World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 42 6633 6404 97 94 158 6337

Jamie Paik publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jamie Paik between 2003 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jamie Paik published across 24 years, from 2003 to 2026, averaging 7.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2017. 17 of the 172 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2017. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 0 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 26 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 14 publications 2026: 3 publications
2003 2026

172 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jamie Paik: publications per year, 2003 to 2026
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 1
2005 1
2006 1
2007 0
2008 2
2009 2
2010 4
2011 2
2012 4
2013 4
2014 5
2015 10
2016 7
2017 26
2018 13
2019 18
2020 10
2021 19
2022 8
2023 8
2024 9
2025 14
2026 3
Total 172
Download as CSV

Jamie Paik publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jamie Paik sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 158–167 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 158 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415 158
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Jamie Paik D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jamie Paik sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426 42
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Jamie Paik is affiliated with École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne in Switzerland and specializes primarily in the field of Engineering. Within this broad discipline, their research focuses on subfields including Biomedical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Cognitive Neuroscience, Condensed Matter Physics, and Control and Systems Engineering.

Their work covers several topics related to robotics and materials science. Key areas include Soft Robotics and Applications, Advanced Materials and Mechanics, Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence, Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials, Micro and Nano Robotics, Tactile and Sensory Interactions, and Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics.

Significant recent papers authored or coauthored by Jamie Paik include:

  • Soft pneumatic actuator-driven origami-inspired modular robotic "pneumagami" (2020) in The International Journal of Robotics Research
  • A sEMG-Driven Soft ExoSuit Based on Twisted String Actuators for Elbow Assistive Applications (2020) in IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
  • Pneumatic Supply System Parameter Optimization for Soft Actuators (2020) in Soft Robotics
  • Kirigami Design and Modeling for Strong, Lightweight Metamaterials (2022) in Advanced Functional Materials
  • Soft Touch using Soft Pneumatic Actuator-Skin as a Wearable Haptic Feedback Device (2021) in Advanced Intelligent Systems

Jamie Paik collaborates frequently with several researchers. Notable coauthors include:

  • Sagar Joshi
  • Harshal Sonar
  • Kevin Holdcroft
  • Mustafa Mete
  • Christoph H. Belke

Their publications appear predominantly in venues such as:

  • IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
  • Advanced Intelligent Systems
  • Nature Communications
  • Soft Robotics
  • Soft Matter

In addition to journal articles, Jamie Paik has contributed to academic literature through book publications. Notably, they published a title with Springer International Publishing:

  • Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems (2024)

Best Publications

  • New soft robots really suck: Vacuum-powered systems empower diverse capabilities

    Matthew Aaron Robertson;Jamie Paik

  • Modeling, Design, and Development of Soft Pneumatic Actuators with Finite Element Method

    Philip Moseley;Juan Manuel Florez;Harshal Arun Sonar;Gunjan Agarwal

  • Designing minimal and scalable insect-inspired multi-locomotion millirobots

    Zhenishbek Zhakypov;Kazuaki Mori;Koh Hosoda;Jamie Paik

  • Characterization of silicone rubber based soft pneumatic actuators

    Yi Sun;Yun Seong Song;Jamie Paik

  • Stretchable Materials for Robust Soft Actuators towards Assistive Wearable Devices.

    Gunjan Agarwal;Nicolas Besuchet;Basile Nicolas Audergon;Jamie Paik

  • Design and Analysis of a Soft Pneumatic Actuator with Origami Shell Reinforcement

    Unknown

  • Mori: A Modular Origami Robot

    Christoph H. Belke;Jamie Paik

  • Soft Pneumatic Actuator Fascicles for High Force and Reliability

    Matthew Aaron Robertson;Hamed Sadeghi;Juan Manuel Florez;Jamie Paik

  • Modular Reconfigurable Robotics

    Jungwon Seo;Jamie Paik;Mark Yim

  • Closed-Loop Haptic Feedback Control Using a Self-Sensing Soft Pneumatic Actuator Skin.

    Harshal Arun Sonar;Aaron Powers Gerratt;Stéphanie Lacour;Jamie Paik

  • Soft pneumatic gelatin actuator for edible robotics

    Jun Shintake;Harshal Sonar;Egor Piskarev;Jamie Paik

  • Grasp Mode and Compliance Control of an Underactuated Origami Gripper Using Adjustable Stiffness Joints

    Amir Firouzeh;Jamie Paik

  • Stiffness Control With Shape Memory Polymer in Underactuated Robotic Origamis

    Amir Firouzeh;Marco Salerno;Jamie Paik

  • Robogami: A Fully Integrated Low-Profile Robotic Origami

    Amir Firouzeh;Jamie Paik

  • Variable stiffness fabrics with embedded shape memory materials for wearable applications

    Unknown

  • JammJoint: A Variable Stiffness Device Based on Granular Jamming for Wearable Joint Support

    Simon Hauser;Matthew Robertson;Auke Ijspeert;Jamie Paik

  • A novel low-profile shape memory alloy torsional actuator

    Jamie K Paik;Elliot Hawkes;Elliot Hawkes;Robert J Wood

  • Soft Pneumatic Actuator Skin with Piezoelectric Sensors for Vibrotactile Feedback

    Harshal Arun Sonar;Jamie Paik

  • A portable three-degrees-of-freedom force feedback origami robot for human–robot interactions

    Stefano Mintchev;Marco Salerno;Alexandre Cherpillod;Simone Scaduto

  • A bidirectional shape memory alloy folding actuator

    Jamie K Paik;Robert J Wood

  • An Origami-Inspired Reconfigurable Suction Gripper for Picking Objects With Variable Shape and Size

    Zhenishbek Zhakypov;Florian Heremans;Aude Billard;Jamie Paik

  • Design Methodology for Constructing Multimaterial Origami Robots and Machines

    Zhenishbek Zhakypov;Jamie Paik

  • How can human motion prediction increase transparency

    N. Jarrasse;J. Paik;V. Pasqui;G. Morel

  • Soft pneumatic actuator with adjustable stiffness layers for Multi-DoF Actuation

    Amir Firouzeh;Marco Salerno;Jamie Paik

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert J. Wood
Robert J. Wood Harvard University
Guillaume Morel
Guillaume Morel Sorbonne University
Ralph Spolenak
Ralph Spolenak ETH Zurich
Metin Sitti
Metin Sitti Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems
Gianluca Palli
Gianluca Palli University of Bologna
Stéphanie P. Lacour
Stéphanie P. Lacour École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Auke Jan Ijspeert
Auke Jan Ijspeert École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Aude Billard
Aude Billard École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Claudio Melchiorri
Claudio Melchiorri University of Bologna
Carmel Majidi
Carmel Majidi Carnegie Mellon University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a future in Engineering and Technology often means considering a range of related degrees and career options. Many students choose to broaden their expertise with specialized online programs designed for flexibility and real-world application.

For those interested in foundational roles, pursuing one of the office administration degrees can provide practical skills in communication, project management, and process optimization—skills highly valued by tech companies and engineering firms alike.

Ambitious students may opt for an online business administration degree to gain a comprehensive understanding of business operations, leadership, and strategy. This complements technical backgrounds and enhances versatility within tech-driven organizations.

Those seeking leadership roles in engineering and technology workplaces might consider an online master's in organizational leadership. This program develops expertise in managing teams, driving innovation, and fostering organizational growth.

Finally, for working professionals wanting to specialize, the best mba for operations management offers advanced training in logistics, supply chain, and operational efficiency—all crucial for dynamic sectors like engineering and technology.

Best Scientists Citing Jamie Paik

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles