World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 41 7979 7447 4270 3884 95 5941

Pélagie M. Beeson publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Pélagie M. Beeson between 1990 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Pélagie M. Beeson published across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025, averaging 2.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2013. 4 of the 104 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2013. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 4 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 4 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 6 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 3 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 1 publication 2024: 3 publications 2025: 1 publication
1990 2025

104 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Pélagie M. Beeson: publications per year, 1990 to 2025
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 1
1992 0
1993 3
1994 0
1995 5
1996 1
1997 4
1998 4
1999 1
2000 4
2001 0
2002 2
2003 6
2004 3
2005 4
2006 3
2007 2
2008 6
2009 1
2010 6
2011 2
2012 4
2013 10
2014 2
2015 6
2016 2
2017 1
2018 3
2019 6
2020 2
2021 3
2022 1
2023 1
2024 3
2025 1
Total 104
Download as CSV

Pélagie M. Beeson publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pélagie M. Beeson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 95 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 95
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Pélagie M. Beeson D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pélagie M. Beeson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 41
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Pélagie M. Beeson is affiliated with the University of Arizona in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields including neuroscience, psychology, and medicine, with a specific focus on cognitive neuroscience, developmental and educational psychology, education, rehabilitation, and public health.

Their main topics of work encompass neurobiology of language and bilingualism, reading and literacy development, stroke rehabilitation and recovery, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, medical education and admissions, evaluation of teaching practices, and language development and disorders.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Beeson include Kindle Rising, Steven Z. Rapcsak, Aneta Kielar, Alyssa Sachs, and Aileen Wong.

Key publication venues in which Beeson has contributed are Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, Cognitive Neuropsychology, and Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research.

Major recent papers authored or co-authored by Beeson include:

  • Common predictors of spoken and written language performance in aphasia, alexia, and agraphia, 2022, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Other significant related works in the field, though not authored by Beeson, include:

  • Engaging Faculty in Shifting Toward Holistic Review: Changing Graduate Admissions Procedures at a Land-Grant, Hispanic-Serving Institution, 2021, American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
  • Examining speech motor planning difficulties in apraxia of speech and aphasia via the sequential production of phonetically similar words, 2020, Cognitive Neuropsychology
  • Positive changes to written language following phonological treatment in logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia: Case report, 2023, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • Addressing Phonological Deficit in Primary Progressive Aphasia With Behavioral Intervention and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, 2025, Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research

Best Publications

  • Evaluating Single-Subject Treatment Research: Lessons Learned from the Aphasia Literature

    Pélagie M. Beeson;Pélagie M. Beeson;Randall R. Robey

  • Phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia: cognitive mechanisms and neural substrates.

    Steven Z. Rapcsak;Pélagie M. Beeson;Maya L. Henry;Anne Leyden

  • Cost function masking during normalization of brains with focal lesions: still a necessity?

    Sarah M. Andersen;Steven Z. Rapcsak;Pélagie M. Beeson

  • Translational Research in Aphasia: From Neuroscience to Neurorehabilitation

    Anastasia M. Raymer;Pelagie Beeson;Audrey Holland;Diane Kendall

  • Auditory processing in individuals with mild aphasia: A study of resource allocation

    Laura L. Murray;Audrey L. Holland;Pelagie M. Beeson

  • The role of left posterior inferior temporal cortex in spelling.

    Steven Z. Rapcsak;Pélagie M. Beeson

  • The neural substrates of writing: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study

    Pelagie M. Beeson;Steven Z. Rapcsak;Elena Plante;Jullyn Chargualaf

  • Spoken Language of Individuals With Mild Fluent Aphasia Under Focused and Divided-Attention Conditions

    Laura L. Murray;Audrey L. Holland;Pelagie M. Beeson

  • Positive Effects of Language Treatment for the Logopenic Variant of Primary Progressive Aphasia

    Pélagie M. Beeson;Rachel M. King;Borna Bonakdarpour;Maya L. Henry

  • Treating acquired writing impairment: strengthening graphemic representations

    Pelagie M. Beeson

  • The Efficacy of a Semantic Cueing Procedure on Naming Performance of Adults With Aphasia

    Soren Lowell;Pelagie M. Beeson;Audrey L. Holland

  • Do Dual-Route Models Accurately Predict Reading and Spelling Performance in Individuals with Acquired Alexia and Agraphia?

    Steven Z. Rapcsak;Maya L. Henry;Sommer L. Teague;Susan D. Carnahan

  • The role of left perisylvian cortical regions in spelling.

    Maya L. Henry;Pélagie M. Beeson;Amy J. Stark;Steven Z. Rapcsak

  • A Treatment Sequence for Phonological Alexia/Agraphia

    Pélagie M. Beeson;Kindle Rising;Esther S. Kim;Steven Z. Rapcsak

  • Examining the value of lexical retrieval treatment in primary progressive aphasia: two positive cases.

    Maya L Henry;K. Rising;A. T. DeMarco;B. L. Miller

  • Efficient Visual Object and Word Recognition Relies on High Spatial Frequency Coding in the Left Posterior Fusiform Gyrus: Evidence from a Case-Series of Patients with Ventral Occipito-Temporal Cortex Damage

    Daniel J. Roberts;Anna M. Woollams;Esther Kim;Pelagie M. Beeson

  • Neuroanatomical Correlates of Spelling and Writing

    Steven Z. Rapcsak;Pélagie M. Beeson

  • Memory impairment and executive control in individuals with stroke-induced aphasia.

    Pelagie M. Beeson;Kathryn A. Bayles;Alan B. Rubens;Alfred W. Kaszniak

  • Comprehension and production of written words

    Pélagie M. Beeson;Maya L. Henry

  • Combining Treatment for Written and Spoken Naming

    Pélagie M. Beeson;Heather Egnor

Frequent Co-Authors

Maya L. Henry
Maya L. Henry The University of Texas at Austin
Stephen M. Wilson
Stephen M. Wilson Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Audrey Holland
Audrey Holland University of Arizona
Laura L. Murray
Laura L. Murray University of Western Ontario
Marcus Meinzer
Marcus Meinzer Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Kathryn A. Bayles
Kathryn A. Bayles University of Arizona
Elena Plante
Elena Plante University of Arizona
Cynthia K. Thompson
Cynthia K. Thompson Northwestern University
Alfred W. Kaszniak
Alfred W. Kaszniak University of Arizona
Bruce Crosson
Bruce Crosson Emory University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to a wide range of rewarding online degrees and career pathways, especially in substance abuse counseling. Online psychology programs now offer specialized tracks for students interested in counseling roles, addiction support, and mental health services.

One popular option is becoming a substance abuse counselor, a role that combines psychology knowledge with real-world impact. The journey to this career can vary by location. To learn more about how to become a substance abuse counselor in Memphis, explore the specific education and licensing requirements unique to that city.

Requirements differ across metropolitan areas. For instance, see the substance abuse counselor requirements in Mesa for local certification details, or look into becoming a substance abuse counselor in Miami to understand the steps involved there.

Each state and city may have its own guidelines and training needs, such as you’ll find in this resource for how to become a substance abuse counselor in Milwaukee. Carefully researching these pathways ensures you fulfill all necessary criteria and are well-prepared for a career in this vital field.

Best Scientists Citing Pélagie M. Beeson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles