World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Peter Tyedmers

Peter Tyedmers

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 46 5978 5735 255 241 98 11049

Peter Tyedmers publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter Tyedmers between 1994 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter Tyedmers published across 33 years, from 1994 to 2026, averaging 3.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2007. 2 of the 102 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2007. 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 5 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 1 publication 2026: 1 publication
1994 2026

102 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter Tyedmers: publications per year, 1994 to 2026
Year Publications
1994 1
1995 1
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 1
2001 5
2002 0
2003 1
2004 2
2005 3
2006 2
2007 10
2008 4
2009 6
2010 10
2011 2
2012 5
2013 7
2014 5
2015 7
2016 2
2017 3
2018 5
2019 6
2020 2
2021 3
2022 3
2023 0
2024 4
2025 1
2026 1
Total 102
Download as CSV

Peter Tyedmers publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Tyedmers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 98 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440 98
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter Tyedmers D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Tyedmers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291 46
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Peter Tyedmers is affiliated with Dalhousie University in Canada and conducts research primarily focused on environmental science and agricultural and biological sciences. Their work spans several interconnected subfields including ecology, global and planetary change, aquatic science, general health professions, and environmental engineering.

Their main research topics include agriculture sustainability and environmental impact, aquaculture nutrition and growth, marine bivalve and aquaculture studies, environmental impact and sustainability, climate change and health impacts, healthcare cost, quality, practices, and food waste reduction and sustainability.

Peter Tyedmers has contributed to various publications in well-recognized scientific venues. Recent papers include:

  • Environmental performance of blue foods, 2021, Nature
  • Operating in a Climate Crisis: A State-of-the-Science Review of Life Cycle Assessment within Surgical and Anesthetic Care, 2021, Environmental Health Perspectives
  • Assessing seafood nutritional diversity together with climate impacts informs more comprehensive dietary advice, 2022, Communications Earth & Environment
  • Potential socioeconomic impacts from ocean acidification and climate change effects on Atlantic Canadian fisheries, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • Life cycle inventory and emissions modelling in organic field crop LCA studies: review and recommendations, 2022, Resources Conservation and Recycling

Frequent publication venues include:

  • Nature
  • Environmental Health Perspectives
  • Communications Earth & Environment
  • PLoS ONE
  • Resources Conservation and Recycling

Peter Tyedmers collaborates often with several co-authors, such as:

  • Robert Parker
  • Friederike Ziegler
  • Kathleen Mifflin
  • Sean Christie
  • Daniel Rainham

Their research addresses critical environmental and sustainability challenges related to food systems, fisheries, aquaculture, and healthcare practices. These topics are reflected in their interdisciplinary approach combining ecological, environmental, and health professions perspectives.

Best Publications

  • The future for fisheries.

    Daniel Pauly;Jackie Alder;Elena Bennett;Villy Christensen

  • Does aquaculture add resilience to the global food system

    Max Troell;Max Troell;Rosamond L. Naylor;Marc Metian;Malcolm Beveridge

  • Sustainability and Global Seafood

    Martin D. Smith;Cathy A. Roheim;Larry B. Crowder;Benjamin S. Halpern

  • Environmental performance of blue foods

    Jessica A. Gephart;Patrik J. G. Henriksson;Patrik J. G. Henriksson;Patrik J. G. Henriksson;Robert W. R. Parker;Alon Shepon;Alon Shepon;Alon Shepon

  • Forecasting potential global environmental costs of livestock production 2000–2050

    Nathan Pelletier;Peter Tyedmers

  • Fueling Global Fishing Fleets

    Peter H Tyedmers;Reg Watson;Daniel Pauly

  • Contrasting and comparing sustainable development indicator metrics

    Jeffrey Wilson;Peter Tyedmers;Ronald Pelot

  • Not All Salmon Are Created Equal: Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Global Salmon Farming Systems

    Nathan Pelletier;Peter Tyedmers;Ulf Sonesson;Astrid Scholz

  • Fuel use and greenhouse gas emissions of world fisheries

    Robert W. R. Parker;Robert W. R. Parker;Julia L. Blanchard;Caleb Gardner;Bridget S. Green

  • Assessing alternative aquaculture technologies: life cycle assessment of salmonid culture systems in Canada

    Nathan W. Ayer;Peter H. Tyedmers

  • Feeding farmed salmon: Is organic better?

    N. Pelletier;P. Tyedmers

  • Fuel price increase, subsidies, overcapacity, and resource sustainability

    Ussif Rashid Sumaila;Louise Teh;Reg Watson;Peter Tyedmers

  • Impact categories for life cycle assessment research of seafood production systems: Review and prospectus

    Nathan L. Pelletier;Nathan W. Ayer;Peter H. Tyedmers;Sarah A. Kruse

  • Life cycle environmental impacts of wine production and consumption in Nova Scotia, Canada

    E. Point;P. Tyedmers;C. Naugler

  • Life cycle environmental impacts of Spanish tuna fisheries

    Almudena Hospido;Peter Tyedmers

  • Fisheries and Energy Use

    Peter Tyedmers

  • Fuel consumption of global fishing fleets: current understanding and knowledge gaps

    Robert W R Parker;Peter H Tyedmers

  • Scenario Modeling Potential Eco-Efficiency Gains from a Transition to Organic Agriculture: Life Cycle Perspectives on Canadian Canola, Corn, Soy, and Wheat Production

    N. Pelletier;N. Arsenault;P. Tyedmers

  • Co-Product Allocation in Life Cycle Assessments of Seafood Production Systems: Review of Problems and Strategies

    Nathan W. Ayer;Peter H. Tyedmers;Nathan L. Pelletier;Ulf Sonesson

  • Operating in a Climate Crisis: A State-of-the-Science Review of Life Cycle Assessment within Surgical and Anesthetic Care

    Jonathan Drew;Sean D. Christie;Peter Tyedmers;Jenna Smith-Forrester

  • Life Cycle Assessment of Frozen Tilapia Fillets From Indonesian Lake‐Based and Pond‐Based Intensive Aquaculture Systems

    Nathan Pelletier;Peter Tyedmers

Frequent Co-Authors

Max Troell
Max Troell Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
Daniel Pauly
Daniel Pauly University of British Columbia
Reg Watson
Reg Watson University of Tasmania
Ulf Sonesson
Ulf Sonesson RISE Research Institutes of Sweden
Frank Asche
Frank Asche University of Florida
Ian Vázquez-Rowe
Ian Vázquez-Rowe Pontifical Catholic University of Peru
Larry B. Crowder
Larry B. Crowder Stanford University
Anthony Charles
Anthony Charles Saint Mary's University
Carl Folke
Carl Folke Stockholm University
Martin D. Smith
Martin D. Smith Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in advancing their expertise in Environmental Sciences, online doctoral programs offer flexible options tailored to diverse career goals. Many students prefer doctoral programs online no dissertation, which emphasize practical research and applied learning over traditional dissertation requirements. This approach suits professionals aiming to integrate advanced knowledge without the extensive time commitment of a dissertation.

Additionally, professionals who already hold an education specialist degree can explore the streamlined pathway of an eds to edd program. These programs provide an efficient transition to earn a Doctor of Education (EdD) while focusing on leadership and policy aspects relevant to environmental education and advocacy.

For those interested in social aspects linked to environmental issues, the dsw program offers an affordable route to gain advanced clinical and leadership skills. This degree is particularly valuable for working with communities impacted by environmental challenges.

Finally, if you are starting your academic journey or seeking a broad interdisciplinary foundation, accredited affordable online general studies degree programs provide a flexible and budget-friendly option. These programs build critical thinking and communication skills essential for diverse career pathways in environmental sciences and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Tyedmers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles