World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 98 8931 8382 4595 4251 502 34638
Genetics 98 810 762 406 379 425 33004

Mary L. Marazita publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mary L. Marazita between 1982 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mary L. Marazita published across 44 years, from 1982 to 2025, averaging 13.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 46 publications in 2021. 38 of the 582 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 46. Peak 46 publications in 2021. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 1 publication 1984: 5 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 8 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 5 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 16 publications 2004: 15 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 16 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 17 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 26 publications 2013: 27 publications 2014: 22 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 33 publications 2018: 27 publications 2019: 25 publications 2020: 20 publications 2021: 46 publications 2022: 29 publications 2023: 28 publications 2024: 19 publications 2025: 19 publications
1982 2025

582 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mary L. Marazita: publications per year, 1982 to 2025
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 1
1984 5
1985 5
1986 8
1987 4
1988 4
1989 2
1990 1
1991 1
1992 5
1993 8
1994 2
1995 4
1996 4
1997 2
1998 0
1999 6
2000 5
2001 6
2002 11
2003 16
2004 15
2005 13
2006 16
2007 14
2008 17
2009 17
2010 15
2011 16
2012 26
2013 27
2014 22
2015 19
2016 18
2017 33
2018 27
2019 25
2020 20
2021 46
2022 29
2023 28
2024 19
2025 19
Total 582
Download as CSV

Mary L. Marazita publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary L. Marazita sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 425–434 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 425 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43 425
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Mary L. Marazita D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary L. Marazita sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 98–99 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 98 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60 98
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Mary L. Marazita is affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with significant contributions in subfields such as Genetics, Molecular Biology, Periodontics, Surgery, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics, notably in Cleft Lip and Palate Research, Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments, Dental Health and Care Utilization, dental development and anomalies, Oral microbiology and periodontitis research, Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies, and Genetic Associations and Epidemiology.

Frequent publication venues for Mary L. Marazita include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Journal of Dental Research, Scientific Reports, JDR Clinical & Translational Research, and UNC Libraries.

Mary L. Marazita has collaborated extensively with several co-authors. Notable frequent collaborators are Seth M. Weinberg, John R. Shaffer, Azeez Butali, Elizabeth J. Leslie, and Jeffrey C. Murray.

Recent publications include:

  • The Human Phenotype Ontology in 2024: phenotypes around the world, 2023, Nucleic Acids Research
  • Insights into the genetic architecture of the human face, 2020, Nature Genetics
  • Expanding the genetic architecture of nicotine dependence and its shared genetics with multiple traits, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Genome-wide Enrichment of De Novo Coding Mutations in Orofacial Cleft Trios, 2020, The American Journal of Human Genetics
  • Limb development genes underlie variation in human fingerprint patterns, 2023, OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)

Best Publications

  • Cleft lip and palate: understanding genetic and environmental influences.

    Michael J. Dixon;Mary L. Marazita;Terri H. Beaty;Jeffrey C. Murray

  • Interferon regulatory factor 6 (IRF6) gene variants and the risk of isolated cleft lip or palate.

    Theresa M. Zucchero;Margaret E. Cooper;Brion S. Maher;Sandra Daack-Hirsch

  • The PhenX Toolkit: Get the Most From Your Measures

    Carol M. Hamilton;Lisa C. Strader;Joseph G. Pratt;Deborah Maiese

  • A genome-wide association study of cleft lip with and without cleft palate identifies risk variants near MAFB and ABCA4

    Terri H. Beaty;Jeffrey C. Murray;Mary L. Marazita;Ronald G. Munger

  • Detectable clonal mosaicism from birth to old age and its relationship to cancer.

    Cathy C. Laurie;Cecelia A Laurie;Kenneth Rice;Kimberly F. Doheny

  • Genetic epidemiological studies of early-onset deafness in the U.S. school-age population

    Mary L. Marazita;Lynn M. Ploughman;Brenda Rawlings;Elizabeth Remington

  • Disruption of an AP-2 alpha binding site in an IRF6 enhancer is associated with cleft lip

    Fedik Rahimov;Mary L Marazita;Axel Visel;Margaret E Cooper

  • Idiopathic congenital central hypoventilation syndrome: Analysis of genes pertinent to early autonomic nervous system embryologic development and identification of mutations in PHOX2b

    Debra E. Weese-Mayer;Elizabeth M. Berry-Kravis;Lili Zhou;Brion S. Maher

  • Genetics of cleft lip and cleft palate.

    Elizabeth J. Leslie;Mary L. Marazita

  • Anthropometric precision and accuracy of digital three-dimensional photogrammetry: comparing the Genex and 3dMD imaging systems with one another and with direct anthropometry.

    Seth M. Weinberg;Sybill Naidoo;Daniel P. Govier;Rick A. Martin

  • Genome-wide meta-analyses of nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate identify six new risk loci

    Kerstin U. Ludwig;Elisabeth Mangold;Stefan Herms;Stefanie Nowak;Stefanie Nowak

  • Maternal Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Concentrations Are Associated with Small-for-Gestational Age Births in White Women

    Lisa M. Bodnar;Janet M. Catov;Joseph M. Zmuda;Margaret E. Cooper

  • Impaired FGF signaling contributes to cleft lip and palate

    Bridget M. Riley;M. Adela Mansilla;Jinghong Ma;Sandra Daack-Hirsch

  • Medical Sequencing of Candidate Genes for Nonsyndromic Cleft Lip and Palate

    Alexandre Rezende Vieira;Joseph Ross Avila;Sandra Daack-Hirsch;Ecaterina Dragan

  • The Pittsburgh Fistula Classification System: A Standardized Scheme for the Description of Palatal Fistulas

    Darren M. Smith;Lisa Vecchione;Shao Jiang;Matthew Ford

  • Dopamine system genes and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a meta-analysis.

    Brion S. Maher;Mary L. Marazita;Robert E. Ferrell;Michael M. Vanyukov

  • Digital three-dimensional photogrammetry: evaluation of anthropometric precision and accuracy using a Genex 3D camera system.

    Seth M. Weinberg;Nicole M. Scott;Katherine Neiswanger;Carla A. Brandon

  • Meta-analysis of 13 genome scans reveals multiple cleft lip/palate genes with novel loci on 9q21 and 2q32-35

    Mary L. Marazita;Jeffrey C. Murray;Andrew C. Lidral;Mauricio Arcos-Burgos

  • A specific requirement for PDGF-C in palate formation and PDGFR-alpha signaling.

    Hao Ding;Xiaoli Wu;Hans Boström;Injune Kim

  • Evidence for Autosomal Dominant Inheritance and Race-Specific Heterogeneity in Early-Onset Periodontitis

    Mary L. Marazita;John A. Burmeister;John C. Gunsolley;Thomas E. Koertge

Frequent Co-Authors

Eleanor Feingold
Eleanor Feingold University of Pittsburgh
Daniel W. McNeil
Daniel W. McNeil West Virginia University
Jeffrey C. Murray
Jeffrey C. Murray University of Iowa
Terri H. Beaty
Terri H. Beaty Johns Hopkins University
Jacqueline T. Hecht
Jacqueline T. Hecht The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Ingo Ruczinski
Ingo Ruczinski Johns Hopkins University
Kaare Christensen
Kaare Christensen University of Southern Denmark
Alan F. Scott
Alan F. Scott Johns Hopkins University
Mads Melbye
Mads Melbye University of Copenhagen
Andrew C. Lidral
Andrew C. Lidral University of Iowa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in genetics or related healthcare fields, numerous online degree and certification options exist. These programs offer the flexibility to balance busy schedules with educational advancement. Some options even provide accelerated formats, allowing you to earn credentials quickly and efficiently.

For registered nurses looking to expand their qualifications, rn to bsn no practicum programs are available. These degrees help nurses advance their careers without requiring additional clinical hours, making them ideal for working professionals.

Those pursuing advanced practice roles may seek the shortest post master's dnp program or explore easy dnp programs to achieve their doctoral goals more efficiently. These programs allow for faster completion and streamlined coursework.

If you are considering an entry-level healthcare career, medical assistant certification programs can provide pathways to employment in as few as six weeks. This makes them a practical choice for those eager to join the workforce quickly.

Best Scientists Citing Mary L. Marazita

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles