World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
80
Citations
24032
World Ranking
17086
National Ranking
1545

Phillip R. Bennett publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Phillip R. Bennett sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 404 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Phillip R. Bennett D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Phillip R. Bennett sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Phillip R. Bennett is affiliated with Imperial College London in the United Kingdom and has contributed extensively to the fields of Medicine and Immunology and Microbiology. Their research spans multiple subfields including Epidemiology, Microbiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Immunology, and Rheumatology.

Key topics of Phillip R. Bennett's work include:

  • Reproductive tract infections research
  • Reproductive System and Pregnancy
  • Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
  • Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
  • Urinary Tract Infections Management
  • Cervical Cancer and HPV Research

The scientist has published papers in several frequent venues, notably:

  • Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Human Reproduction
  • Nature Communications
  • Research Square (Research Square)

Among their recent publications are:

  • "Miscarriage matters: the epidemiological, physical, psychological, and economic costs of early pregnancy loss" (2021) in The Lancet
  • "The vaginal microbiota associates with the regression of untreated cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 lesions" (2020) in Nature Communications
  • "Incidence and mortality from cervical cancer and other malignancies after treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature" (2020) in Annals of Oncology
  • "Recurrent miscarriage: evidence to accelerate action" (2021) in The Lancet
  • "The pregnancy microbiome and preterm birth" (2020) in Seminars in Immunopathology

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • David A. MacIntyre
  • T. Bourne
  • Lynne Sykes
  • M. Al-Memar
  • Yun Sok Lee

Best Publications

  • Identification of mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells in human first-trimester fetal blood, liver, and bone marrow

    Cesare Campagnoli;Irene A. G. Roberts;Sailesh Kumar;Phillip R. Bennett

  • CLASP - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF LOW-DOSE ASPIRIN FOR THE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF PREECLAMPSIA AMONG 9364 PREGNANT-WOMEN

    G Beroyz;R Casale;A Farreiros;M Palermo

  • Miscarriage matters: the epidemiological, physical, psychological, and economic costs of early pregnancy loss

    Siobhan Quenby;Siobhan Quenby;Ioannis D Gallos;Rima K Dhillon-Smith;Marcelina Podesek

  • The vaginal microbiome during pregnancy and the postpartum period in a European population

    David A. MacIntyre;Manju Chandiramani;Yun S. Lee;Lindsay Kindinger

  • Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia disease progression is associated with increased vaginal microbiome diversity

    A. Mitra;A. Mitra;D. A. MacIntyre;Y. S. Lee;A. Smith

  • Adverse obstetric outcomes after local treatment for cervical preinvasive and early invasive disease according to cone depth: systematic review and meta-analysis

    Maria Kyrgiou;Antonios Athanasiou;Maria Paraskevaidi;Anita Mitra

  • Vaginal progesterone prophylaxis for preterm birth (the OPPTIMUM study): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind trial

    Jane Elizabeth Norman;Neil Marlow;Claudia-Martina Messow;Andrew Shennan

  • The vaginal microbiota, human papillomavirus infection and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: what do we know and where are we going next?

    Anita Mitra;Anita Mitra;David A. MacIntyre;Julian Roberto Marchesi;Julian Roberto Marchesi;Yun S. Lee

  • Prenatal Determination of Fetal RhD Type by DNA Amplification

    P.R. Bennett;C. Le Van Kim;Y. Colin;R.M. Warwick

  • The role of nuclear factor kappa B in human labour.

    Tamsin M Lindström;Phillip R Bennett

  • The Th1:Th2 Dichotomy of Pregnancy and Preterm Labour

    Lynne Sykes;David A. MacIntyre;Xiao J. Yap;Tiong Ghee Teoh

  • Human labour is associated with nuclear factor-κB activity which mediates cyclo-oxygenase-2 expression and is involved with the ‘functional progesterone withdrawal’

    V.C. Allport;D. Pieber;D.M. Slater;R. Newton

  • The interaction between vaginal microbiota, cervical length, and vaginal progesterone treatment for preterm birth risk

    Lindsay M. Kindinger;Lindsay M. Kindinger;Phillip R. Bennett;Phillip R. Bennett;Yun S Lee;Julian R. Marchesi;Julian R. Marchesi

  • Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for cervical intraepithelial lesions and early invasive disease

    Maria Kyrgiou;Antonios Athanasiou;Ilkka E. J. Kalliala;Maria Paraskevaidi

  • Preterm labor: Stimulation of arachidonic acid metabolism in human amnion cells by bacterial products

    Phillip R. Bennett;Mathew P. Rose;Leslie Myatt;Murdoch G. Elder

  • Interactions between progesterone receptor isoforms in myometrial cells in human labour

    Doris Pieber;Victoria C. Allport;Frank Hills;Mark R. Johnson

  • Vaginal dysbiosis increases risk of preterm fetal membrane rupture, neonatal sepsis and is exacerbated by erythromycin

    Richard G. Brown;Julian R. Marchesi;Julian R. Marchesi;Yun S. Lee;Ann Smith

  • Fertility and early pregnancy outcomes after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Maria Kyrgiou;Anita Mitra;Marc Arbyn;Sofia Melina Stasinou

  • Prediction of intrapartum fetal compromise using the cerebroumbilical ratio: a prospective observational study

    Tomas Prior;Edward Mullins;Phillip Bennett;Sailesh Kumar

  • Vaginal Progesterone Prophylaxis for Preterm Birth (the OPPTIMUM Study): A Multicentre, Randomised, Double-blind Trial

    Jane Elizabeth Norman;Neil Marlow;Claudia-Martina Messow;Andrew Shennan

Frequent Co-Authors

Tom Bourne
Tom Bourne Imperial College London
Nicholas M. Fisk
Nicholas M. Fisk University of Queensland
Andrew Shennan
Andrew Shennan King's College London
Julian R. Marchesi
Julian R. Marchesi Imperial College London
Irene Roberts
Irene Roberts University of Oxford
Gudrun E. Moore
Gudrun E. Moore University College London
Jan J. Brosens
Jan J. Brosens University of Warwick
Elaine Holmes
Elaine Holmes Imperial College London
Paul T. Seed
Paul T. Seed King's College London
Simon N. Waddington
Simon N. Waddington University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine opens doors to a variety of related fields and flexible degree options. Many students look into roles that support healthcare, such as medical billing and coding. With programs offering medical billing and coding financial aid, starting a healthcare career can be more accessible and affordable.

For aspiring nurses, traditional admissions tests can be a barrier. Fortunately, some schools offer lpn to rn programs without teas test requirements, streamlining the path from practical to registered nursing.

Students seeking leadership roles may be interested in an online healthcare administration degree. These programs prepare graduates for management positions within hospitals and clinics, and many can be completed on an accelerated timeline.

Nurses with an ADN can also advance to higher practice roles with bridge programs. The adn to np pathway is designed for those who want to become nurse practitioners, offering streamlined progression through advanced nursing education.

Best Scientists Citing Phillip R. Bennett

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles