World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jeanin E. van Hooft

Jeanin E. van Hooft

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
86
Citations
29580
World Ranking
14049
National Ranking
535

Jeanin E. van Hooft publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeanin E. van Hooft sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 467 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jeanin E. van Hooft D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeanin E. van Hooft sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jeanin E. van Hooft is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands, specializing primarily in the field of Medicine. Their work extensively covers subfields including Surgery, Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology, and Gastroenterology.

Their main research interests are reflected in their focus on medical topics such as:

  • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
  • Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
  • Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
  • Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments
  • Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
  • Esophageal and GI Pathology

Jeanin E. van Hooft has contributed to a substantial number of scientific publications, particularly frequenting these venues:

  • Endoscopy (47 publications)
  • HPB (26 publications)
  • Pancreatology (24 publications)
  • Gastroenterology (21 publications)
  • Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (16 publications)

Recent noteworthy papers include:

  • Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Versus Immediate Surgery for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Results of the Dutch Randomized Phase III PREOPANC Trial, 2020, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial gastrointestinal lesions: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2022, 2022, Endoscopy
  • Endoscopic diagnosis and management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (NVUGIH): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2021, 2021, Endoscopy
  • Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2020, 2020, Endoscopy
  • ESGE and ESGENA Position Statement on gastrointestinal endoscopy and the COVID-19 pandemic, 2020, Endoscopy

They frequently collaborate with a set of co-authors, including:

  • Marc G. Besselink
  • Marco J. Bruno
  • Paul Fockens
  • Robert C. Verdonk
  • Rogier P. Voermans

Best Publications

  • European evidence-based guidelines on pancreatic cystic neoplasms

    Marco Del Chiaro;Marc G. Besselink;Lianne Scholten;Marco J. Bruno

  • Management of epithelial precancerous conditions and lesions in the stomach (MAPS II): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), European Helicobacter and Microbiota Study Group (EHMSG), European Society of Pathology (ESP), and Sociedade Portuguesa de Endoscopia Digestiva (SPED) guideline update 2019.

    Pedro Pimentel-Nunes;Diogo Libânio;Ricardo Marcos-Pinto;Miguel Areia

  • Self-expandable metal stents for obstructing colonic and extracolonic cancer: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline

    Jeanin E. Van Hooft;Emo E. Van Halsema;Geoffroy Vanbiervliet;Regina G.H. Beets-Tan

  • Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Versus Immediate Surgery for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Results of the Dutch Randomized Phase III PREOPANC Trial

    Eva Versteijne;Mustafa Suker;Karin Groothuis;Janine M Akkermans-Vogelaar

  • Endoscopic biliary stenting: indications, choice of stents, and results: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline - Updated October 2017.

    Jean-Marc Dumonceau;Andrea Tringali;Ioannis I.S. Papanikolaou;Daniel Blero

  • ERCP-related adverse events: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline

    Jean-Marc Dumonceau;Christine Kapral;Lars Aabakken;Ioannis S. Papanikolaou

  • Endoscopic management of common bile duct stones: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline

    Gianpiero Manes;Gregorios G.A. Paspatis;Lars Aabakken;Andrea Anderloni

  • Colonic stenting versus emergency surgery for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: a multicentre randomised trial

    Jeanin E van Hooft;Jeanin E van Hooft;Willem A Bemelman;Bas Oldenburg;Andreas W Marinelli

  • Papillary cannulation and sphincterotomy techniques at ERCP: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline

    Pier Alberto Testoni;Alberto Mariani;Lars Aabakken;Marianna Arvanitakis

  • Management of patients with increased risk for familial pancreatic cancer: updated recommendations from the International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening (CAPS) Consortium

    Michael Goggins;Kasper Alexander Overbeek;Randall Brand;Sapna Syngal

  • Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2019.

    Cesare Hassan;James East;Franco Radaelli;Cristiano Spada

  • Surgical gastrojejunostomy or endoscopic stent placement for the palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (SUSTENT study): a multicenter randomized trial.

    Suzanne M. Jeurnink;Ewout W. Steyerberg;Jeanin E. van Hooft;Casper H.J. van Eijck

  • Endoscopic management of acute necrotizing pancreatitis: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) evidence-based multidisciplinary guidelines

    Marianna Arvanitakis;Jean-Marc Dumonceau;Jörg Albert;Abdenor Badaoui

  • A Combination of Molecular Markers and Clinical Features Improve the Classification of Pancreatic Cysts

    Simeon Springer;Yuxuan Wang;Marco Dal Molin;David L. Masica

  • ESGE and ESGENA Position Statement on gastrointestinal endoscopy and the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Ian M. Gralnek;Cesare Hassan;Ulrike Beilenhoff;Giulio Antonelli

  • Early closure of a multicenter randomized clinical trial of endoscopic stenting versus surgery for stage IV left-sided colorectal cancer.

    J. E. van Hooft;P. Fockens;A. W. Marinelli;R. Timmer

  • Endoscopic diagnosis and management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (NVUGIH): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2021.

    Ian M. Gralnek;Ian M. Gralnek;Adrian J. Stanley;A. John Morris;Marine Camus

  • Indications, results, and clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline - Updated January 2017.

    Jean Marc Dumonceau;Pierre H. Deprez;Christian Jenssen;Julio Iglesias-Garcia

  • Technical aspects of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Guideline - March 2017

    Marcin Polkowski;Christian Jenssen;Philip Kaye;Silvia Carrara

  • Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2020

    Cesare Hassan;Giulio Antonelli;Jean-Marc Dumonceau;Jaroslaw Regula

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul Fockens
Paul Fockens University of Amsterdam
Marc G. Besselink
Marc G. Besselink University of Amsterdam
Marco J. Bruno
Marco J. Bruno Erasmus University Rotterdam
Peter D. Siersema
Peter D. Siersema Radboud University
Olivier R. Busch
Olivier R. Busch University of Amsterdam
Pieter J. Tanis
Pieter J. Tanis University of Amsterdam
Marcel G. W. Dijkgraaf
Marcel G. W. Dijkgraaf University of Amsterdam
Jean-Marc Dumonceau
Jean-Marc Dumonceau Geneva College
Cesare Hassan
Cesare Hassan Catholic University of America
Casper H.J. van Eijck
Casper H.J. van Eijck Erasmus University Rotterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in healthcare but not sure if medical school is the right fit? There are several in-demand career paths that you can pursue through flexible, affordable online programs. These options can lead to stable jobs and offer a faster way to start making an impact in the health field.

For those drawn to data and technology, a health information technology online degree can be a strong choice. These programs prepare you for roles managing medical records, data privacy, and health analytics.

If you prefer administrative work, consider exploring how much is medical billing and coding school. Billing and coding specialists are essential in healthcare, ensuring providers get paid and records are accurate.

Nursing remains a versatile and rewarding field. You can find a variety of cheapest online fnp program options for those wishing to become family nurse practitioners, as well as affordable nursing programs online for aspiring registered nurses.

These alternative pathways allow you to balance work, family, and study while setting your sights on a fulfilling healthcare career.

Best Scientists Citing Jeanin E. van Hooft

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles