World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
104
Citations
36251
World Ranking
7103
National Ranking
691

Paul T. Seed publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul T. Seed sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 576 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Paul T. Seed D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul T. Seed sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 104 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul T. Seed is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom and has contributed extensively to medical research, particularly in the fields of medicine and related subfields. Their publication record includes 393 works in Medicine, with significant specialization in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (102 publications), Obstetrics and Gynecology (97), Epidemiology (46), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (43), and Surgery (18).

The main research topics covered by Paul T. Seed focus on maternal and child health and include:

  • Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Birth, Development, and Health
  • Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
  • Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Maternal and fetal healthcare
  • Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Neonatal Respiratory Health Research

Paul T. Seed has co-authored work with a number of frequent collaborators, including Andrew Shennan (79 joint publications), Lucy C. Chappell (70), Lucilla Poston (43), Jane Sandall (30), and Carolyn Gill (23).

The scientist's studies have been published in a variety of venues with multiple contributions to:

  • Pregnancy Hypertension (12 publications)
  • Research Square (8)
  • Health Technology Assessment (7)
  • BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth (7)
  • BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (6)

Among recent notable papers by Paul T. Seed are:

  • "The effect of smoking on COVID-19 severity: A systematic review and meta-analysis," 2020, Journal of Medical Virology
  • "Ursodeoxycholic acid in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis," 2021, The Lancet. Gastroenterology & Hepatology
  • "The impact of chronic kidney disease Stages 3-5 on pregnancy outcomes," 2020, Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
  • "Maternal dysglycaemia, changes in the infant's epigenome modified with a diet and physical activity intervention in pregnancy: Secondary analysis of a randomised control trial," 2020, PLoS Medicine
  • "Effects of race and ethnicity on perinatal outcomes in high-income and upper-middle-income countries: an individual participant data meta-analysis of 2,198,655 pregnancies," 2022, The Lancet

Best Publications

  • Effect of Antioxidants on the Occurrence of Pre-Eclampsia in Women at Increased Risk: A Randomised Trial

    Lucy C. Chappell;Paul T. Seed;Annette L. Briley;Frank J. Kelly

  • Development and evaluation of evidence based risk assessment tool (STRATIFY) to predict which elderly inpatients will fall: case-control and cohort studies

    D Oliver;M Britton;P Seed;F C Martin

  • Vitamin C and vitamin E in pregnant women at risk for pre-eclampsia (VIP trial): randomised placebo-controlled trial.

    Lucilla Poston;A L Briley;Paul Seed;Frank Kelly

  • Chronic Hypertension and Pregnancy Outcomes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    K. Bramham;B. Parnell;C. Nelson-Piercy;P.T. Seed

  • Effect of a behavioural intervention in obese pregnant women (the UPBEAT study): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial

    Lucilla Poston;Ruth Bell;Helen Croker;Angela C Flynn

  • Eccrine porocarcinoma (malignant eccrine poroma): a clinicopathologic study of 69 cases.

    A Robson;J Greene;N Ansari;B Kim

  • Randomized double‐blind study of cyclosporin in chronic ‘idiopathic’ urticaria

    C.E.H. Grattan;B.F. O’Donnell;D.M. Francis;N. Niimi

  • Diagnostic accuracy of placental growth factor in women with suspected preeclampsia: a prospective multicenter study

    Lucy C. Chappell;Suzy Duckworth;Paul T. Seed;Melanie Griffin

  • Association of severe intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy with adverse pregnancy outcomes: a prospective population-based case-control study.

    Victoria Geenes;Lucy C. Chappell;Paul T. Seed;Philip J. Steer

  • A longitudinal study of biochemical variables in women at risk of preeclampsia

    Lucy C. Chappell;Paul T. Seed;Anisette Briley;Frank J. Kelly

  • Adverse Perinatal Outcomes and Risk Factors for Preeclampsia in Women With Chronic Hypertension: A Prospective Study

    Lucy C. Chappell;Stephen Enye;Paul Seed;Annette L. Briley

  • Gender-Linked Hypertension in Offspring of Lard-Fed Pregnant Rats

    Imran Y. Khan;Paul D. Taylor;Vasia Dekou;Paul T. Seed

  • Association of adverse perinatal outcomes of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy with biochemical markers: results of aggregate and individual patient data meta-analyses.

    Caroline Ovadia;Paul T Seed;Alexandros Sklavounos;Victoria Geenes

  • Quality of Life, Employment Status, and Anginal Symptoms After Coronary Angioplasty or Bypass Surgery 3-Year Follow-up in the Randomized Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA) Trial

    Stuart J. Pocock;Robert A. Henderson;Paul Seed;Tom Treasure

  • Chronic idiopathic urticaria: Comparison of the clinical features of patients with and without anti-FcϵRI or anti-IgE autoantibodies

    R.A. Sabroe;P.T. Seed;D.M. Francis;R.M. Barr

  • CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY VERSUS CORONARY-ARTERY BYPASS-SURGERY - THE RANDOMIZED INTERVENTION TREATMENT OF ANGINA (RITA) TRIAL

    Hampton;Ra Henderson;Dg Julian;J Parker

  • The effect of smoking on COVID-19 severity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Rohin K. Reddy;Walton N. Charles;Alexandros Sklavounos;Atul Dutt

  • Classification of anti-FcϵRI and anti-IgE autoantibodies in chronic idiopathic urticaria and correlation with disease severity

    Ruth A. Sabroe;Edda Fiebiger;David M. Francis;Dieter Maurer

  • Anaesthesia for Caesarean section and neonatal acid‐base status: a meta‐analysis*

    F. Reynolds;P. T. Seed

  • A prospective controlled study of the effect of intramural uterine fibroids on the outcome of assisted conception.

    Roger Hart;Yacoub Khalaf;Cheng-Toh Yeong;Paul Seed

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew Shennan
Andrew Shennan King's College London
Lucilla Poston
Lucilla Poston King's College London
Naveed Sattar
Naveed Sattar University of Glasgow
Keith M. Godfrey
Keith M. Godfrey University of Southampton
Paul McCrone
Paul McCrone King's College London
Scott M. Nelson
Scott M. Nelson University of Glasgow
Laura H. Goldstein
Laura H. Goldstein King's College London
Peter R. Schofield
Peter R. Schofield Neuroscience Research Australia
Christopher W.G. Redman
Christopher W.G. Redman University of Oxford
Peter von Dadelszen
Peter von Dadelszen King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Medicine in the USA opens doors to a variety of rewarding online healthcare degrees. For those aiming to become advanced practice nurses, attending the cheapest np school online can be a budget-friendly way to become a nurse practitioner. Understanding how much does online nursing school cost is essential for anyone considering this path, as tuition can vary widely depending on the program and your residency status.

Those with a nursing background seeking to boost their credentials can benefit from rn to bsn online programs, which offer flexible learning for working professionals. For individuals interested in teaching, research, or leadership in healthcare, exploring phd nursing programs can lead to advanced career opportunities.

Whether you’re just starting out or looking to specialize, online medical and nursing degrees offer accessible ways to advance your healthcare career in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Paul T. Seed

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles