World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 42 7551 7042 441 430 148 7314
Neuroscience 42 7628 7037 223 211 148 7314

Romina Palermo publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Romina Palermo between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Romina Palermo published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 6.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2010. 13 of the 164 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2010. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 3 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 19 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 8 publications
2001 2025

164 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Romina Palermo: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 3
2003 0
2004 2
2005 2
2006 3
2007 4
2008 4
2009 4
2010 19
2011 12
2012 7
2013 8
2014 7
2015 8
2016 6
2017 17
2018 12
2019 12
2020 6
2021 6
2022 3
2023 5
2024 5
2025 8
Total 164
Download as CSV

Romina Palermo publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Romina Palermo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 148 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 148
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Romina Palermo D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Romina Palermo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 42
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Romina Palermo is affiliated with the University of Western Australia and has contributed extensively to the fields of neuroscience and psychology. Their research primarily focuses on cognitive neuroscience and experimental and cognitive psychology, with additional work in clinical and social psychology as well as epidemiology.

Their main research topics include face recognition and perception, evolutionary psychology and human behavior, autism spectrum disorder research, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders, aesthetic perception and analysis, and neural and behavioral psychology studies.

Palermo has published consistently in several academic journals, with frequent contributions to the Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, and the Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. Additional venues of publication include Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews and Cognitive Development.

Recent publications include:

  • Individual differences in trust evaluations are shaped mostly by environments, not genes (2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
  • Eye Gaze in Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Review of Neural Evidence for the Eye Avoidance Hypothesis (2022, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders)
  • A sensorimotor control framework for understanding emotional communication and regulation (2020, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews)
  • Development of face-based trustworthiness impressions in childhood: A systematic review and metaanalysis (2021, Cognitive Development)
  • Serial dependence of facial identity reflects high-level face coding (2021, Vision Research)

Palermo frequently collaborates with a number of researchers, including Linda Jeffery, Clare Sutherland, Gilles E. Gignac, Jeremy Wilmer, and Dana L. Walker. These collaborations have resulted in multiple co-authored publications.

Best Publications

  • Are you always on my mind? A review of how face perception and attention interact.

    Romina Palermo;Gillian Rhodes

  • Not just fear and sadness: Meta-analytic evidence of pervasive emotion recognition deficits for facial and vocal expressions in psychopathy

    Amy Dawel;Richard O'Kearney;Elinor McKone;Romina Palermo;Romina Palermo

  • Diagnosing prosopagnosia: Effects of ageing, sex, and participant–stimulus ethnic match on the Cambridge Face Memory Test and Cambridge Face Perception Test

    Devin C. Bowles;Elinor McKone;Amy Dawel;Bradley Duchaine

  • Photographs of facial expression: Accuracy, response times, and ratings of intensity

    Romina Palermo;Max Coltheart

  • Impaired holistic coding of facial expression and facial identity in congenital prosopagnosia

    Romina Palermo;Romina Palermo;Megan Louise Willis;Davide Rivolta;Elinor McKone

  • Perceived health contributes to the attractiveness of facial symmetry, averageness, and sexual dimorphism.

    Gillian Rhodes;Sakiko Yoshikawa;Romina Palermo;Leigh W. Simmons

  • Cognitive heterogeneity in genetically based prosopagnosia: A family study

    Laura Schmalzl;Romina Palermo;Max Coltheart

  • Training of familiar face recognition and visual scan paths for faces in a child with congenital prosopagnosia

    Laura Schmalzl;Romina Palermo;Melissa Green;Ruth Brunsdon

  • Face ethnicity and measurement reliability affect face recognition performance in developmental prosopagnosia: evidence from the Cambridge Face Memory Test-Australian.

    Elinor McKone;Ashleigh Hall;Madeleine Pidcock;Romina Palermo

  • Individual Differences in the Ability to Recognise Facial Identity Are Associated with Social Anxiety

    Joshua M. Davis;Elinor McKone;Elinor McKone;Hugh Dennett;Kirsty B. O'Connor

  • Attractiveness of own-race, other-race, and mixed-race faces

    Gillian Rhodes;Kieran Lee;Romina Palermo;Mahi Weiss

  • The influence of divided attention on holistic face perception.

    Romina Palermo;Gillian Rhodes

  • The Role of Spatial Attention in Nonconscious Processing A Comparison of Face and Nonface Stimuli

    Matthew Finkbeiner;Romina Palermo

  • Judging Approachability on the Face of It: The Influence of Face and Body Expressions on the Perception of Approachability

    Megan Louise Willis;Romina Palermo;Darren Burke

  • Do people have insight into their face recognition abilities

    Romina Palermo;Bruno Rossion;Gillian Rhodes;Renaud Laguesse

  • New tests to measure individual differences in matching and labelling facial expressions of emotion, and their association with ability to recognise vocal emotions and facial identity

    Romina Palermo;Romina Palermo;Kirsty B. O’Connor;Joshua M. Davis;Jessica Irons

  • Attention to Social Stimuli and Facial Identity Recognition Skills in Autism Spectrum Disorder.

    C.E. Wilson;J. Brock;Romina Palermo

  • Guidelines for studying developmental prosopagnosia in adults and children

    Kirsten A. Dalrymple;Romina Palermo

  • Face recognition impairments despite normal holistic processing and face space coding: Evidence from a case of developmental prosopagnosia

    Tirta Susilo;Elinor McKone;Hugh Dennett;Hayley Darke

  • Orbitofrontal cortex lesions result in abnormal social judgements to emotional faces

    Megan Louise Willis;Romina Palermo;Darren Burke;Ky McGrillen

  • Individual differences in trust evaluations are shaped mostly by environments, not genes

    Clare A. M. Sutherland;Clare A. M. Sutherland;Nichola S. Burton;Jeremy B. Wilmer;Gabriëlla A. M. Blokland

Frequent Co-Authors

Gillian Rhodes
Gillian Rhodes University of Western Australia
Linda Jeffery
Linda Jeffery Curtin University
Elinor McKone
Elinor McKone Australian National University
Max Coltheart
Max Coltheart Macquarie University
Laurie A. Miller
Laurie A. Miller Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
Richard O'Kearney
Richard O'Kearney Australian National University
Mark A. Williams
Mark A. Williams Macquarie University
Genevieve McArthur
Genevieve McArthur Macquarie University
Olivier Piguet
Olivier Piguet University of Sydney
A. Mike Burton
A. Mike Burton University of York

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience isn’t limited to traditional university routes—there are a growing number of related online degrees that offer flexibility and diverse career opportunities. For those interested in psychology careers, consider online psyd programs accredited by apa. These programs are ideal for students aiming for licensure and advanced clinical roles in mental health.

If your interests extend to counseling and family dynamics, online marriage and family therapy programs are a great option to quickly enter the field. Many of these programs offer accelerated tracks for faster completion.

Speaking of pace, those eager to start working sooner can look into accelerated degree programs. These allow students to complete their studies in a condensed timeframe, helping to jumpstart your career.

When considering your options, also review degrees that pay well in related fields. High-paying careers are available in neuroscience, psychology, and connected disciplines. Researching the best pathway based on your interests and goals can lead to both rewarding and lucrative outcomes.

Best Scientists Citing Romina Palermo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles