World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
49
Citations
13830
World Ranking
3959
National Ranking
274

J. A. Trofymow publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. A. Trofymow sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 117 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

J. A. Trofymow D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. A. Trofymow sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

J. A. Trofymow is affiliated with Natural Resources Canada and has contributed extensively to research in environmental science and related disciplines. Their work spans diverse subfields within agricultural and biological sciences, with a strong focus on forest ecology and fungal interactions.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Subfields of study cover:

  • Insect Science
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Plant Science
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Environmental Engineering

Thematic areas in their research explore:

  • Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
  • Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
  • Lichen and fungal ecology
  • Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
  • Forest ecology and management
  • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Fire effects on ecosystems

The frequent coauthors collaborating with Trofymow are:

  • Philip-Edouard Shay
  • Jason Kelley
  • Christopher Bone
  • Kendrick J. Brown
  • Tod D. Ramsfield

J. A. Trofymow has published in various academic venues, with multiple contributions to:

  • Forests
  • Canadian Journal of Forest Research
  • Journal of Fungi
  • Remote Sensing

Some of the recent papers authored or coauthored by Trofymow include:

  • Differences in Soil Fungal Communities between Forested Reclamation and Forestry Sites in the Alberta Oil Sands Region, 2023, Journal of Fungi
  • Development and wildfire dynamics of dry coastal temperate forests, BC, Canada, 2022, Canadian Journal of Forest Research
  • Combining Area-Based and Individual Tree Metrics for Improving Merchantable and Non-Merchantable Wood Volume Estimates in Coastal Douglas-Fir Forests, 2022, Remote Sensing
  • Use of Multi-Temporal LiDAR to Quantify Fertilization Effects on Stand Volume and Biomass in Late-Rotation Coastal Douglas-Fir Forests, 2021, Forests
  • Distance from the Forest Edge Influences Soil Fungal Communities Colonizing a Reclaimed Soil Borrow Site in Boreal Mixedwood Forest, 2020, Forests

Best Publications

  • Interactions of Bacteria, Fungi, and their Nematode Grazers: Effects on Nutrient Cycling and Plant Growth

    Russell E. Ingham;J. A. Trofymow;Elaine R. Ingham;David C. Coleman

  • Stoichiometric controls on carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus dynamics in decomposing litter

    Stefano Manzoni;John A. Trofymow;Robert B. Jackson;Amilcare Porporato

  • The Global Stoichiometry of Litter Nitrogen Mineralization

    Stefano Manzoni;Robert B. Jackson;John A. Trofymow;Amilcare Porporato

  • Derivation and validation of Canada-wide coarse-resolution leaf area index maps using high-resolution satellite imagery and ground measurements

    J.M Chen;G Pavlic;L Brown;J Cihlar

  • CBM-CFS3: A model of carbon-dynamics in forestry and land-use change implementing IPCC standards

    W.A. Kurz;C.C. Dymond;T.M. White;G. Stinson

  • Global decomposition experiment shows soil animal impacts on decomposition are climate-dependent

    Diana H. Wall;Mark A. Bradford;Mark G. St. John;John A. Trofymow

  • Estimating canopy structure of Douglas-fir forest stands from discrete-return LiDAR

    Nicholas C. Coops;Thomas Hilker;Michael A. Wulder;Benoît St-Onge

  • A comparison of digital and film fisheye photography for analysis of forest canopy structure and gap light transmission

    Gordon W. Frazer;Richard A. Fournier;J.A. Trofymow;Ronald J. Hall

  • 13C nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy with cross-polarization and magic-angle spinning investigation of the proximate-analysis fractions used to assess litter quality in decomposition studies

    Caroline M. Preston;J. A. (Tony) Trofymow;Junning Niu;Brian G. Sayer

  • Rates of litter decomposition over 6 years in Canadian forests: influence of litter quality and climate

    J A Trofymow;T R Moore;B Titus;C Prescott

  • Spatial patterns and competition of tree species in a Douglas-fir chronosequence on Vancouver Island

    Stephan Getzin;Charmaine Dean;Fangliang He;John A. Trofymow

  • Litter decomposition rates in Canadian forests

    T. R. Moore;J. A. Trofymow;B. Taylor;C. Prescott

  • Leaf litter decomposition-Estimates of global variability based on Yasso07 model

    Mikko Tuomi;Mikko Tuomi;T. Thum;H. Järvinen;S. Fronzek

  • Patterns of Carbon, Nitrogen and Phosphorus Dynamics in Decomposing Foliar Litter in Canadian Forests

    T. R. Moore;J. A. Trofymow;C. E. Prescott;J. Fyles

  • Chemical Changes During 6 Years of Decomposition of 11 Litters in Some Canadian Forest Sites. Part 2. 13C Abundance, Solid-State 13C NMR Spectroscopy and the Meaning of “Lignin”

    Caroline M. Preston;Jason R. Nault;J. A. Trofymow

  • Carbon dioxide fluxes in coastal Douglas-fir stands at different stages of development after clearcut harvesting

    Elyn R. Humphreys;T. Andrew Black;Kai Morgenstern;Tiebo Cai

  • Variability in litter quality and its relationship to litter decay in Canadian forests.

    Caroline M Preston;JA (Tony) Trofymow

  • Assessing tower flux footprint climatology and scaling between remotely sensed and eddy covariance measurements.

    Baozhang Chen;T. Andrew Black;Nicholas C. Coops;Thomas Hilker

  • Nature and nurture in the dynamics of C, N and P during litter decomposition in Canadian forests

    Tim R. Moore;J. A. Trofymow;Cindy E. Prescott;B. D. Titus

  • PMAS-NMR spectroscopy and chemical analysis of coarse woody debris in coastal forests of Vancouver Island

    C.M Preston;J.A Trofymow;J Niu;C.A Fyfe

Frequent Co-Authors

Caroline M. Preston
Caroline M. Preston Natural Resources Canada
Cindy E. Prescott
Cindy E. Prescott University of British Columbia
Nicholas C. Coops
Nicholas C. Coops University of British Columbia
Tim R. Moore
Tim R. Moore McGill University
Werner A. Kurz
Werner A. Kurz Natural Resources Canada
T. A. Black
T. A. Black University of British Columbia
Philip J. Burton
Philip J. Burton University of Northern British Columbia
Zoran Nesic
Zoran Nesic University of British Columbia
Robert F. Grant
Robert F. Grant University of Alberta
Rachhpal S. Jassal
Rachhpal S. Jassal University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Ecology and Evolution can open up diverse opportunities, including advanced roles in research, environmental management, and health sciences. Many professionals consider expanding their skillset through online education, as flexible learning paths are becoming increasingly popular.

For those transitioning within healthcare, accelerated options like the 6-month rn to bsn program provide a fast track to higher qualifications. If you have an associate degree and wish to become a nurse practitioner, adn to np programs online are tailored for your advancement.

Even if you don’t have a nursing background, online direct entry msn programs welcome non-nurses and offer streamlined pathways to earn a master’s in nursing. Choosing the right school is important, and comparing top rated online nursing schools wgu highlights how institutions like WGU, Chamberlain, and Capella stack up against each other for RN to BSN programs.

Whether you’re interested in healthcare or looking to merge ecology and evolutionary science with public health, these online degrees offer flexible, reputable options to advance your career and knowledge.

Best Scientists Citing J. A. Trofymow

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles