World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 44 16906 15270 745 674 110 6707

Céline Chizallet publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Céline Chizallet between 2005 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Céline Chizallet published across 22 years, from 2005 to 2026, averaging 6.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2024. 19 of the 139 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2024. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 6 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 16 publications 2026: 3 publications
2005 2026

139 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Céline Chizallet: publications per year, 2005 to 2026
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 6
2007 2
2008 2
2009 5
2010 6
2011 5
2012 9
2013 6
2014 3
2015 5
2016 5
2017 7
2018 5
2019 8
2020 5
2021 7
2022 8
2023 8
2024 17
2025 16
2026 3
Total 139
Download as CSV

Céline Chizallet publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Céline Chizallet sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 110 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623 110
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Céline Chizallet D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Céline Chizallet sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808 44
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Céline Chizallet is affiliated with the French Institute of Petroleum in France. Their research primarily focuses on materials science and chemistry, with significant contributions to subfields such as materials chemistry, inorganic chemistry, and catalysis.

The scientist's main research topics include:

  • Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis
  • Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
  • Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions
  • Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis
  • Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
  • Catalysis for Biomass Conversion
  • Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications

Céline Chizallet has authored several research papers detailing molecular and atomic scale studies of catalytic materials and their properties. Notable publications include:

  • "Molecular Views on Mechanisms of Brønsted Acid-Catalyzed Reactions in Zeolites," 2023, Chemical Reviews
  • "Toward the Atomic Scale Simulation of Intricate Acidic Aluminosilicate Catalysts," 2020, ACS Catalysis
  • "Spectroscopic Expression of the External Surface Sites of H-ZSM-5," 2021, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
  • "Environment, Stability and Acidity of External Surface Sites of Silicalite-1 and ZSM-5 Micro and Nano Slabs, Sheets, and Crystals," 2020, ACS Catalysis
  • "Atomic Scale Insight into the Formation, Size, and Location of Platinum Nanoparticles Supported on γ-Alumina," 2020, ACS Catalysis

The recurring publication venues where Céline Chizallet often contributes are:

  • ACS Catalysis
  • Journal of Catalysis
  • ChemCatChem
  • The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
  • Angewandte Chemie International Edition

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Pascal Raybaud
  • Theodorus de Bruin
  • Tomáš Bučko
  • Kim Larmier
  • Mickaël Rivallan

Their work spans detailed investigations into catalytic site environments, acidity, and nanoparticle formation at atomic and molecular scales, supporting the broader fields of materials chemistry and catalysis. This research is relevant for understanding acid-catalyzed reactions in zeolites and the design of functional catalytic materials.

Best Publications

  • Catalysis of transesterification by a nonfunctionalized metal-organic framework: acido-basicity at the external surface of ZIF-8 probed by FTIR and ab initio calculations.

    Céline Chizallet;Sandrine Lazare;Delphine Bazer-Bachi;Fabien Bonnier

  • Challenges on molecular aspects of dealumination and desilication of zeolites

    Marius-Christian Silaghi;Céline Chizallet;Pascal Raybaud

  • Comparison of the behavior of metal-organic frameworks and zeolites for hydrocarbon separations.

    David Peralta;Gérald Chaplais;Angélique Simon-Masseron;Karin Barthelet

  • ZnO Oxygen Vacancies Formation and Filling Followed by in Situ Photoluminescence and in Situ EPR

    Charlotte Drouilly;Jean-Marc Krafft;Frédéric Averseng;Sandra Casale

  • Dealumination mechanisms of zeolites and extra-framework aluminum confinement

    Marius-Christian Silaghi;Céline Chizallet;Joachim Sauer;Pascal Raybaud

  • Atomic Description of the Interface between Silica and Alumina in Aluminosilicates through Dynamic Nuclear Polarization Surface-Enhanced NMR Spectroscopy and First-Principles Calculations

    Maxence Valla;Aaron J. Rossini;Maxime Caillot;Maxime Caillot;Céline Chizallet

  • H2‐Induced Reconstruction of Supported Pt Clusters: Metal–Support Interaction versus Surface Hydride

    Christophe Mager‐Maury;Christophe Mager‐Maury;Gaëtan Bonnard;Céline Chizallet;Philippe Sautet

  • Molecular Views on Mechanisms of Brønsted Acid-Catalyzed Reactions in Zeolites

    Unknown

  • Modulation of catalyst particle structure upon support hydroxylation: Ab initio insights into Pd13 and Pt13/γ-Al2O3

    Chao Hao Hu;Céline Chizallet;Christophe Mager-Maury;Manuel Corral-Valero

  • Experimental and Computational Study of Functionality Impact on Sodalite–Zeolitic Imidazolate Frameworks for CO2 Separation

    Hedi Amrouche;Sonia Aguado;Javier Pérez-Pellitero;Céline Chizallet

  • A spectroscopy and catalysis study of the nature of active sites of MgO catalysts: Thermodynamic Brønsted basicity versus reactivity of basic sites

    Marie-Laurence Bailly;Céline Chizallet;Guylène Costentin;Jean-Marc Krafft

  • Infrared characterization of hydroxyl groups on MgO: a periodic and cluster density functional theory study.

    Céline Chizallet;Guylène Costentin;Michel Che;and Françoise Delbecq

  • Pseudo‐Bridging Silanols as Versatile Brønsted Acid Sites of Amorphous Aluminosilicate Surfaces

    Céline Chizallet;Pascal Raybaud

  • Revisiting acido-basicity of the MgO surface by periodic density functional theory calculations: role of surface topology and ion coordination on water dissociation.

    Céline Chizallet;Guylène Costentin;Michel Che;Françoise Delbecq

  • Brønsted acidity of amorphous silica–alumina: The molecular rules of proton transfer

    Fabien Leydier;Fabien Leydier;Céline Chizallet;Alexandra Chaumonnot;Mathieu Digne

  • Mechanistic Investigation of Isopropanol Conversion on Alumina Catalysts: Location of Active Sites for Alkene/Ether Production

    Kim Larmier;Kim Larmier;Kim Larmier;Céline Chizallet;Nicolas Cadran;Sylvie Maury

  • The Origin of the Activity of Amine‐Functionalized Metal–Organic Frameworks in the Catalytic Synthesis of Cyclic Carbonates from Epoxide and CO2

    Tristan Lescouet;Céline Chizallet;David Farrusseng

  • External Surface of Zeolite Imidazolate Frameworks Viewed Ab Initio: Multifunctionality at the Organic−Inorganic Interface

    Céline Chizallet;Nicolas Bats

  • Regioselectivity of Al–O Bond Hydrolysis during Zeolites Dealumination Unified by Brønsted–Evans–Polanyi Relationship

    Marius-Christian Silaghi;Céline Chizallet;Elena Petracovschi;Torsten Kerber

  • Platinum Nanoclusters Stabilized on γ-Alumina by Chlorine Used As a Capping Surface Ligand: A Density Functional Theory Study

    C. Mager-Maury;C. Mager-Maury;C. Chizallet;P. Sautet;P. Raybaud

  • From γ-alumina to supported platinum nanoclusters in reforming conditions: 10 years of DFT modeling and beyond

    Pascal Raybaud;Céline Chizallet;Christophe Mager-Maury;Christophe Mager-Maury;Mathieu Digne

  • Adsorption and Separation of Xylene Isomers: CPO-27-Ni vs HKUST-1 vs NaY

    David Peralta;David Peralta;Karin Barthelet;Javier Pérez-Pellitero;Celine Chizallet

Frequent Co-Authors

Pascal Raybaud
Pascal Raybaud French Institute of Petroleum
Philippe Sautet
Philippe Sautet University of California, Los Angeles
Michel Che
Michel Che Sorbonne University
Hervé Toulhoat
Hervé Toulhoat French Institute of Petroleum
Dominique Costa
Dominique Costa Institut de Recherche de Chimie Paris
Anne Lesage
Anne Lesage École Normale Supérieure de Lyon
David Farrusseng
David Farrusseng Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
Jean-Louis Hazemann
Jean-Louis Hazemann Grenoble Alpes University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens doors to various interdisciplinary career paths, including roles in forensic science and criminal justice. For those interested in the intersection of science and law, pursuing a forensic science online degree can be a practical step. Such programs often emphasize the application of chemical principles in crime scene analysis and evidence evaluation.

Advancing further, students might consider an online master's in forensic psychology, which blends psychology with criminal investigations, offering another nuanced perspective on forensic applications.

Career opportunities in this realm are diverse. Understanding the forensic science career landscape highlights roles ranging from lab analysts to crime scene investigators, all requiring strong analytical skills and scientific knowledge, often rooted in chemistry.

Additionally, exploring the financial aspects of education is crucial. Insights into how much is a criminal justice degree can help prospective students budget effectively and make informed decisions about their educational investments.

Best Scientists Citing Céline Chizallet

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles