World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Stephen M. Jane

Stephen M. Jane

D-Index & Metrics

Molecular Biology

D-Index
50
Citations
9345
World Ranking
2572
National Ranking
61

Stephen M. Jane publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen M. Jane sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 161 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

Stephen M. Jane D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen M. Jane sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2015 - Fellow of the Australian Academy of Health and Medical Science

Overview

Stephen M. Jane is a researcher affiliated with Monash University in Australia, with a focus on medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their work extensively covers molecular biology, public health, oncology, hematology, and immunology.

The scientist's research topics include:

  • Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
  • Cancer Cells and Metastasis
  • Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
  • Immune Cell Function and Interaction
  • Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology
  • Cancer-related gene regulation
  • Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer

Their recent notable publications include:

  • "YBX1 integration of oncogenic PI3K/mTOR signalling regulates the fitness of malignant epithelial cells," 2023, published in Nature Communications
  • "Small molecule inhibition of Dynamin-dependent endocytosis targets multiple niche signals and impairs leukemia stem cells," 2020, published in Nature Communications
  • "The Hsp70 chaperone system: distinct roles in erythrocyte formation and maintenance," 2021, published in Haematologica
  • "Inactivation of Zeb1 in GRHL2-deficient mouse embryos rescues mid-gestation viability and secondary palate closure," 2020, published in Disease Models & Mechanisms
  • "STAT5 activation promotes progression and chemotherapy-resistance in early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia," 2023, published in Blood

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Stephen M. Jane include:

  • Marina R. Carpinelli
  • Nadeem Hafeez Butt
  • Zihao Deng
  • David J. Curtis
  • Alana Auden

The scientist regularly publishes in venues such as Nature Communications, Developmental Dynamics, SSRN Electronic Journal, Blood, and Haematologica. Three of their publications have appeared in Nature Communications, while multiple works are found in Developmental Dynamics and SSRN Electronic Journal.

Stephen M. Jane was recognized as a Fellow of the Australian Academy of Health and Medical Science in 2015.

Best Publications

  • PRMT5-mediated methylation of histone H4R3 recruits DNMT3A, coupling histone and DNA methylation in gene silencing.

    Quan Zhao;Quan Zhao;Gerhard Rank;Yuen T Tan;Haitao Li

  • Genetically tagging endothelial cells in vivo: bone marrow-derived cells do not contribute to tumor endothelium.

    Joachim R. Göthert;Sonja E. Gustin;J. Anke M. van Eekelen;Uli Schmidt

  • A Homolog of Drosophila grainy head Is Essential for Epidermal Integrity in Mice

    Stephen B. Ting;Jacinta Caddy;Nikki Hislop;Tomasz Wilanowski

  • Enforced expression of the GATA-2 transcription factor blocks normal hematopoiesis.

    Derek A. Persons;James A. Allay;Esther R. Allay;Richard A. Ashmun

  • The critical regulator of embryonic hematopoiesis, SCL, is vital in the adult for megakaryopoiesis, erythropoiesis, and lineage choice in CFU-S12

    Mark A. Hall;David J. Curtis;Donald Metcalf;Andrew G. Elefanty

  • The Lmo2 Oncogene Initiates Leukemia in Mice by Inducing Thymocyte Self-Renewal

    Matthew P. McCormack;Matthew P. McCormack;Lauren F. Young;Sumitha Vasudevan;Carolyn A. de Graaf

  • Targeting of the Tumor Suppressor GRHL3 by a miR-21-Dependent Proto-Oncogenic Network Results in PTEN Loss and Tumorigenesis

    Charbel Darido;Smitha R. Georgy;Tomasz Wilanowski;Sebastian Dworkin

  • Single-chain antigen recognition receptors that costimulate potent rejection of established experimental tumors

    Nicole M Haynes;Joseph A Trapani;Michèle W L Teng;Jacob T Jackson

  • Epidermal wound repair is regulated by the planar cell polarity signaling pathway

    Jacinta Caddy;Tomasz Wilanowski;Charbel Darido;Sebastian Dworkin

  • Redirecting mouse CTL against colon carcinoma: superior signaling efficacy of single-chain variable domain chimeras containing TCR-zeta vs Fc epsilon RI-gamma.

    Nicole M. Haynes;Marie B. Snook;Joseph A. Trapani;Loretta Cerruti

  • Purification of the human NF-E2 complex: cDNA cloning of the hematopoietic cell-specific subunit and evidence for an associated partner.

    Paul A. Ney;Nancy C. Andrews;Stephen M. Jane;Brian Safer

  • The tumour-suppressor Scribble dictates cell polarity during directed epithelial migration: regulation of Rho GTPase recruitment to the leading edge.

    Lukas E. Dow;Lukas E. Dow;Jeff S. Kauffman;Jacinta Caddy;A. S. Peterson

  • Inositol- and folate-resistant neural tube defects in mice lacking the epithelial-specific factor Grhl-3.

    Stephen Bek Ngie Ting;Tomasz Wilanowski;Alana Auden;Mark A Hall

  • A highly conserved novel family of mammalian developmental transcription factors related to Drosophila grainyhead.

    Tomasz Wilanowski;Annabel Tuckfield;Loretta Cerruti;Sinead O'Connell

  • Identification of a stage selector element in the human gamma-globin gene promoter that fosters preferential interaction with the 5' HS2 enhancer when in competition with the beta-promoter.

    Stephen M. Jane;Paul A. Ney;Elio F. Vanin;Deborah L. Gumucio

  • Rejection of syngeneic colon carcinoma by CTLs expressing single-chain antibody receptors codelivering CD28 costimulation.

    Nicole M. Haynes;Joseph A. Trapani;Michele W. L. Teng;Jacob T. Jackson

  • Spatial and temporal expression of the Grainyhead-like transcription factor family during murine development.

    Alana Auden;Jacinta Caddy;Tomasz Wilanowski;Stephen B. Ting

  • Perturbed desmosomal cadherin expression in grainy head-like 1-null mice

    Tomasz Wilanowski;Jacinta Caddy;Stephen B Ting;Nikki R Hislop

  • Methylation-enhanced binding of Sp1 to the stage selector element of the human gamma-globin gene promoter may regulate development specificity of expression.

    Stephen M. Jane;Deborah L. Gumucio;Paul A. Ney;John M. Cunningham

  • Hemoglobin switching in man and chicken is mediated by a heteromeric complex between the ubiquitous transcription factor CP2 and a developmentally specific protein.

    S.M. Jane;A.W. Nienhuis;J.M. Cunningham

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark J. Smyth
Mark J. Smyth QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
Phillip K. Darcy
Phillip K. Darcy Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
Benjamin T. Kile
Benjamin T. Kile University of Adelaide
Joseph A. Trapani
Joseph A. Trapani Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
Peter J. Anderson
Peter J. Anderson Monash University
Michael H. Kershaw
Michael H. Kershaw Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
Michele W. L. Teng
Michele W. L. Teng QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
Douglas J. Hilton
Douglas J. Hilton Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research
Phillip J. Robinson
Phillip J. Robinson Children's Medical Research Institute
Simon J. Foote
Simon J. Foote Australian National University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Molecular Biology can open doors to various online degree options and healthcare careers in the USA. For nursing professionals, online bridge programs provide accelerated advancement. If you're wondering how to become nurse practitioner quickly, there are several direct and flexible pathways available.

Nurses who currently hold an RN license may benefit from the fastest rn to bsn program online, designed for rapid upskilling. Additionally, those looking to progress from ADN to advanced roles can explore various adn to np programs online. These options enable students to bridge the gap between associate and master’s degrees without lengthy interruptions to their careers.

Non-nursing graduates interested in entering advanced nursing positions can pursue direct entry msn programs for non nurses online. These accelerated programs are ideal for career-changers with a science background, including molecular biology. Each pathway can help you leverage your scientific expertise and transition into impactful healthcare roles.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen M. Jane

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles