World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
36
Citations
4111
World Ranking
9634
National Ranking
955

Markus Bindemann publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Markus Bindemann sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 147 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Markus Bindemann D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Markus Bindemann sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Markus Bindemann is affiliated with the University of Kent in the United Kingdom. Their research focuses on multiple areas within cognitive science, especially emphasizing the study of face recognition and perception.

The primary fields of study in their work include:

  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology
  • Computer Science

Within these fields, the scientist has contributed specifically to subfields such as:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Social Psychology

Their research topics encompass a broad range of psychological and neuroscientific inquiries, including:

  • Face Recognition and Perception
  • Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Face recognition and analysis
  • Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Deception detection and forensic psychology
  • Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

Markus Bindemann has published numerous papers across several well-regarded academic journals. Notable recent publications include:

  • "Avatars with faces of real people: A construction method for scientific experiments in virtual reality," 2021, Behavior Research Methods
  • "Ingroup and outgroup differences in face detection," 2022, British Journal of Psychology
  • "Measurement of Sexual Interests with Pupillary Responses: A Meta-Analysis," 2021, Archives of Sexual Behavior
  • "Visual perspective-taking in complex natural scenes," 2021, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
  • "Face identification in the laboratory and in virtual worlds," 2021, Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition

The scientist commonly publishes in venues such as:

  • Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
  • Cognition
  • Applied Cognitive Psychology
  • Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
  • Visual Cognition

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Matthew C. Fysh
  • Jonathan E. Prunty
  • J. A. Allen
  • Cade McCall
  • A. Mike Burton

Best Publications

  • Faces retain attention

    Markus Bindemann;A. Mike Burton;Ignace T. C. Hooge;Rob Jenkins

  • Viewpoint and center of gravity affect eye movements to human faces.

    Markus Bindemann;Christoph Scheepers;A. Mike Burton

  • Scene and screen center bias early eye movements in scene viewing.

    Markus Bindemann

  • How do eye gaze and facial expression interact

    Markus Bindemann;A. Mike Burton;Stephen R. H. Langton

  • Species identification by experts and non-experts: comparing images from field guides

    Gail E. Austen;Markus Bindemann;Richard A. Griffiths;David L. Roberts

  • The control of attention to faces

    Markus Bindemann;A. Mike Burton;Stephen R. H. Langton;Stefan R. Schweinberger

  • The Kent Face Matching Test

    Matthew C. Fysh;Markus Bindemann

  • Brain potential correlates of face recognition: Geometric distortions and the N250r brain response to stimulus repetitions

    Markus Bindemann;A. Mike Burton;Hartmut Leuthold;Stefan R. Schweinberger

  • Me, myself, and I: different recognition rates for three photo-IDs of the same person.

    Markus Bindemann;Adam Sandford

  • Capacity limits for face processing.

    Markus Bindemann;A. Mike Burton;Rob Jenkins

  • Sex differences in unfamiliar face identification: evidence from matching tasks.

    Ahmed M. Megreya;Markus Bindemann;Markus Bindemann;Catriona Havard

  • Who can recognize unfamiliar faces? Individual differences and observer consistency in person identification.

    Markus Bindemann;Meri Avetisyan;Tim Rakow

  • Viewers base estimates of face matching accuracy on their own familiarity: Explaining the photo-ID paradox

    Kay L. Ritchie;Kay L. Ritchie;Finlay G. Smith;Rob Jenkins;Markus Bindemann

  • Face, body, and center of gravity mediate person detection in natural scenes

    Markus Bindemann;Christoph Scheepers;Heather J. Ferguson;A. Mike Burton

  • Revisiting the Processing of Internal and External Features of Unfamiliar Faces: The Headscarf Effect

    Ahmed M Megreya;Markus Bindemann

  • The Effect of Feedback on Face‐Matching Accuracy

    Hamood M. Alenezi;Hamood M. Alenezi;Markus Bindemann

  • Individual differences in personality and face identification

    Ahmed M. Megreya;Markus Bindemann

  • Finding needles in haystacks: identity mismatch frequency and facial identity verification.

    Markus Bindemann;Meri Avetisyan;Kristy-Ann Blackwell

  • Individual differences in face identification postdict eyewitness accuracy

    Markus Bindemann;Chennelle Brown;Tiffany Koyas;Andrew Russ

  • The Role of Color in Human Face Detection

    Markus Bindemann;A. Mike Burton

  • Gaze perception requires focused attention: evidence from an interference task.

    A. Mike Burton;Markus Bindemann;Stephen R. H. Langton;Stefan R. Schweinberger

  • Face processing: Systems, Disorders and Cultural Differences

    Markus Bindemann

Frequent Co-Authors

A. Mike Burton
A. Mike Burton University of York
David L. Roberts
David L. Roberts University of Kent
Stefan R. Schweinberger
Stefan R. Schweinberger Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Richard A. Griffiths
Richard A. Griffiths University of Kent
Rob Jenkins
Rob Jenkins University of York
Vicki Bruce
Vicki Bruce Newcastle University
Stephany M. Biello
Stephany M. Biello University of Glasgow
Christoph Scheepers
Christoph Scheepers University of Glasgow
Ian A. Apperly
Ian A. Apperly University of Birmingham
Ignace T. C. Hooge
Ignace T. C. Hooge Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree in the USA opens up a range of online programs and career paths—especially in fast-growing fields like substance abuse counseling. Many roles require at least a bachelor’s degree, while some counseling careers call for specialized master’s degrees or certifications.

The requirements can differ widely by location. For example, if you want to learn how to become a substance abuse counselor in Spokane, you’ll find specific steps and local licensing laws to follow. Similarly, St. Louis substance abuse counselors education requirements outline state-specific coursework, practical experience, and certification standards.

Interested in Florida? Review the St. Petersburg substance abuse counselors education requirements to understand the local expectations for education and training. If you’re considering California as your base, check out the Stockton substance abuse counselor certification requirements for detailed information on the qualifications needed.

Online programs offer a flexible route for meeting many of these requirements, making them a practical choice for working adults or career switchers. Be sure to research the unique standards for your intended location before enrolling.

Best Scientists Citing Markus Bindemann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles