World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 47 1335 1231 29 28 160 14639

Matteo Cianchetti publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Matteo Cianchetti between 2007 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Matteo Cianchetti published across 19 years, from 2007 to 2025, averaging 9.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2017. 33 of the 189 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2017. 2007: 1 publication 2008: 1 publication 2009: 4 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 18 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 18 publications
2007 2025

189 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Matteo Cianchetti: publications per year, 2007 to 2025
Year Publications
2007 1
2008 1
2009 4
2010 2
2011 5
2012 15
2013 5
2014 11
2015 19
2016 15
2017 20
2018 11
2019 6
2020 5
2021 6
2022 12
2023 18
2024 15
2025 18
Total 189
Download as CSV

Matteo Cianchetti publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matteo Cianchetti sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 157–166 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 160 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132 160
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Matteo Cianchetti D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matteo Cianchetti sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70 47
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Matteo Cianchetti is affiliated with Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies in Italy. Their research primarily focuses on engineering and medicine, with a significant concentration in biomedical engineering, mechanical engineering, and control and systems engineering. The scientist's work spans multiple subfields, including pulmonary and respiratory medicine and condensed matter physics.

The main research topics covered by Matteo Cianchetti include:

  • Soft Robotics and Applications
  • Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
  • Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence
  • Micro and Nano Robotics
  • Advanced Materials and Mechanics
  • Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Voice and Speech Disorders

Frequent publication venues for their research include:

  • IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
  • Advanced Intelligent Systems
  • IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Soft Robotics

Recent papers by Matteo Cianchetti cover a range of topics related to soft robotics and assistive technologies:

  • "Actuation Technologies for Soft Robot Grippers and Manipulators: A Review," 2021, Current Robotics Reports
  • "Roadmap on soft robotics: multifunctionality, adaptability and growth without borders," 2022, Multifunctional Materials
  • "Fiber Jamming Transition as a Stiffening Mechanism for Soft Robotics," 2020, Soft Robotics
  • "Plant-Inspired Soft Bistable Structures Based on Hygroscopic Electrospun Nanofibers," 2020, Advanced Materials Interfaces
  • "I-Support: A robotic platform of an assistive bathing robot for the elderly population," 2020, Robotics and Autonomous Systems

The scientist collaborates frequently with a number of coauthors, including Martina Maselli, Niccolò Pagliarani, Cecilia Laschi, Luca Arleo, and Lucrezia Lorenzon. These collaborators have contributed to multiple publications alongside Matteo Cianchetti, enhancing research output in robotics and related areas.

Best Publications

  • Soft robotics: Technologies and systems pushing the boundaries of robot abilities.

    Cecilia Laschi;Barbara Mazzolai;Matteo Cianchetti

  • Biomedical applications of soft robotics

    Matteo Cianchetti;Cecilia Laschi;Arianna Menciassi;Paolo Dario

  • Soft Robot Arm Inspired by the Octopus

    Cecilia Laschi;Matteo Cianchetti;Barbara Mazzolai;Laura Margheri

  • Soft Robotics: Review of Fluid‐Driven Intrinsically Soft Devices; Manufacturing, Sensing, Control, and Applications in Human‐Robot Interaction

    Panagiotis Polygerinos;Nikolaus Correll;Stephen A. Morin;Bobak Mosadegh

  • Stiffening in Soft Robotics: A Review of the State of the Art

    Mariangela Manti;Vito Cacucciolo;Matteo Cianchetti

  • A Bioinspired Soft Robotic Gripper for Adaptable and Effective Grasping

    Unknown

  • Soft Robotics Technologies to Address Shortcomings in Today's Minimally Invasive Surgery: The STIFF-FLOP Approach

    Unknown

  • Dynamic Model of a Multibending Soft Robot Arm Driven by Cables

    Federico Renda;Michele Giorelli;Marcello Calisti;Matteo Cianchetti

  • Soft Robotics: New Perspectives for Robot Bodyware and Control

    Cecilia Laschi;Matteo Cianchetti

  • A bioinspired soft manipulator for minimally invasive surgery.

    T Ranzani;G Gerboni;M Cianchetti;A Menciassi

  • STIFF-FLOP surgical manipulator: Mechanical design and experimental characterization of the single module

    Matteo Cianchetti;Tommaso Ranzani;Giada Gerboni;Iris De Falco

  • Soft-robotic arm inspired by the octopus: II. From artificial requirements to innovative technological solutions.

    B Mazzolai;L Margheri;M Cianchetti;P Dario

  • Design of a biomimetic robotic octopus arm.

    C Laschi;C Laschi;B Mazzolai;B Mazzolai;V Mattoli;M Cianchetti;M Cianchetti

  • Bioinspired locomotion and grasping in water: the soft eight-arm OCTOPUS robot.

    M Cianchetti;M Calisti;L Margheri;M Kuba

  • A Soft Modular Manipulator for Minimally Invasive Surgery: Design and Characterization of a Single Module

    Tommaso Ranzani;Matteo Cianchetti;Giada Gerboni;Iris De Falco

  • A 3D steady-state model of a tendon-driven continuum soft manipulator inspired by the octopus arm

    F Renda;M Cianchetti;M Giorelli;A Arienti

  • Finite Element Analysis and Design Optimization of a Pneumatically Actuating Silicone Module for Robotic Surgery Applications

    Yahya Elsayed;Augusto Vincensi;Constantina Lekakou;Tao Geng

  • Feedback Control of Soft Robot Actuators via Commercial Flex Bend Sensors

    Giada Gerboni;Alessandro Diodato;Gastone Ciuti;Matteo Cianchetti

  • Tendon-Based Stiffening for a Pneumatically Actuated Soft Manipulator

    Ali Shiva;Agostino Stilli;Yohan Noh;Angela Faragasso

  • Design concept and validation of a robotic arm inspired by the octopus

    M. Cianchetti;A. Arienti;M. Follador;B. Mazzolai

  • Actuation Technologies for Soft Robot Grippers and Manipulators: A Review

    Shadab Zaidi;Martina Maselli;Cecilia Laschi;Cecilia Laschi;Matteo Cianchetti

  • New STIFF-FLOP module construction idea for improved actuation and sensing

    J. Fras;J. Czarnowski;M. Macias;J. Glowka

Frequent Co-Authors

Cecilia Laschi
Cecilia Laschi National University of Singapore
Barbara Mazzolai
Barbara Mazzolai Italian Institute of Technology
Paolo Dario
Paolo Dario Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies
Federico Renda
Federico Renda Khalifa University
Darwin G. Caldwell
Darwin G. Caldwell Italian Institute of Technology
Kaspar Althoefer
Kaspar Althoefer Queen Mary University of London
Virgilio Mattoli
Virgilio Mattoli Italian Institute of Technology
Rolf Pfeifer
Rolf Pfeifer University of Zurich
Paolo Fiorini
Paolo Fiorini University of Verona
Mario Morino
Mario Morino University of Turin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering opens numerous doors, but it's also valuable to explore related fields and online degree options to broaden your career prospects. For instance, understanding the variety of types of therapy degrees can be insightful for those interested in integrating behavioral or human factors engineering aspects into their careers.

If a quicker educational route is a priority, examining the fastest bcba program might provide ideas on accelerated degree options, helping students enter the workforce swiftly without compromising on quality.

When considering reputable online programs, ease of entry is often a concern. Insights into what is the easiest counseling degree can guide students toward manageable programs that fit their lifestyle and commitments while still advancing their knowledge.

Finally, understanding admission challenges through resources like how hard is it to get into slp grad school can prepare students for competitive programs in specialized fields, helping them strategize their application process effectively.

Best Scientists Citing Matteo Cianchetti

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles