World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
87
Citations
35572
World Ranking
13469
National Ranking
6848

Julie M. Fritz publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julie M. Fritz sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 308 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Julie M. Fritz D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julie M. Fritz sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Julie M. Fritz is a researcher affiliated with the University of Utah in the United States. Their work primarily focuses on medicine, with a strong emphasis on pharmacology, public health, environmental and occupational health, general health professions, economics and econometrics, and pathology and forensic medicine.

The scientist's research covers a range of topics related to musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation, including health systems and economic evaluations, quality of life, spine and intervertebral disc pathology, opioid use disorder treatment, pain management and placebo effect, pain management and opioid use, as well as fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome research.

Frequent publication venues for this researcher include Pain Medicine, Physical Therapy, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Journal of Pain, and Pain. The publication record indicates a significant contribution to these fields, particularly targeting issues related to pain management and rehabilitation.

Among the recent papers authored or co-authored by the researcher are:

  • "Interventions for the Management of Acute and Chronic Low Back Pain: Revision 2021," published in 2021 in the Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy
  • "TIDieR-telehealth: precision in reporting of telehealth interventions used in clinical trials - unique considerations for the Template for the Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist," published in 2022 in BMC Medical Research Methodology
  • "Evidence-based interventions to treat chronic low back pain: treatment selection for a personalized medicine approach," published in 2022 in PAIN Reports
  • "Pivoting to virtual delivery for managing chronic pain with nonpharmacological treatments: implications for pragmatic research," published in 2020 in Pain
  • "Dedicated emergency department physical therapy is associated with reduced imaging, opioid administration, and length of stay: A prospective observational study," published in 2020 in PLoS ONE

The scientist frequently collaborates with colleagues such as John Magel, Daniel I. Rhon, Anne Thackeray, Richard L. Skolasky, and Elizabeth Lane. These coauthors appear regularly in various collaborative research efforts, contributing to the fields related to pain management and rehabilitation.

Best Publications

  • What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention

    Jan Hartvigsen;Mark J Hancock;Alice Kongsted;Quinette Louw

  • Prevention and treatment of low back pain: evidence, challenges, and promising directions.

    Nadine E Foster;Johannes R Anema;Dan Cherkin;Roger Chou

  • Responsiveness of the Numeric Pain Rating Scale in Patients with Low Back Pain

    John D. Childs;Sara R. Piva;Julie M. Fritz

  • A Comparison of a Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale

    Julie M Fritz;James J Irrgang

  • Low back pain: a call for action

    Rachelle Buchbinder;Maurits van Tulder;Birgitta Öberg;Lucíola Menezes Costa

  • A Clinical Prediction Rule To Identify Patients with Low Back Pain Most Likely To Benefit from Spinal Manipulation: A Validation Study

    John D. Childs;Julie M. Fritz;Timothy W. Flynn;James J. Irrgang

  • Preliminary Development of a Clinical Prediction Rule for Determining Which Patients With Low Back Pain Will Respond to a Stabilization Exercise Program

    Gregory E. Hicks;Julie M. Fritz;Anthony Delitto;Stuart M. McGill

  • A clinical prediction rule for classifying patients with low back pain who demonstrate short-term improvement with spinal manipulation.

    Timothy Flynn;Julie Fritz;Julie Whitman;Robert Wainner

  • The role of fear-avoidance beliefs in acute low back pain: relationships with current and future disability and work status.

    Julie M. Fritz;Steven Z. George;Anthony Delitto

  • Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of the clinical examination and patient self-report measures for cervical radiculopathy.

    Robert S. Wainner;Julie M. Fritz;James J. Irrgang;Michael L. Boninger

  • Identifying subgroups of patients with acute/subacute "nonspecific" low back pain: results of a randomized clinical trial.

    Gerard P. Brennan;Julie M. Fritz;Stephen J. Hunter;Anne Thackeray

  • Comparison of Classification-Based Physical Therapy With Therapy Based on Clinical Practice Guidelines for Patients with Acute Low Back Pain : A Randomized Clinical Trial

    Julie M. Fritz;Anthony Delitto;Richard E. Erhard

  • Subgrouping Patients With Low Back Pain: Evolution of a Classification Approach to Physical Therapy

    Julie M. Fritz;Joshua A. Cleland;Joshua A. Cleland;Joshua A. Cleland;John D. Childs

  • The reliability and construct validity of the Neck Disability Index and patient specific functional scale in patients with cervical radiculopathy.

    Joshua A. Cleland;Julie M. Fritz;Julie M. Whitman;Jessica A. Palmer

  • Identifying psychosocial variables in patients with acute work-related low back pain: the importance of fear-avoidance beliefs.

    Julie M Fritz;Steven Z George

  • Reliability of Rehabilitative Ultrasound Imaging of the Transversus Abdominis and Lumbar Multifidus Muscles

    Shane L. Koppenhaver;Shane L. Koppenhaver;Jeffrey J. Hebert;Julie M. Fritz;Julie M. Fritz;Eric C. Parent

  • Interrater reliability of clinical examination measures for identification of lumbar segmental instability.

    Gregory E Hicks;Julie M Fritz;Anthony Delitto;John Mishock

  • The effect of a fear-avoidance-based physical therapy intervention for patients with acute low back pain: results of a randomized clinical trial.

    Steven Z. George;Julie M. Fritz;T. Joel E. Bialosky;Douglas A. Donald

  • Development of a Clinical Prediction Rule for Guiding Treatment of a Subgroup of Patients With Neck Pain: Use of Thoracic Spine Manipulation, Exercise, and Patient Education

    Joshua A Cleland;John D Childs;Julie M Fritz;Julie M Whitman

  • Interventions for the Management of Acute and Chronic Low Back Pain: Revision 2021

    Steven Z George;Julie M Fritz;Sheri P Silfies;Michael J Schneider

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven Z. George
Steven Z. George Duke University
Tom Greene
Tom Greene University of Utah
Maurits W. van Tulder
Maurits W. van Tulder Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
James J. Irrgang
James J. Irrgang University of Pittsburgh
Raymond W. J. G. Ostelo
Raymond W. J. G. Ostelo Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Christopher G. Maher
Christopher G. Maher University of Sydney
Karon F. Cook
Karon F. Cook Northwestern University
Nadine E. Foster
Nadine E. Foster University of Queensland
Henrica C.W. de Vet
Henrica C.W. de Vet University of Amsterdam
Rachelle Buchbinder
Rachelle Buchbinder Monash University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring careers in medicine goes beyond becoming a physician. For those who want to advance their healthcare career online, several accessible degree pathways exist. Many nurses are now opting for rn to bsn programs no clinicals to upgrade their qualifications without the traditional in-person requirements. These programs offer flexibility for working professionals.

If you’re aiming for advanced practice roles, doctoral tracks like the fastest msn to dnp program and other online DNP options offer streamlined, accelerated pathways. Some even allow you to complete your degree through an dnp program without clinical hours, making them attractive for nurses balancing work and study.

Entry-level healthcare careers are also becoming more attainable. Aspiring nurses can complete their studies quickly through the fastest lpn program options, offered fully online in some cases. Whether you are starting out or advancing in your medical journey, online degrees open new doors in healthcare with increased speed and flexibility.

Best Scientists Citing Julie M. Fritz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles