World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Peter Tyedmers

Peter Tyedmers

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
46
Citations
11049
World Ranking
5978
National Ranking
255

Peter Tyedmers publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Tyedmers sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 98 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Peter Tyedmers D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Tyedmers sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Tyedmers is affiliated with Dalhousie University in Canada and conducts research primarily focused on environmental science and agricultural and biological sciences. Their work spans several interconnected subfields including ecology, global and planetary change, aquatic science, general health professions, and environmental engineering.

Their main research topics include agriculture sustainability and environmental impact, aquaculture nutrition and growth, marine bivalve and aquaculture studies, environmental impact and sustainability, climate change and health impacts, healthcare cost, quality, practices, and food waste reduction and sustainability.

Peter Tyedmers has contributed to various publications in well-recognized scientific venues. Recent papers include:

  • Environmental performance of blue foods, 2021, Nature
  • Operating in a Climate Crisis: A State-of-the-Science Review of Life Cycle Assessment within Surgical and Anesthetic Care, 2021, Environmental Health Perspectives
  • Assessing seafood nutritional diversity together with climate impacts informs more comprehensive dietary advice, 2022, Communications Earth & Environment
  • Potential socioeconomic impacts from ocean acidification and climate change effects on Atlantic Canadian fisheries, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • Life cycle inventory and emissions modelling in organic field crop LCA studies: review and recommendations, 2022, Resources Conservation and Recycling

Frequent publication venues include:

  • Nature
  • Environmental Health Perspectives
  • Communications Earth & Environment
  • PLoS ONE
  • Resources Conservation and Recycling

Peter Tyedmers collaborates often with several co-authors, such as:

  • Robert Parker
  • Friederike Ziegler
  • Kathleen Mifflin
  • Sean Christie
  • Daniel Rainham

Their research addresses critical environmental and sustainability challenges related to food systems, fisheries, aquaculture, and healthcare practices. These topics are reflected in their interdisciplinary approach combining ecological, environmental, and health professions perspectives.

Best Publications

  • The future for fisheries.

    Daniel Pauly;Jackie Alder;Elena Bennett;Villy Christensen

  • Does aquaculture add resilience to the global food system

    Max Troell;Max Troell;Rosamond L. Naylor;Marc Metian;Malcolm Beveridge

  • Sustainability and Global Seafood

    Martin D. Smith;Cathy A. Roheim;Larry B. Crowder;Benjamin S. Halpern

  • Environmental performance of blue foods

    Jessica A. Gephart;Patrik J. G. Henriksson;Patrik J. G. Henriksson;Patrik J. G. Henriksson;Robert W. R. Parker;Alon Shepon;Alon Shepon;Alon Shepon

  • Forecasting potential global environmental costs of livestock production 2000–2050

    Nathan Pelletier;Peter Tyedmers

  • Fueling Global Fishing Fleets

    Peter H Tyedmers;Reg Watson;Daniel Pauly

  • Contrasting and comparing sustainable development indicator metrics

    Jeffrey Wilson;Peter Tyedmers;Ronald Pelot

  • Not All Salmon Are Created Equal: Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Global Salmon Farming Systems

    Nathan Pelletier;Peter Tyedmers;Ulf Sonesson;Astrid Scholz

  • Fuel use and greenhouse gas emissions of world fisheries

    Robert W. R. Parker;Robert W. R. Parker;Julia L. Blanchard;Caleb Gardner;Bridget S. Green

  • Assessing alternative aquaculture technologies: life cycle assessment of salmonid culture systems in Canada

    Nathan W. Ayer;Peter H. Tyedmers

  • Feeding farmed salmon: Is organic better?

    N. Pelletier;P. Tyedmers

  • Fuel price increase, subsidies, overcapacity, and resource sustainability

    Ussif Rashid Sumaila;Louise Teh;Reg Watson;Peter Tyedmers

  • Impact categories for life cycle assessment research of seafood production systems: Review and prospectus

    Nathan L. Pelletier;Nathan W. Ayer;Peter H. Tyedmers;Sarah A. Kruse

  • Life cycle environmental impacts of wine production and consumption in Nova Scotia, Canada

    E. Point;P. Tyedmers;C. Naugler

  • Life cycle environmental impacts of Spanish tuna fisheries

    Almudena Hospido;Peter Tyedmers

  • Fisheries and Energy Use

    Peter Tyedmers

  • Fuel consumption of global fishing fleets: current understanding and knowledge gaps

    Robert W R Parker;Peter H Tyedmers

  • Scenario Modeling Potential Eco-Efficiency Gains from a Transition to Organic Agriculture: Life Cycle Perspectives on Canadian Canola, Corn, Soy, and Wheat Production

    N. Pelletier;N. Arsenault;P. Tyedmers

  • Co-Product Allocation in Life Cycle Assessments of Seafood Production Systems: Review of Problems and Strategies

    Nathan W. Ayer;Peter H. Tyedmers;Nathan L. Pelletier;Ulf Sonesson

  • Operating in a Climate Crisis: A State-of-the-Science Review of Life Cycle Assessment within Surgical and Anesthetic Care

    Jonathan Drew;Sean D. Christie;Peter Tyedmers;Jenna Smith-Forrester

  • Life Cycle Assessment of Frozen Tilapia Fillets From Indonesian Lake‐Based and Pond‐Based Intensive Aquaculture Systems

    Nathan Pelletier;Peter Tyedmers

Frequent Co-Authors

Max Troell
Max Troell Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
Daniel Pauly
Daniel Pauly University of British Columbia
Reg Watson
Reg Watson University of Tasmania
Ulf Sonesson
Ulf Sonesson RISE Research Institutes of Sweden
Frank Asche
Frank Asche University of Florida
Ian Vázquez-Rowe
Ian Vázquez-Rowe Pontifical Catholic University of Peru
Larry B. Crowder
Larry B. Crowder Stanford University
Anthony Charles
Anthony Charles Saint Mary's University
Carl Folke
Carl Folke Stockholm University
Martin D. Smith
Martin D. Smith Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in advancing their expertise in Environmental Sciences, online doctoral programs offer flexible options tailored to diverse career goals. Many students prefer doctoral programs online no dissertation, which emphasize practical research and applied learning over traditional dissertation requirements. This approach suits professionals aiming to integrate advanced knowledge without the extensive time commitment of a dissertation.

Additionally, professionals who already hold an education specialist degree can explore the streamlined pathway of an eds to edd program. These programs provide an efficient transition to earn a Doctor of Education (EdD) while focusing on leadership and policy aspects relevant to environmental education and advocacy.

For those interested in social aspects linked to environmental issues, the dsw program offers an affordable route to gain advanced clinical and leadership skills. This degree is particularly valuable for working with communities impacted by environmental challenges.

Finally, if you are starting your academic journey or seeking a broad interdisciplinary foundation, accredited affordable online general studies degree programs provide a flexible and budget-friendly option. These programs build critical thinking and communication skills essential for diverse career pathways in environmental sciences and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Tyedmers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles