World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 89 12761 12012 6520 6031 693 27129

Joseph A. Smith publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Joseph A. Smith between 1962 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Joseph A. Smith published across 64 years, from 1962 to 2025, averaging 11.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 68 publications in 2005. 15 of the 731 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1962 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 68. Peak 68 publications in 2005. 1962: 2 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 2 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 2 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 1 publication 1973: 1 publication 1974: 1 publication 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 4 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 4 publications 1984: 10 publications 1985: 9 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 9 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 9 publications 1990: 8 publications 1991: 10 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 10 publications 1995: 10 publications 1996: 13 publications 1997: 16 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 15 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 20 publications 2003: 29 publications 2004: 41 publications 2005: 68 publications 2006: 22 publications 2007: 37 publications 2008: 25 publications 2009: 31 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 31 publications 2012: 30 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 30 publications 2017: 23 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 21 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 5 publications
1962 2025

731 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Joseph A. Smith: publications per year, 1962 to 2025
Year Publications
1962 2
1963 0
1964 2
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 2
1971 0
1972 1
1973 1
1974 1
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 4
1980 2
1981 2
1982 3
1983 4
1984 10
1985 9
1986 5
1987 9
1988 4
1989 9
1990 8
1991 10
1992 7
1993 8
1994 10
1995 10
1996 13
1997 16
1998 3
1999 9
2000 15
2001 11
2002 20
2003 29
2004 41
2005 68
2006 22
2007 37
2008 25
2009 31
2010 15
2011 31
2012 30
2013 7
2014 17
2015 9
2016 30
2017 23
2018 19
2019 21
2020 18
2021 17
2022 4
2023 12
2024 10
2025 5
Total 731
Download as CSV

Joseph A. Smith publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph A. Smith sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 681–700 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 693 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336 693
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Joseph A. Smith D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph A. Smith sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 88–89 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970 89
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Joseph A. Smith is affiliated with Vanderbilt University Medical Center in the United States. Their research spans several interdisciplinary fields, primarily focusing on biomedical engineering and computer vision, alongside contributions to animal science and public health.

Their published work covers topics such as global health and surgery, global health workforce issues, advanced neural network applications, catalysis for biomass conversion, biofuel production and bioconversion, supercapacitor materials and fabrication, and meteorological phenomena and simulations.

Frequent coauthors in their research include Zheming Zuo, Jonathan Stonehouse, Bogusław Obara, Danielle D. Sweeney, and Christina B. Ching.

Joseph A. Smith has contributed to multiple publication venues, including:

  • The Journal of Urology
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis
  • Optics Express
  • Current Bladder Dysfunction Reports

Among the recent papers featuring their participation are:

  • "Improving the production of furfural from cellulose catalytic pyrolysis using WO3/γ-Al2O3 composite oxides," 2022, Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis
  • "Turbulence strength C n2 estimation from video using physics-based deep learning," 2022, Optics Express
  • "Benefits of an International Volunteer Experience in Residency Training," 2020, Current Bladder Dysfunction Reports
  • "Modular Clause Composition in Plautus," 2021, Mnemosyne
  • "MP30-01 IMPACT AT 20 YEARS: IVUMED BY THE NUMBERS," 2022, The Journal of Urology

The subfields of study associated with their work highlight a multidisciplinary approach and include:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Emergency Medical Services

Best Publications

  • The long-term effect of doxazosin, finasteride, and combination therapy on the clinical progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

    John D. McConnell;Claus G. Roehrborn;Oliver M. Bautista;Gerald L. Andriole

  • A randomized trial of intravesical doxorubicin and immunotherapy with bacille Calmette-Guérin for transitional-cell carcinoma of the bladder.

    Lamm Dl;Blumenstein Ba;Crawford Ed;Montie Je

  • Robot-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer (RAZOR): an open-label, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial

    Dipen J Parekh;Isildinha M Reis;Erik P Castle;Mark L Gonzalgo

  • Postoperative nomogram predicting risk of recurrence after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.

    Bernard H. Bochner;Guido Dalbagni;Michael W. Kattan;Paul Fearn

  • Analysis of Early Complications After Radical Cystectomy: Results of a Collaborative Care Pathway

    Sam S. Chang;Michael S. Cookson;Roxelyn G. Baumgartner;Nancy Wells

  • Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: what is the learning curve?

    S. Duke Herrell;Joseph A. Smith

  • A Comparison of the Incidence and Location of Positive Surgical Margins in Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy and Open Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy

    Joseph A. Smith;Robert C. Chan;Sam S. Chang;S. Duke Herrell

  • CLINICAL UNDER STAGING OF HIGH RISK NONMUSCLE INVASIVE UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA TREATED WITH RADICAL CYSTECTOMY

    Sajal C. Dutta;Joseph A. Smith;Scott B. Shappell;Christopher S. Coffey

  • Randomized Prospective Evaluation of Extended Versus Limited Lymph Node Dissection in Patients With Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer

    Travis Clark;Dipen J. Parekh;Michael S. Cookson;Sam S. Chang

  • BLADDER CANCER CLINICAL GUIDELINES PANEL SUMMARY REPORT ON THE MANAGEMENT OF NONMUSCLE INVASIVE BLADDER CANCER (STAGES Ta, T1 AND TIS)

    Joseph A. Smith;Richard F. Labasky;Abraham T.K. Cockett;John A. Fracchia

  • Regional Lymph Node Metastasis From Bladder Cancer

    Joseph A. Smith;Willet F. Whitmore

  • Early and late perioperative outcomes following radical cystectomy: 90-day readmissions, morbidity and mortality in a contemporary series

    C.J. Stimson;Sam S. Chang;Daniel A. Barocas;John E. Humphrey

  • Baseline Factors as Predictors of Clinical Progression of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Men Treated With Placebo

    E. David Crawford;Shandra S. Wilson;John D. McConnell;Kevin M. Slawin

  • Results of Radical Prostatectomy in Men With Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: Multi-institutional Pooled Analysis

    Glenn S. Gerber;Ronald A. Thisted;Peter T. Scardino;Hubert G. W. Frohmuller

  • Health related quality of life assessment after radical cystectomy: comparison of ileal conduit with continent orthotopic neobladder.

    Sajal C. Dutta;Sam S. Chang;Christopher S. Coffey;Joseph A. Smith

  • Effect of Preoperative Nutritional Deficiency on Mortality After Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer

    Justin R. Gregg;Michael S. Cookson;Sharon Phillips;Shady Salem

  • INCIDENCE AND LOCATION OF PROSTATE AND UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA IN PROSTATES FROM CYSTOPROSTATECTOMIES: IMPLICATIONS FOR POSSIBLE APICAL SPARING SURGERY

    Monica P. Revelo;Michael S. Cookson;Sam S. Chang;M. Frances Shook

  • Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors

    Joseph A. Smith

  • A factorial trial of six interventions for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

    Joseph A. Smith

  • Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer

    Joseph A. Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael S. Cookson
Michael S. Cookson University of Oklahoma
Sam S. Chang
Sam S. Chang Vanderbilt University Medical Center
David F. Penson
David F. Penson Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Prokar Dasgupta
Prokar Dasgupta King's College London
Declan G. Murphy
Declan G. Murphy King's College London
Nathan Lawrentschuk
Nathan Lawrentschuk University of Melbourne
Steven Joniau
Steven Joniau KU Leuven
Alexandre de la Taille
Alexandre de la Taille Université Paris Cité
Morgan Rouprêt
Morgan Rouprêt Université Paris Cité
Inderbir S. Gill
Inderbir S. Gill University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in medicine but seeking flexible education options, online degrees in nursing and healthcare offer an accessible path to rewarding careers. From entry-level qualifications to advanced practice and leadership roles, online programs can fit diverse schedules and goals.

Many students consider affordability an important factor. If you're researching the cheapest online acute care nurse practitioner programs, you'll find competitive options that make advanced practice nursing more achievable. Likewise, you may be wondering how much does online nursing school cost. Tuition varies greatly by program and institution, so it's important to compare costs and financial aid availability.

For nurses aiming to lead or teach, doctorate in nursing education online programs can be a flexible way to earn top credentials while balancing work and life commitments. If you’re an RN looking to advance, the most affordable accredited online rn to bsn programs are designed to help you gain valuable skills and expand your career opportunities.

Exploring online healthcare degrees can help you map a career path in medicine that suits your budget, schedule, and ambitions.

Best Scientists Citing Joseph A. Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles