfunction, and acute ischemic stroke management.

Alfredo Ardila produced a number of scientific papers, including the following notable publications:

  • "Executive dysfunction in COVID-19 patients," 2020, published in Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome Clinical Research & Reviews
  • "Gerstmann Syndrome," 2020, published in Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports
  • "Who Are the Spanish Speakers? An Examination of Their Linguistic, Cultural, and Societal Commonalities and Differences," 2020, published in Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences
  • "Grammar in the brain: Two grammar subsystems and two agrammatic types of aphasia," 2021, published in Journal of Neurolinguistics

Their work on COVID-19-related neurological effects appeared alongside other researchers such as Durjoy Lahiri.

Frequent coauthors with whom Alfredo Ardila collaborated included:

  • Durjoy Lahiri
  • Souvik Dubey
  • Biman Kanti Ray
  • Macarena Rojas
  • Denise Carballea

Key publication venues where they contributed were:

  • Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
  • Journal of Neurolinguistics
  • Aphasiology
  • RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Best Publications

  • Age-Related Cognitive Decline During Normal Aging: The Complex Effect of Education

    Alfredo Ardila;Feggy Ostrosky-Solis;Mónica Rosselli;César Gómez

  • The impact of culture and education on non-verbal neuropsychological measurements: A critical review

    Mónica Rosselli;Alfredo Ardila

  • Aphasia : a clinical perspective

    D. Frank Benson;Alfredo Ardila

  • The Influence of the Parents' Educational Level on the Development of Executive Functions

    Alfredo Ardila;Monica Rosselli;Esmeralda Matute;Soledad Guajardo

  • On the evolutionary origins of executive functions.

    Alfredo Ardila

  • Correlation Between Intelligence Test Scores and Executive Function Measures

    Alfredo Ardila;David Pineda;Mónica Rosselli

  • Neuropsychological assessment in illiterates: visuospatial and memory abilities.

    Alfredo Ardila;Monica Rosselli;Patricia Rosas

  • NEUROPSI: a brief neuropsychological test battery in Spanish with norms by age and educational level.

    Feggy Ostrosky-Solís;Alfredo Ardila;Mónica Rosselli

  • Illiteracy: the neuropsychology of cognition without reading.

    Alfredo Ardila;Paulo H Bertolucci;Lucia W Braga;Alexander Castro-Caldas

  • Directions of research in cross-cultural neuropsychology

    Alfredo Ardila

  • Neuropsychological Evaluation of the Spanish Speaker

    Alfredo Ardila;Mónica Rosselli;Antonio E. Puente

  • Neuropsicología del desarrollo infantil

    Alfredo Ardila;Mónica Rosselli;Esmeralda Matute

  • Verbal Fluency and Repetition Skills in Healthy Older Spanish-English Bilinguals

    Mónica Rosselli;Alfredo Ardila;Katia Araujo;Viviana A. Weekes

  • Cultural Values Underlying Psychometric Cognitive Testing

    Alfredo Ardila

  • The role of the arcuate fasciculus in conduction aphasia

    Byron Bernal;Alfredo Ardila

  • Neuropsychological test performance in illiterate subjects.

    Feggy Ostrosky-Solis;Alfredo Ardila;Mónica Rosselli;Gabriela Lopez-Arango

  • Prevalence of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Symptoms in 4- to 17-Year-Old Children in the General Population

    David Pineda;Alfredo Ardila;Monica Rosselli;Beatriz E. Arias

  • Neuropsychological Deficits in Chronic Cocaine Abusers

    Alfredo Ardila;Monica Rosselli;Steven Strumwasser

  • How Localized are Language Brain Areas? A Review of Brodmann Areas Involvement in Oral Language

    Alfredo Ardila;Byron Bernal;Monica Rosselli

  • Desarrollo Histórico de las Funciones Ejecutivas

    Alfredo Ardila Ardila;Feggy Ostrosky Solís

Frequent Co-Authors

Monica Rosselli
Monica Rosselli Florida Atlantic University
Francisco Lopera
Francisco Lopera University of Antioquia
Alison Goate
Alison Goate Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Juan Carlos Arango-Lasprilla
Juan Carlos Arango-Lasprilla BioCruces Health research Institute
David A. Loewenstein
David A. Loewenstein University of Miami
M.P. Bryden
M.P. Bryden University of Waterloo
Mauricio Arcos-Burgos
Mauricio Arcos-Burgos University of Antioquia
Carl Eisdorfer
Carl Eisdorfer University of Miami
Ranjan Duara
Ranjan Duara Mount Sinai Hospital
Kenneth S. Kosik
Kenneth S. Kosik University of California, Santa Barbara

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens up diverse career opportunities, with counseling being a frequent choice for graduates. Many students look for the fastest route to licensure, especially if they want to start working as soon as possible. Fortunately, there are state-specific pathways and accelerated programs that can shorten the journey.

For instance, aspiring counselors interested in practicing in New Mexico might consider the quickest path to becoming a counselor in New Mexico. Similarly, students focused on urban settings can learn about New York accelerated counseling programs designed for fast entry into the profession.

Options also exist in other regions. Those planning to work in North Carolina may benefit from exploring the North Carolina fastest counseling programs. Meanwhile, opportunities for a rapid career start are outlined in the North Dakota fastest counseling programs.

Choosing an online psychology degree can provide the flexibility and specialization needed to meet specific state licensure requirements. Doing thorough research on available programs will help you find the best fit for your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Alfredo Ardila

Recently Published Articles