World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
64
Citations
12685
World Ranking
2809
National Ranking
353

Gudrun E. Moore publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gudrun E. Moore sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 200 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Gudrun E. Moore D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gudrun E. Moore sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gudrun E. Moore is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research activity spans multiple areas of biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine, with a particular focus on genetics and pediatric health.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Medicine

Within these broader fields, the notable subfields of study that characterize their work are:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
  • Surgery
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

The primary topics covered in their research include:

  • Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
  • Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Congenital heart defects research
  • Renal and related cancers
  • Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
  • Circular RNAs in diseases

Moore's publication record features papers in established journals and platforms, including:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Medical Genetics
  • Frontiers in Endocrinology
  • Scientific Reports
  • Nucleic Acids Research

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Moore include:

  • Phenotype of genetically confirmed Silver-Russell syndrome beyond childhood, 2020, Journal of Medical Genetics
  • Emerging phenotypes linked to variants in SAMD9 and MIRAGE syndrome, 2022, Frontiers in Endocrinology
  • Diverse species-specific phenotypic consequences of loss of function sorting nexin 14 mutations, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Analysis of CDKN1C in fetal growth restriction and pregnancy loss, 2020, F1000Research
  • Tissue- and ethnicity-independent hypervariable DNA methylation states show evidence of establishment in the early human embryo, 2022, Nucleic Acids Research

Frequent collaborators in Moore's body of work include:

  • Miho Ishida
  • Jenifer P. Suntharalingham
  • Ignacio del Valle
  • Nita Solanky
  • John C. Achermann

Best Publications

  • Maternal activating KIRs protect against human reproductive failure mediated by fetal HLA-C2

    Susan E. Hiby;Richard Apps;Andrew M. Sharkey;Lydia E. Farrell

  • Genetics of cleft lip and palate: syndromic genes contribute to the incidence of non-syndromic clefts

    Philip Stanier;Gudrun E. Moore

  • Diagnosis and management of Silver–Russell syndrome: first international consensus statement

    Emma L. Wakeling;Frédéric Brioude;Frédéric Brioude;Oluwakemi Lokulo-Sodipe;Oluwakemi Lokulo-Sodipe;Susan M. O'Connell

  • The primate-specific microRNA gene cluster (C19MC) is imprinted in the placenta

    Marie Noguer-Dance;Marie Noguer-Dance;Sayeda Abu-Amero;Mohamed Al-Khtib;Annick Lefèvre

  • The T-box transcription factor gene TBX22 is mutated in X-linked cleft palate and ankyloglossia.

    Claire Braybrook;Kit Doudney;Ana Carolina B. Marçano;Alfred Arnason

  • The importance of imprinting in the human placenta.

    Jennifer M. Frost;Gudrun E. Moore

  • Multiple Congenital Melanocytic Nevi and Neurocutaneous Melanosis Are Caused by Postzygotic Mutations in Codon 61 of NRAS

    Veronica A Kinsler;Anna C Thomas;Miho Ishida;Neil W Bulstrode

  • Limited evolutionary conservation of imprinting in the human placenta

    D. Monk;P. Arnaud;S. Apostolidou;F. A. Hills

  • Functional Variants of the Central Bile Acid Sensor FXR Identified in Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy

    Saskia W.C. van Mil;Alexandra Milona;Peter H. Dixon;Roman Mullenbach

  • Human Chromosome 7: DNA Sequence and Biology

    Stephen W. Scherer;Joseph Cheung;Jeffrey R. MacDonald;Lucy R. Osborne

  • Contribution of Variant Alleles of ABCB11 to Susceptibility to Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy.

    P H Dixon;S W C van Mil;J Chambers;S Strautnieks

  • Routine addition of human insulin-like growth factor-I ligand could benefit clinical in-vitro fertilization culture

    A. D. Lighten;G. E. Moore;R. M. L. Winston;K. Hardy

  • The role of imprinted genes in humans.

    Miho Ishida;Gudrun E. Moore

  • The genetic aetiology of Silver–Russell syndrome

    Sayeda Abu-Amero;David Monk;Jennifer Frost;Michael Preece

  • An association between variants in the IGF2 gene and Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome: interaction between genotype and epigenotype

    Adele Murrell;Sarah Heeson;Wendy N. Cooper;Eleanor J. Douglas

  • TBX22 mutations are a frequent cause of cleft palate

    A C B Marçano;K Doudney;C Braybrook;R Squires

  • Elevated placental expression of the imprinted PHLDA2 gene is associated with low birth weight

    S. Apostolidou;S. Abu-Amero;K. O’Donoghue;J. Frost

  • Valproic Acid Confers Functional Pluripotency to Human Amniotic Fluid Stem Cells in a Transgene-free Approach

    Dafni Moschidou;Sayandip Mukherjee;Michael P Blundell;Katharina Drews

  • Duplication of 7p11.2-p13, Including GRB10, in Silver-Russell Syndrome

    David Monk;David Monk;Emma L Wakeling;Emma L Wakeling;Virginia Proud;Megan Hitchins

  • Epigenotype–phenotype correlations in Silver–Russell syndrome

    EL Wakeling;S Abu Amero;M Alders;J Bliek

Frequent Co-Authors

Philip Stanier
Philip Stanier University College London
Phillip R. Bennett
Phillip R. Bennett Imperial College London
Neil J. Sebire
Neil J. Sebire Great Ormond Street Hospital
Eugene Healy
Eugene Healy University of Southampton
Stephen W. Scherer
Stephen W. Scherer University of Toronto
Kazuhiko Nakabayashi
Kazuhiko Nakabayashi National Center For Child Health and Development
Andrew J. Copp
Andrew J. Copp University College London
Robert Newton
Robert Newton University of Calgary
robert feil
robert feil Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Robert Williamson
Robert Williamson University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying genetics can lead to a variety of careers in healthcare, research, and biotechnology. For those seeking alternative or complementary paths, online degrees in healthcare support fields are increasingly popular and accessible.

Many students explore affordable options, such as online programs in medical billing and coding. If you're curious about how much does it cost to become a medical billing and coding specialist, online courses can offer cost-effective solutions with flexible schedules.

Nursing is another in-demand field for those interested in genetics-related patient care. There are easy nursing colleges to get into for students who want straightforward admission processes and accessible degree pathways.

For those interested in healthcare leadership, an online health administration program can provide a fast track to management roles in clinics, hospitals, or research organizations. Some learners prefer to start with the health administration degree that best fits their budget and career goals.

These options offer diverse career pathways that can complement or serve as alternatives to genetics, making entry into the healthcare sector more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Gudrun E. Moore

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles