World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
89
Citations
27129
World Ranking
12762
National Ranking
6521

Joseph A. Smith publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph A. Smith sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 693 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Joseph A. Smith D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph A. Smith sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joseph A. Smith is affiliated with Vanderbilt University Medical Center in the United States. Their research spans several interdisciplinary fields, primarily focusing on biomedical engineering and computer vision, alongside contributions to animal science and public health.

Their published work covers topics such as global health and surgery, global health workforce issues, advanced neural network applications, catalysis for biomass conversion, biofuel production and bioconversion, supercapacitor materials and fabrication, and meteorological phenomena and simulations.

Frequent coauthors in their research include Zheming Zuo, Jonathan Stonehouse, Bogusław Obara, Danielle D. Sweeney, and Christina B. Ching.

Joseph A. Smith has contributed to multiple publication venues, including:

  • The Journal of Urology
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis
  • Optics Express
  • Current Bladder Dysfunction Reports

Among the recent papers featuring their participation are:

  • "Improving the production of furfural from cellulose catalytic pyrolysis using WO3/γ-Al2O3 composite oxides," 2022, Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis
  • "Turbulence strength C n2 estimation from video using physics-based deep learning," 2022, Optics Express
  • "Benefits of an International Volunteer Experience in Residency Training," 2020, Current Bladder Dysfunction Reports
  • "Modular Clause Composition in Plautus," 2021, Mnemosyne
  • "MP30-01 IMPACT AT 20 YEARS: IVUMED BY THE NUMBERS," 2022, The Journal of Urology

The subfields of study associated with their work highlight a multidisciplinary approach and include:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Emergency Medical Services

Best Publications

  • The long-term effect of doxazosin, finasteride, and combination therapy on the clinical progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

    John D. McConnell;Claus G. Roehrborn;Oliver M. Bautista;Gerald L. Andriole

  • A randomized trial of intravesical doxorubicin and immunotherapy with bacille Calmette-Guérin for transitional-cell carcinoma of the bladder.

    Lamm Dl;Blumenstein Ba;Crawford Ed;Montie Je

  • Robot-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer (RAZOR): an open-label, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial

    Dipen J Parekh;Isildinha M Reis;Erik P Castle;Mark L Gonzalgo

  • Postoperative nomogram predicting risk of recurrence after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.

    Bernard H. Bochner;Guido Dalbagni;Michael W. Kattan;Paul Fearn

  • Analysis of Early Complications After Radical Cystectomy: Results of a Collaborative Care Pathway

    Sam S. Chang;Michael S. Cookson;Roxelyn G. Baumgartner;Nancy Wells

  • Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: what is the learning curve?

    S. Duke Herrell;Joseph A. Smith

  • A Comparison of the Incidence and Location of Positive Surgical Margins in Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy and Open Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy

    Joseph A. Smith;Robert C. Chan;Sam S. Chang;S. Duke Herrell

  • CLINICAL UNDER STAGING OF HIGH RISK NONMUSCLE INVASIVE UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA TREATED WITH RADICAL CYSTECTOMY

    Sajal C. Dutta;Joseph A. Smith;Scott B. Shappell;Christopher S. Coffey

  • Randomized Prospective Evaluation of Extended Versus Limited Lymph Node Dissection in Patients With Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer

    Travis Clark;Dipen J. Parekh;Michael S. Cookson;Sam S. Chang

  • BLADDER CANCER CLINICAL GUIDELINES PANEL SUMMARY REPORT ON THE MANAGEMENT OF NONMUSCLE INVASIVE BLADDER CANCER (STAGES Ta, T1 AND TIS)

    Joseph A. Smith;Richard F. Labasky;Abraham T.K. Cockett;John A. Fracchia

  • Regional Lymph Node Metastasis From Bladder Cancer

    Joseph A. Smith;Willet F. Whitmore

  • Early and late perioperative outcomes following radical cystectomy: 90-day readmissions, morbidity and mortality in a contemporary series

    C.J. Stimson;Sam S. Chang;Daniel A. Barocas;John E. Humphrey

  • Baseline Factors as Predictors of Clinical Progression of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Men Treated With Placebo

    E. David Crawford;Shandra S. Wilson;John D. McConnell;Kevin M. Slawin

  • Results of Radical Prostatectomy in Men With Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: Multi-institutional Pooled Analysis

    Glenn S. Gerber;Ronald A. Thisted;Peter T. Scardino;Hubert G. W. Frohmuller

  • Health related quality of life assessment after radical cystectomy: comparison of ileal conduit with continent orthotopic neobladder.

    Sajal C. Dutta;Sam S. Chang;Christopher S. Coffey;Joseph A. Smith

  • Effect of Preoperative Nutritional Deficiency on Mortality After Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer

    Justin R. Gregg;Michael S. Cookson;Sharon Phillips;Shady Salem

  • INCIDENCE AND LOCATION OF PROSTATE AND UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA IN PROSTATES FROM CYSTOPROSTATECTOMIES: IMPLICATIONS FOR POSSIBLE APICAL SPARING SURGERY

    Monica P. Revelo;Michael S. Cookson;Sam S. Chang;M. Frances Shook

  • Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors

    Joseph A. Smith

  • A factorial trial of six interventions for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

    Joseph A. Smith

  • Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer

    Joseph A. Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael S. Cookson
Michael S. Cookson University of Oklahoma
Sam S. Chang
Sam S. Chang Vanderbilt University Medical Center
David F. Penson
David F. Penson Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Prokar Dasgupta
Prokar Dasgupta King's College London
Declan G. Murphy
Declan G. Murphy King's College London
Nathan Lawrentschuk
Nathan Lawrentschuk University of Melbourne
Steven Joniau
Steven Joniau KU Leuven
Alexandre de la Taille
Alexandre de la Taille Université Paris Cité
Morgan Rouprêt
Morgan Rouprêt Université Paris Cité
Inderbir S. Gill
Inderbir S. Gill University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in medicine but seeking flexible education options, online degrees in nursing and healthcare offer an accessible path to rewarding careers. From entry-level qualifications to advanced practice and leadership roles, online programs can fit diverse schedules and goals.

Many students consider affordability an important factor. If you're researching the cheapest online acute care nurse practitioner programs, you'll find competitive options that make advanced practice nursing more achievable. Likewise, you may be wondering how much does online nursing school cost. Tuition varies greatly by program and institution, so it's important to compare costs and financial aid availability.

For nurses aiming to lead or teach, doctorate in nursing education online programs can be a flexible way to earn top credentials while balancing work and life commitments. If you’re an RN looking to advance, the most affordable accredited online rn to bsn programs are designed to help you gain valuable skills and expand your career opportunities.

Exploring online healthcare degrees can help you map a career path in medicine that suits your budget, schedule, and ambitions.

Best Scientists Citing Joseph A. Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles