World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 52 1935 1780 46 44 100 8899

L. Krishnamurthy publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by L. Krishnamurthy between 1978 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. L. Krishnamurthy published across 45 years, from 1978 to 2022, averaging 2.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2007. 1 of the 101 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2007. 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 1 publication
1978 2022

101 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
L. Krishnamurthy: publications per year, 1978 to 2022
Year Publications
1978 1
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 1
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 1
1994 1
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 1
1999 1
2000 0
2001 0
2002 1
2003 0
2004 3
2005 2
2006 5
2007 11
2008 6
2009 3
2010 4
2011 8
2012 10
2013 10
2014 8
2015 9
2016 5
2017 7
2018 0
2019 2
2020 0
2021 0
2022 1
Total 101
Download as CSV

L. Krishnamurthy publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where L. Krishnamurthy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 96–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 100 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226 100
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

L. Krishnamurthy D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where L. Krishnamurthy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110 52
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Agronomy
  • Botany
  • Gene

His primary scientific interests are in Agronomy, Plant breeding, Sowing, Drought tolerance and Shoot. Germplasm, Crop, Greenhouse, Plant traits and Productivity are the subjects of his Agronomy studies. The Germplasm study combines topics in areas such as Cropping system, Phenology and Heritability.

His Plant breeding research includes themes of Cultivar and Crop yield. His Sowing study deals with Root system intersecting with Yield, Field capacity, Drought stress, Vegetative reproduction and Root length. He combines subjects such as Quantitative trait locus and Introgression with his study of Drought tolerance.

His most cited work include:

  • Genetic variability of drought-avoidance root traits in the mini-core germplasm collection of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) (212 citations)
  • Large-scale transcriptome analysis in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), an orphan legume crop of the semi-arid tropics of Asia and Africa (199 citations)
  • Variability of root length density and its contributions to seed yield in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under terminal drought stress (183 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

L. Krishnamurthy focuses on Agronomy, Germplasm, Drought tolerance, Horticulture and Cultivar. His Agronomy study frequently draws parallels with other fields, such as Genetic variability. L. Krishnamurthy has included themes like Heritability, Legume, Genetic diversity and Transpiration in his Germplasm study.

His studies deal with areas such as Quantitative trait locus, Chlorophyll and Point of delivery as well as Drought tolerance. L. Krishnamurthy focuses mostly in the field of Root system, narrowing it down to topics relating to Dry weight and, in certain cases, Shoot. His research in Sowing intersects with topics in Canopy, Crop yield, Field capacity, Alfisol and Vertisol.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Agronomy (78.21%)
  • Germplasm (38.46%)
  • Drought tolerance (35.90%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2013-2019)?

  • Agronomy (78.21%)
  • Germplasm (38.46%)
  • Drought tolerance (35.90%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

L. Krishnamurthy mainly investigates Agronomy, Germplasm, Drought tolerance, Gene and Candidate gene. His Horticulture research extends to Agronomy, which is thematically connected. His Germplasm research integrates issues from Productivity, Canopy and Abiotic stress.

His work carried out in the field of Drought tolerance brings together such families of science as Quantitative trait locus, Legume and Transpiration. His work in Legume tackles topics such as Root system which are related to areas like Introgression, Subsoil, Heritability and Genetic variability. His studies deal with areas such as RNA, Biotechnology and Regulator gene as well as Candidate gene.

Between 2013 and 2019, his most popular works were:

  • Scope for improvement of yield under drought through the root traits in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) (51 citations)
  • Evaluation and validation of housekeeping genes as reference for gene expression studies in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) under drought stress conditions. (44 citations)
  • Two key genomic regions harbour QTLs for salinity tolerance in ICCV 2 × JG 11 derived chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.) recombinant inbred lines (41 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Agronomy
  • Botany
  • Gene

His scientific interests lie mostly in Candidate gene, Gene, Genetics, Cajanus and Gene expression. The Candidate gene study combines topics in areas such as Botany, Quantitative trait locus, Genetic marker, Single-nucleotide polymorphism and Inbred strain. His Gene study often links to related topics such as Germplasm.

His Cajanus research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Regulator gene, Pollen, Housekeeping gene, Genotype and Gene regulatory network. His Housekeeping gene research incorporates elements of Reference genes, Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase, Gene expression profiling, Biotechnology and Gene duplication. As part of his studies on Gene expression, he frequently links adjacent subjects like RNA.

Best Publications

  • Plant growth promoting rhizobia: challenges and opportunities

    Subramaniam Gopalakrishnan;Arumugam Sathya;Rajendran Vijayabharathi;R. K. Varshney

  • Genetic dissection of drought tolerance in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

    Rajeev K. Varshney;Mahendar Thudi;Spurthi N. Nayak;Spurthi N. Nayak;Pooran M. Gaur

  • Variability of root length density and its contributions to seed yield in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under terminal drought stress

    J. Kashiwagi;L. Krishnamurthy;J.H. Crouch;R. Serraj

  • Genetic variability of drought-avoidance root traits in the mini-core germplasm collection of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

    Junichi Kashiwagi;L. Krishnamurthy;Hari D. Upadhyaya;Hari Krishna

  • Salt sensitivity in chickpea

    Timothy J. Flowers;Timothy J. Flowers;Pooran M. Gaur;C. L. Laxmipathi Gowda;L. Krishnamurthy

  • Large-scale transcriptome analysis in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), an orphan legume crop of the semi-arid tropics of Asia and Africa.

    Pavana J. Hiremath;Andrew Farmer;Steven B. Cannon;Steven B. Cannon;Jimmy Woodward

  • Resequencing of 429 chickpea accessions from 45 countries provides insights into genome diversity, domestication and agronomic traits.

    Rajeev K. Varshney;Mahendar Thudi;Manish Roorkiwal;Weiming He

  • The first SSR-based genetic linkage map for cultivated groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.).

    R. K. Varshney;D. J. Bertioli;M. C. Moretzsohn;V. Vadez

  • Variation in root traits of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) grown under terminal drought

    R Serraj;L Krishnamurthy;J Kashiwagi;J Kumar

  • Genetic Dissection of Drought and Heat Tolerance in Chickpea through Genome-Wide and Candidate Gene-Based Association Mapping Approaches

    Mahendar Thudi;Hari D. Upadhyaya;Abhishek Rathore;Pooran Mal Gaur

  • Transcriptome analyses reveal genotype- and developmental stage-specific molecular responses to drought and salinity stresses in chickpea.

    Rohini Garg;Rama Shankar;Bijal Thakkar;Himabindu Kudapa

  • Adaptation of grain legumes to climate change: a review

    Vincent Vadez;Jens D. Berger;Tom Warkentin;Senthold Asseng

  • Large genetic variation for heat tolerance in the reference collection of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) germplasm

    L. Krishnamurthy;P. M. Gaur;P. S. Basu;S. K. Chaturvedi

  • Improving Drought-Avoidance Root Traits in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)-Current Status of Research at ICRISAT

    Pooran M. Gaur;Lakshmanan Krishnamurthy;Junichi Kashiwagi

  • Large variation in salinity tolerance in chickpea is explained by differences in sensitivity at the reproductive stage

    V. Vadez;L. Krishnamurthy;R. Serraj;P.M. Gaur

  • Fast-track introgression of "QTL-hotspot" for root traits and other drought tolerance traits in JG 11, an elite and leading variety of chickpea

    Rajeev K. Varshney;Rajeev K. Varshney;Pooran M. Gaur;Siva K. Chamarthi;L. Krishnamurthy

  • Screening sorghum genotypes for salinity tolerant biomass production

    L. Krishnamurthy;Rachid Serraj;C. Tom Hash;Abdullah J. Dakheel

  • Sources of tolerance to terminal drought in the chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) minicore germplasm

    L. Krishnamurthy;J. Kashiwagi;P.M. Gaur;H.D. Upadhyaya

  • Peanut genotypic variation in transpiration efficiency and decreased transpiration during progressive soil drying

    M. Jyostna Devi;T.R. Sinclair;V. Vadez;L. Krishnamurthy

  • Yield, transpiration efficiency, and water-use variations and their interrelationships in the sorghum reference collection

    V. Vadez;L. Krishnamurthy;C. T. Hash;H. D. Upadhyaya

  • Phenotyping Chickpeas and Pigeonpeas for Adaptation to Drought

    Hari Deo Upadhyaya;J Kashiwagi;Rajeev K Varshney;PM Gaur

  • Scope for improvement of yield under drought through the root traits in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

    J. Kashiwagi;L. Krishnamurthy;R. Purushothaman;H.D. Upadhyaya

  • Registration of a drought-resistant chickpea germplasm

    N. P. Saxena;L. Krishnamurthy;C. Johansen

  • Investigation of factors determining genotypic differences in seed yield of non-irrigated and irrigated chickpeas using a physiological model of yield determination

    L. Krishnamurthy;C. Johansen;S. C. Sethi

  • Genotypic variation in moisture response of chickpea grown under line-source sprinklers in a semi-arid tropical environment

    C. Johansen;L. Krishnamurthy;N.P. Saxena;S.C. Sethi

  • Evaluation and validation of housekeeping genes as reference for gene expression studies in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) under drought stress conditions.

    Pallavi Sinha;Vikas K. Singh;V. Suryanarayana;L. Krishnamurthy

  • Identification of pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] lines tolerant to soil salinity

    L. Krishnamurthy;Rachid Serraj;Rachid Serraj;Kedar Nath Rai;C. Tom Hash

  • Scope for genetic manipulation of mineral acquisition in chickpea

    Md. Yusuf Ali;L. Krishnamurthy;N.P. Saxena;O.P. Rupela

  • Estimation of gene effects of the drought avoidance root characteristics in chickpea (C. arietinum L.)

    J. Kashiwagi;L. Krishnamurthy;P.M. Gaur;S. Chandra

  • Consistent variation across soil types in salinity resistance of a diverse range of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes

    L. Krishnamurthy;Neil Turner;P.M. Gaur;H.D. Upadhyaya

  • Partitioning coefficient—A trait that contributes to drought tolerance in chickpea

    L. Krishnamurthy;J. Kashiwagi;H.D. Upadhyaya;C.L.L. Gowda

Frequent Co-Authors

Rajeev K. Varshney
Rajeev K. Varshney Murdoch University
Hari D. Upadhyaya
Hari D. Upadhyaya International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics
Pooran M. Gaur
Pooran M. Gaur University of Western Australia
Vincent Vadez
Vincent Vadez Institut de Recherche pour le Développement
Rachid Serraj
Rachid Serraj Mohammed VI Polytechnic University
Kadambot H. M. Siddique
Kadambot H. M. Siddique University of Western Australia
Neil C. Turner
Neil C. Turner University of Western Australia
C. L. L. Gowda
C. L. L. Gowda International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics
Timothy D. Colmer
Timothy D. Colmer University of Western Australia
Mahendar Thudi
Mahendar Thudi University of Southern Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing L. Krishnamurthy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles