World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
48
Citations
8213
World Ranking
6230
National Ranking
2791

Sanjam Garg publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sanjam Garg sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 137 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Sanjam Garg D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sanjam Garg sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Hellman Fellow

Overview

Sanjam Garg is affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Computer Science, with a focus on several key subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Information Systems, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, and Computer Networks and Communications.

The main topics that characterize their work include Cryptography and Data Security, Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs, Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data, Cryptographic Implementations and Security, Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning, Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting, and Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption.

Sanjam Garg's publication record includes noteworthy papers such as:

  • Two-round Multiparty Secure Computation from Minimal Assumptions (2022), published in Journal of the ACM
  • Factoring and Pairings Are Not Necessary for IO: Circular-Secure LWE Suffices (2023), published by Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • Candidate iO from Homomorphic Encryption Schemes (2023), published in Journal of Cryptology
  • Deletion inference, reconstruction, and compliance in machine (un)learning (2022), published in Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies
  • Is Private Learning Possible with Instance Encoding? (2020), published on arXiv (Cornell University)

The venues where Sanjam Garg frequently publishes include arXiv (Cornell University), IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive, Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl), Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, and Journal of the ACM.

Frequent collaborators in their work are Nico Döttling, Mohammad Hajiabadi, Giulio Malavolta, Mohammad Mahmoody, and Somesh Jha.

In recognition of their contributions, Sanjam Garg received the Hellman Fellow award in 2018.

Best Publications

  • Candidate Indistinguishability Obfuscation and Functional Encryption for all Circuits

    Sanjam Garg;Craig Gentry;Shai Halevi;Mariana Raykova

  • Candidate Multilinear Maps from Ideal Lattices

    Sanjam Garg;Craig Gentry;Shai Halevi

  • Witness Encryption and its Applications.

    Sanjam Garg;Craig Gentry;Amit Sahai;Brent Waters

  • Attribute-Based Encryption for Circuits from Multilinear Maps

    Sanjam Garg;Craig Gentry;Shai Halevi;Amit Sahai

  • Protecting Obfuscation against Algebraic Attacks

    Boaz Barak;Sanjam Garg;Yael Tauman Kalai;Omer Paneth

  • Candidate Indistinguishability Obfuscation and Functional Encryption for All Circuits

    Sanjam Garg;Craig Gentry;Shai Halevi;Mariana Raykova

  • Two-Round Secure MPC from Indistinguishability Obfuscation

    Sanjam Garg;Craig Gentry;Shai Halevi;Mariana Raykova

  • TWORAM: Efficient Oblivious RAM in Two Rounds with Applications to Searchable Encryption

    Sanjam Garg;Payman Mohassel;Charalampos Papamanthou

  • Identity-Based Encryption from the Diffie-Hellman Assumption

    Nico Döttling;Sanjam Garg

  • Succinct Randomized Encodings and their Applications

    Nir Bitansky;Sanjam Garg;Huijia Lin;Rafael Pass

  • Two-Round Multiparty Secure Computation from Minimal Assumptions

    Sanjam Garg;Akshayaram Srinivasan

  • Identity-based Encryption from the Diffie-Hellman Assumption

    Nico Döttling;Sanjam Garg

  • Differing-Inputs Obfuscation and Applications.

    Prabhanjan Ananth;Dan Boneh;Sanjam Garg;Amit Sahai

  • On the Implausibility of Differing-Inputs Obfuscation and Extractable Witness Encryption with Auxiliary Input

    Sanjam Garg;Craig Gentry;Shai Halevi;Daniel Wichs

  • Fully Secure Functional Encryption without Obfuscation.

    Sanjam Garg;Craig Gentry;Shai Halevi;Mark Zhandry

  • Unified Architecture for Large-Scale Attested Metering

    M. LeMay;G. Gross;C.A. Gunter;S. Garg

  • Building efficient fully collusion-resilient traitor tracing and revocation schemes

    Sanjam Garg;Abishek Kumarasubramanian;Amit Sahai;Brent Waters

  • Functional Encryption Without Obfuscation

    Sanjam Garg;Craig Gentry;Shai Halevi;Mark Landry Zhandry

  • Laconic Oblivious Transfer and its Applications.

    Chongwon Cho;Nico Döttling;Sanjam Garg;Divya Gupta

  • Secure Obfuscation in a Weak Multilinear Map Model

    Sanjam Garg;Eric Miles;Pratyay Mukherjee;Amit Sahai

  • Revisiting the Cryptographic Hardness of Finding a Nash Equilibrium

    Sanjam Garg;Omkant Pandey;Akshayaram Srinivasan

  • Leakage-resilient zero knowledge

    Sanjam Garg;Abhishek Jain;Amit Sahai

Frequent Co-Authors

Amit Sahai
Amit Sahai University of California, Los Angeles
Craig Gentry
Craig Gentry TripleBlind
Shai Halevi
Shai Halevi Amazon (United States)
Rafail Ostrovsky
Rafail Ostrovsky University of California, Los Angeles
Zvika Brakerski
Zvika Brakerski Weizmann Institute of Science
Yuval Ishai
Yuval Ishai Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Brent Waters
Brent Waters The University of Texas at Austin
Abhishek Jain
Abhishek Jain Johns Hopkins University
Somesh Jha
Somesh Jha University of Wisconsin–Madison
Mark Zhandry
Mark Zhandry Princeton University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative online degrees can open new doors for those interested in computer science and related fields. For a fast-track option, many students begin their journey with an associate's degree online, which helps build essential technical or foundational business skills in less time.

If you’re considering a broader career in management or entrepreneurship, online business degrees can complement your tech expertise and prepare you for leadership roles within the tech sector.

Affordability remains a top concern for many learners. Fortunately, there are cheap online universities offering a range of bachelor's programs—including computer science—helping you minimize student debt while maximizing career prospects.

For those interested in applying computing to real-world problems, engineering is a natural fit. Consider an engineering online degree to balance technical software skills with hands-on knowledge in areas like robotics, data analysis, or automation.

Best Scientists Citing Sanjam Garg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles