World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
42
Citations
10456
World Ranking
8227
National Ranking
3529

Richard A. Kemmerer publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard A. Kemmerer sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 130 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Richard A. Kemmerer D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard A. Kemmerer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1997 - ACM Fellow For contributions in the areas of formal specification and verification of systems, computer system security and reliability, specification language design, and software engineering.
  • 1995 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to formal methods in reliability and security of computer systems.

Overview

Richard A. Kemmerer is affiliated with the University of California, Santa Barbara in the United States. Their professional focus includes areas related to computer systems, particularly in formal specification and verification, system security, and software engineering.

The scientist has received recognition through notable awards. In 1995, they were named an IEEE Fellow for contributions to formal methods in reliability and security of computer systems. Two years later, in 1997, they were also honored as an ACM Fellow, recognized for their work in formal specification and verification of systems, specification language design, and reliability and security in computer systems.

Their academic career has been associated with research efforts in the following areas:

  • Formal specification and verification of systems
  • Computer system security and reliability
  • Specification language design
  • Software engineering

No recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, or book publications are listed, which limits insight into the recent scope of their research output.

Best Publications

  • State transition analysis: a rule-based intrusion detection approach

    K. Ilgun;R.A. Kemmerer;P.A. Porras

  • Your botnet is my botnet: analysis of a botnet takeover

    Brett Stone-Gross;Marco Cova;Lorenzo Cavallaro;Bob Gilbert

  • Comprehensive approach to intrusion detection alert correlation

    F. Valeur;G. Vigna;C. Kruegel;R.A. Kemmerer

  • Intrusion detection: a brief history and overview

    R.A. Kemmerer;G. Vigna

  • STATL: an attack language for state-based intrusion detection

    Steven T. Eckmann;Giovanni Vigna;Richard A. Kemmerer

  • NetSTAT: a network-based intrusion detection approach

    G. Vigna;R.A. Kemmerer

  • NetSTAT: a network-based intrusion detection system

    Giovanni Vigna;Richard A. Kemmerer

  • Behavior-based spyware detection

    Engin Kirda;Christopher Kruegel;Greg Banks;Giovanni Vigna

  • Stateful intrusion detection for high-speed network's

    C. Kruegel;F. Valeur;G. Vigna;R. Kemmerer

  • SNOOZE: toward a stateful network protocol fuzZEr

    Greg Banks;Marco Cova;Viktoria Felmetsger;Kevin Almeroth

  • Shared resource matrix methodology: an approach to identifying storage and timing channels

    Unknown

  • Using Generalization and Characterization Techniques in the Anomaly-based Detection of Web Attacks.

    William K. Robertson;Giovanni Vigna;Christopher Krügel;Richard A. Kemmerer

  • A stateful intrusion detection system for World-Wide Web servers

    G. Vigna;W. Robertson;Vishal Kher;R.A. Kemmerer

  • An intrusion detection tool for AODV-based ad hoc wireless networks

    G. Vigna;S. Gwalani;K. Srinivasan;E.M. Belding-Royer

  • Analyzing encryption protocols using formal verification techniques

    R.A. Kemmerer

  • Penetration state transition analysis: A rule-based intrusion detection approach

    Unknown

  • Understanding fraudulent activities in online ad exchanges

    Brett Stone-Gross;Ryan Stevens;Apostolis Zarras;Richard Kemmerer

  • The Underground Economy of Fake Antivirus Software

    Brett Stone-Gross;Ryan Abman;Richard A. Kemmerer;Christopher Kruegel

  • The STAT tool suite

    G. Vigna;S.T. Eckmann;R.A. Kemmerer

  • An experience developing an IDS stimulator for the black-box testing of network intrusion detection systems

    D. Mutz;G. Vigna;R. Kemmerer

  • Using hidden markov models to evaluate the risks of intrusions

    André Årnes;Fredrik Valeur;Giovanni Vigna;Richard A. Kemmerer

  • Proceedings of the 20th international conference on Software engineering

    Koji Torii;Kokichi Futatsugi;Richard A. Kemmerer

Frequent Co-Authors

Giovanni Vigna
Giovanni Vigna University of California, Santa Barbara
Christopher Kruegel
Christopher Kruegel University of California, Santa Barbara
Oscar H. Ibarra
Oscar H. Ibarra University of California, Santa Barbara
Tevfik Bultan
Tevfik Bultan University of California, Santa Barbara
William Robertson
William Robertson Northeastern University
Falko Dressler
Falko Dressler Technical University of Berlin
Georg Carle
Georg Carle Technical University of Munich
Jianwen Su
Jianwen Su University of California, Santa Barbara
Carlo Ghezzi
Carlo Ghezzi Polytechnic University of Milan

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Computer Science opens up a variety of online learning options and alternative career pathways across multiple fields. If you’re looking for a quick start, consider exploring what is the easiest associate's degree to get. Associate degrees offer a faster route to entry-level technology positions or can serve as a stepping stone before earning your bachelor’s degree.

For those interested in expanding into academia or administration, an edd in educational leadership can help prepare for leadership roles in educational technology or higher education.

It’s essential to choose programs from online degree programs accredited to ensure your qualifications are recognized by employers and further educational institutions.

Additionally, if you are passionate about gaming and technology, exploring a video game design degree could align your interests with a growing industry.

Whether you’re at the beginning of your educational journey or seeking to specialize, these diverse online pathways can help you achieve your career aspirations in tech and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Richard A. Kemmerer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles